Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 201-212

  Metzger, Anthony J ^a,b   Dromerick, Alexander W ^c,d   Schabowsky, Christopher N ^a,b   Holley, Rahsaan J ^a   Monroe, Brian ^e   Lum, Peter S ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Catholic University of America   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^d GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e District Amputee Care   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputation; Feedforward; Motor control; Prosthesis; Reaching; Training; Trajectory; Transradial; Upper limb; Velocity

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CONTROL SUBJECT; CORTICAL REORGANIZATION; END POINTS; FEEDFORWARD; MOTOR COMMANDS; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT DURATION; PEAK VELOCITIES; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHETIC DEVICES; REACHING MOVEMENTS; REJECTION RATES; TRAJECTORY ERRORS; UPPER LIMBS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

FEEDFORWARD CONTROL; TRAJECTORIES; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS;

ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; ADAPTATION; AGED; AMPUTATION; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SURGERY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AMPUTATION; AMPUTEES; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; UPPER EXTREMITY; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 77954369738     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2009.06.0075     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Reha-bil. 2008;89(3):422-29. [PMID: 18295618], DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005
2. Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg Am. 1995; 20(4):619-22. [PMID: 7594289], DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80278-3
3. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):60-63. [PMID: 14660200], DOI:10.1080/09638280410001645094
4. Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Markotic A, Lum P. Effect of training on upper-extremity prosthetic performance and motor learning: A single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1199-1204. [PMID: 18503820], DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.058
5. Graziano MS. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(18):10418-21. [PMID: 10468623], DOI:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418
6. Van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol. 2002;12(10):834-37. [PMID: 12015120], DOI:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00836-9
7. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(4):490-97. [PMID: 15793578]
8. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Handedness: Dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88(5):2408-21. [PMID: 12424282], DOI:10.1152/jn.00901.2001
9. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24. [PMID: 8182467]
10. Schabowsky CN, Dromerick AW, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Lum PS. Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res. 2008;188(4):589-601. [PMID: 18443766], DOI:10.1007/s00221-008-1394-9
11. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 1990.
12. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;5(1):24-38.
13. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-92. [PMID: 7333761], DOI:10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
14. Scheidt RA, Rymer WZ. Control strategies for the transition from multijoint to single-joint arm movements studied using a simple mechanical constraint. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83(1): 1-12. [PMID: 10634848]
15. Lackner JR, Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol. 1994; 72(1):299-313. [PMID: 7965013]
16. Simpson DC. The choice of control system for the multi-movement prosthesis: Extended physiological proprioception (EPP). In: Herberts P, Kadefors R, Magnusson R, Petersen I, editors. The control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses. Springfield (IL): Charles Thomas; 1974. p. 146-50.
17. Doeringer JA, Hogan N. Performance of above elbow body-powered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42(6):621-31. [PMID: 7790019], DOI:10.1109/10.387202
18. Weeks DL, Wallace SA, Notebloom JT. Precision-grip force changes in the anatomical and prosthetic limb during predictable load increases. Exp Brain Res. 2000;132(3): 404-10. [PMID: 10883390], DOI:10.1007/s002210000337
19. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(1):168-76. [PMID: 12522169], DOI:10.1152/jn.00622.2002
20. Marzi CA, Bisiacchi P, Nicoletti R. Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(12): 1163-77. [PMID: 1838793], DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(91)90031-3
21. Morton SM, Lang CE, Bastian AJ. Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching. Exp Brain Res. 2001;141(4):438-45. [PMID: 11810138], DOI:10.1007/s002210100889
22. Thut G, Cook ND, Regard M, Leenders KL, Halsband U, Landis T. Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1996;108(2):321-27. [PMID: 8815040], DOI:10.1007/BF00228105
23. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):349- 60. [PMID: 15028745], DOI:10.1152/jn.00960.2003
24. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain. 2007;130(8):2146-58. [PMID: 17626039], DOI:10.1093/brain/awm145
25. Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Findley TW, Hallett M. Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man. A study with focal magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1991;114(Pt 1B): 615-27. [PMID: 2004259], DOI:10.1093/brain/114.1.615
26. Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Leigh PN, Sooriakumaran S, Frackowiak RS, Brooks DJ. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72(5):2517-24. [PMID: 7884476]
27. Röricht S, Meyer BU, Niehaus L, Brandt SA. Long-term reorganization of motor cortex outputs after arm amputation. Neurology. 1999;53(1):106-11. [PMID: 10408544]
28. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2518-27. [PMID: 9412643]
29. Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferreri F, Melgari JM, Tecchio F, Tombini M, Pasqualetti P, Vernieri F Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(2):241-54. [PMID: 17589415]
30. Yelnik A, Bonan I, Debray M, Lo E, Gelbert F, Bussel B. Changes in the execution of a complex manual task after ipsilateral ischemic cerebral hemispheric stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(8):806-10. [PMID: 8702376], DOI:10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90261-0
31. Sunderland A, Bowers MP, Sluman SM, Wilcock DJ, Ardron ME. Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive deficit. Stroke. 1999;30(5):949-55. [PMID: 10229726]
32. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(6):3276-85. [PMID: 15295013], DOI:10.1152/jn.00549.2004
33. Wetter S, Poole JL, Haaland KY. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):776-81. [PMID: 15827931], DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.009
34. Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, Marsden CD. Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1992;453:525-46. [PMID: 1464843]
35. Sainburg RL. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res. 2002;142(2):241-58. [PMID: 11807578], DOI:10.1007/s00221-001-0913-8
36. Sainburg RL. Handedness: Differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33(4):206-13. [PMID: 16239839], DOI:10.1097/00003677-200510000-00010