Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: A population-based survey

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 294-303

  Østlie, Kristin ^a   Lesjø, Ingrid Marie ^a   Franklin, Rosemary Joy ^a   Garfelt, Beate ^a   Skjeldal, Ola Hunsbeth ^b   Magnus, Per ^c  

^a INNLANDET HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^b VESTRE VIKEN HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Amputees; Multivariate analysis; Prosthesis use; Rehabilitation; Rejection; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AMPUTEES; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84861406897     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.635405     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Saradjian A, Thompson AR, Datta D. The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: Positive coping and minimizing feeling different. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:871-883.
2. Roeschlein RA, Domholdt E. Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int 1989;13:14-18.
3. Freeland AE, Psonak R. Traumatic below-elbow amputations. Orthopedics 2007;30:120-126.
4. Kejlaa GH. The social and economic outcome after upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992;16:25-31.
5. Durance JP, O'Shea BJ. Upper limb amputees: A clinic profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:68-72.
6. Østlie K, Skjeldal OH, Garfelt B, Magnus P. Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: Prevalence, demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1636-1649.
7. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:236-257.
8. Jones LE, Davidson JH. The long-term outcome of upper limb amputees treated at a rehabilitation centre in Sydney, Australia. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:437-442.
9. Biddiss E, Chau T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:71-84.
10. Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, Kotnik S, Giordano A. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:393-399.
11. Wright V. Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, 1970 to 2009. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:P3-P63.
12. Shaperman J, Landsberger SE, Setoguchi Y. Early upper limb prosthesis fitting: When and what do we fit? J Prosthet Orthot 2003 Jan;15:11-7.
13. Lake C, Dodson R. Progressive upper limb prosthetics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2006;17:49-72.
14. Berger N. Studies of the upper-extremity amputee. II. The population (1953-55). Artif Limbs 1958;5:57-72.
15. Jones LE, Davidson J. A review of the management of upper-limb amputees. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1997;8:297-322.
16. Datta D, Ibbotson V. Prosthetic rehabilitation of upper limb amputees: A five year review. Clin Rehabil 1991 Nov;5:311-6.
17. Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: Critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:977-987.
18. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:181-192.
19. Schaffalitzky E, NiMhurchadha S, Gallagher P, Hofkamp S, MacLachlan M, Wegener ST. Identifying the values and preferences of prosthetic users: A case study series using the repertory grid technique. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009;33:157-166.
20. Dakpa R, Heger H. Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees. Curr Orthop 1997 Jul;11:193-202.
21. Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:346-357.
22. Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:157-163.
23. McFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A. Unilateral upper-limb loss: Satisfaction and prostheticdevice use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:299-316.
24. Hacking HG, van den Berg JP, Dahmen KT, Post MW. Long-term outcome of upper limb prosthetic use in the Netherlands. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1997 Dec;7:179-181.
25. Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency-acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:172-177.
26. Burger H, Marincek C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18:25-33.
27. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:723-729.
28. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:60-63.
29. Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther 2002;15:62-70.
30. Millstein SG, Heger H, Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: A comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986;10:27-34.
31. Silcox DH 3rd, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, Fleming LL. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1781-1789.
32. Herberts P, Körner L, Caine K, Wensby L. Rehabilitation of unilateral below-elbow amputees with myoelectric prostheses. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980;12:123-128.
33. Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg Br 1997;22:73-76.
34. StÜrup J, Thyregod HC, Jensen JS, Retpen JB, Boberg G, Rasmussen E, Jensen S. Traumatic amputation of the upper limb: the use of bodypowered prostheses and employment consequences. Prosthet Orthot Int 1988;12:50-52.
35. Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, Ehde D, Smith DG. Prosthesis use in persons with lower-and upperlimb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:961-972.
36. Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Döderlein L. Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:362-370.
37. van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983;7:141-151.
38. Stein RB, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:243-248.
39. Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK, Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:363-366.
40. Malone JM, Fleming LL, Roberson J, Whitesides TE Jr, Leal JM, Poole JU, Grodin RS. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 1984;21:33-41.
41. Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:831-836.
42. Lake C. Effects of prosthetic training on upper-extremity prosthesis use. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9:3-9.
43. Carter I, Torrance WN, Merry PH. Functional results following amputation of the upper limb. Ann Phys Med 1969;10:137-141.