Assessing the learning potential and students' perception of rich lecture captures

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 187-195

  Pale, P ^a   Petrovic J ^a   Jeren, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

LeCTo player; Rich lecture capture; Student performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897759220     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12039     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akiyama, H., Teramoto, A., & Kozono, K. (2008). Educational effect of online lecture using streaming technology. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 91(3), 37-44. doi:10.1002/ecj.10072
2. Barokas, J., Ketterl, M., & Brooks, C. (2010). Lecture capture: Student perceptions, expectations, and behaviors. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 424-431). Orlando, Florida, USA. Retrieved from: http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/papers_pdf/2010_02.pdf
3. Bassili, J. N. (2006). Promotion and prevention orientations in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 444-455. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00192.x
4. Bollmeier, S. G., Wenger, P. J., & Forinash, A. B. (2010). Impact of online lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(7), Article 127. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972522/
5. Budgett, S. C., Cumming, J. M., & Miller, C. A. (2007). The role of screencasting in statistics courses. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute 2007. Lisboa, Portugal. Retrieved from http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/16851
6. Chiu, D.-Y., Pan, Y.-C., & Chang, W.-C. (2008). Using rough set theory to construct e-learning FAQ retrieval infrastructure. In L. Li (Ed.), Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (pp. 547-552). Lanzhou, China. doi:10.1109/UMEDIA.2008.4570951
7. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205-249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
8. Day, J., & Foley, J. (2006). Evaluating web lectures: A case study from HCI. In R. E. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006 (pp. 195-200). Montréal, Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/1125451.1125493
9. Day, J., Foley, J., Groeneweg, R., & Van der Mast, C. (2005). Enhancing the classroom learning experience with web lectures. In C.-K. Looi, D. Jonassen & M. Ikeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences: Sharing Good Practices of Research, Experimentation and Innovation (pp. 642-645). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Retrieved from: http://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/65/04-18.pdf
10. DeAngelis, K. (2009). Lecture capture: Student opinion and implementation strategies. UNC Charlotte Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://teaching.uncc.edu/sites/teaching.uncc.edu/files/LectureCaptureTipSheet.pdf
11. Demetriadis, S., & Pombortsis, A. (2007). e-Lectures for flexible learning: A study on their learning efficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 147-157. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/10_2/13.pdf
12. Dev, P., Rindfleisch, T. C., Kush, S. J., & Stringer, J. R. (2000). An analysis of technology usage for streaming digital video in support of a preclinical curriculum. In J. M. Overhage (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium (pp. 180-184). Los Angeles, CA: Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/11079869/?tool=pubmed
13. Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of 'seductive details' on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
14. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Grabe, M., & Christopherson, K. (2008). Optional student use of online lecture resources: Resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 1-10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00228.x
16. Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Wassertheurer, S., & Hessinger, M. (2009). Learning performance with interactive simulations in medical education: Lessons learned from results of learning complex physiological models with the HAEMOdynamics SIMulator. Computers & Education, 52, 292-301. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.008
17. Jadin, T., Gruber, A., & Batinic, B. (2009). Learning with e-lectures: The meaning of learning strategies. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 282-288. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_3/23.pdf
18. Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55, 209-217. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.006
19. Legum, H., Brittan-Powell, C., Schmitt, B., Wakefield, M., Owens-Southall, M., O'Bryant, B., Jeter-Twilley, R., & Spry, J. (2010). Perceptions of a lecture capture system and academic achievement among online graduate students. The American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences Journal, 14, 76-88.
20. Liu, Y., Yin, C., & Ogata, H. (2009). Supporting Q & A in a web-based Japanese language learning environment. In R. G. Qiu & H. Zhao (Eds.), Proceedings of the WASE International Conference on Information Engineering (pp. 422-425). Taiyuan, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICIE.2009.29
21. Lovell, K., & Plantegenest, M. A. (2011). Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures. Journal of the international association of medical science educators, 19, 20-25.
22. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 209-220. doi:10.1080/0969594032000121289
24. McElroy, J., & Blount, Y. (2006). You, me and ilecture. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reiman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 549-558). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p87.pdf
25. Pale, P., Miletic, I., Kostanjcar, Z., Pandzic, H., & Jeren, B. (2007). Pyramidia - an integrative e-learning tool. In M. P. Kaźmierkowski & J. Modelski (Eds.), EUROCON, 2007. The International Conference on Computer as a Tool (pp. 2459-2464). doi:10.1109/EURCON.2007.4400419
26. Pale, P., Miletic, I., Kostanjcar, Z., Pandzic, H., & Jeren, B. (2011). Development of Pyramidia: An integrative e-learning multimedia tool. Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 48, 264-279.
27. Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5-10. doi:16/j.chb.2010.05.006
28. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. (2006). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18-23. doi:10.1119/1.2150754
29. Preston, G., Phillips, R., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Woo, K., & Green, D. (2010). Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 717-728. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/download/10768/12392
30. Roskos, K., & Neuman, S. B. (2012). Formative assessment: Simply, no additives. Reading Teacher, 65, 534-538. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01079
31. Schütz, F. (2003). Producing eLearning materials on the fly - only a great dream? In A. Méndez-Vilas & J. Mesa-González (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multimedia and ICTs in Education (pp. 147-151). Badajoz, Spain. Retrieved from: http://www11.in.tum.de/dokument.php?id_dokument=149
32. Settle, A., Dettori, L., & Davidson, M. J. (2011). Does lecture capture make a difference for students in traditional classrooms. In G. Rößling, T. L. Naps, & C. Spannagel, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 78-82). Darmstadt, Germany. doi:10.1145/1999747.1999772
33. Smith, C., Whiteley, H., Stone, M., & Currie, R. (1999). Multimedia lectures and examination performance in cognitive psychology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 173-176. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.152089.x
34. Soong, S., Chan, L., Cheers, C., & Hu, C. (2006). Impact of video recorded lectures among students. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reiman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 789-793). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p179.pdf
35. Spickard, A., Alrajeh, N., Cordray, D., & Gigante, J. (2002). Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: Does it matter? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 540-545. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1495076/
36. Stephenson, J. E., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. K. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computers & Education, 50, 640-651. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.007
37. Stolzenberg, D., & Pforte, S. (2007). Lecture recording: Structural and symbolic information vs. flexibility of presentation. e-Journal of e-Learning, 5, 219-226. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=38
38. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 3, 257-287. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.257
39. Toppin, I. (2011). Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student versus faculty perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 383-393. doi:10.1007/s10639-010-9140-x
40. Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 19-37. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9128-7
41. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229-243. doi:10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM
42. Wofford, M. M., Spickard, A. W., & Wofford, J. L. (2001). The computer-based lecture. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 464-467. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007464.x
43. Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 331-358.