e-Lectures for flexible learning: A study on their learning efficiency

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 147-157

  Demetriadis, Stavros ^a   Pombortsis, Andreas ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Digitized lectures; e Lectures; Flexible learning; Media in education

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250866093     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R., Airasian P. W., Cruikshank K. A., Mayer P. R., Pintrich P. R., Raths J., & Wittrock M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Longman.
2. Bell, T., Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., & Vargo, J. (2001). Digital Lectures: If you make them, will students use them? Constraints on effective delivery of flexible learning systems. Interactive multimedia electronic journal of computer-enhanced learning, retrieved May 10, 2007, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/ 2001/2/ 06/index.asp.
3. Campbell, G. M., Garforth, A. A., & Bishop, A. (2004). Engaging first-year chemical engineering students with video-based course material. Proceedings of the networked learning conference, retrieved May 15, 2007, from http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2004/Proceedings/Contents.htm.
4. Clark, R. & Craig, T. (1992). Research and theory on multi-media learning effects. In M. Giardina (Ed.), Interactive multimedia learning environments: Human factors and technical considerations on design issues, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 19-30.
5. Collis, B & Moonen J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world, Oxon: Routledge Falmer.
6. Dev, P., Rindfleisch, T. C., Kush, S. J., & Stringer, J. R. (2000). An analysis of technology usage for streaming digital video in support of a preclinical curriculum. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 180-184.
7. Ellis, L., & Mathis, D. (1985). College students learning from televised versus conventional classroom lectures: a controlled experiment. Higher Education, 14, 165-173.
8. Fritze, Y., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2003). Comparing lectures: Effects of the technological context of the studio. Education and Information Technologies, 8 (4), 327-343.
9. Jones, V., Jo, J. H., & Cranitch, G. (2003). A blended e-learning solution for the delivery of tertiary education. In Antonio Palma dos Reis and Pedro Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of IADIS International Conference e-Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 42-47.
10. Joukov, N., Fauster,. M., & Chiueh, T. (2003). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a digital lectern system. Proceedings of International Conference on Web-based Learning (ICWL '03), 241-252.
11. Rui, Y., Gupta, A., Grudin, J., & He L. (2004). Automating lecture capture and broadcast: technology and videography. Multimedia Systems, 10, 3-15.
12. Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International review of research in open and distance learning, 1(1), retrieved May 10, 2007, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/4/24.
13. Schramm, W. (1962). What we know about learning from instructional television. In W. Schramm (Ed.), Educational television: The next ten years. Stanford CA: The Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University, 66-67.
14. Spickard, A. III, Alrajeh, N., Cordray, D., & Gigante, J. (2002). Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? Journal of general internal medicine, 17, 540-545.
15. Whitelock, D. & Jelfs, A. (2003). Editorial: Journal of educational media special issue on blended learning, Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2-3), 99-100.
16. Wofford, M. M., Spickard, A. W. III, & Wofford, J. L. (2001). The computer-based lecture. Journal of general internal medicine, 16, 464-467.