Does lecture capture make a difference for students in traditional classrooms

ITiCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 78-82

  Settle, Amber ^a   Dettori, Lucia ^a   Davidson, Mary Jo ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

lecture capture systems; retention; student perception; student performance

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE OF COMPUTING; IN-HOUSE SYSTEMS; LECTURE CAPTURE; RETENTION; STUDENT PERCEPTION; STUDENT PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DIGITAL STORAGE; E-LEARNING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INNOVATION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79960312295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1999747.1999772     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Balfour, J. 2006. Audio Recordings of Lectures as an E-Learning Resource. In the Built Environment Education Annual Conference (BEECON 2006), September 2006, London, U.K., http://www.cebe.heacademy.ac.uk/news/events/beecon2006/pdf/ P24-Jim-Balfour.pdf, accessed August 2010.
2. Briggs, L. 2007. Can Classroom Capture Boost Retention Rates? Campus Technology. http://campustechnology.com/articles/2007/10/can-classroom-capture- boost-retention-rates.aspx, accessed August 2010.
3. Brotherton, J. and Abowd, G. 2004. Lessons Learned From eClass: Assessing Automated Capture and Access in the Classroom. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11:2, pp. 121-155.
4. Davis, S., Connolly, A, and Linfield, E. 2009. Lecture Capture: Making the Most of Face-to-face Learning. In Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 4:2.
5. Deal, A. 2007. A Teaching with Technology White Paper: Podcasting. Available from http://192.231.233.6/IDlab/CMU-Podcasting-Jun07.pdf, accessed August 2010.
6. Guertin, L., Bodek, M., Zappe, S., and Heeyoung, K. 2007. Questioning the Student Use of and Desire for Lecture Podcasts. In the Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3:2.
7. Knight, L. , Steinbach, T., and White J. 2002. An Alternative Approach to Web-based Education: Technology-intensive, Not Labor-Intensive. In the Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
8. McGarr, O. 2009. A Review of Podcasting in Higher Education: Its Influence on the Traditional Lecture. In the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25:3, pp. 309-321.
9. th Teaching Matters Conference: Showcasing Innovation, University of Tasmania.
10. Nagel, D. 2008. Lecture Capture: No Longer Optional? http:// campustechnology.com/articles/2008/09/lecture-capture-no-longer-optional.aspx, accessed August 2010.
11. Toppin, I. 2010. Video Lecture Capture (VLC) system: A Comparison of Student versus Faculty Perceptions. In Education and Information Technologies, Volume 15.
12. Von Konsky, B., Ivins, J., and Gribble, S. 2009. Lecture Attendance and Web Based Lecture Technologies: A Comparison of Student Perceptions and Usage Patterns. In the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24:4, pp. 581-595.