Dynamical modeling and controllability analysis of a flexible needle in soft tissue

International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Boroomand, Arefeh ^a   Tavakoli, Mahdi ^a   Sloboda, Ron ^b   Usmani, Nawaid ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CROSS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Controllability; Dynamic modeling; Flexible needle

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROLLABILITY; DYNAMIC MODELS; TISSUE;

CLINICAL PRACTICES; CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL; CONTROLLABILITY ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC MODELING APPROACH; DYNAMICS-BASED CONTROL; FLEXIBLE NEEDLE; FORCES AND TORQUES; POSITIONING ERROR;

NEEDLES;

EID: 84897115362     PISSN: 17939623     EISSN: 17939615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1793962313500311     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Taschereau R., Pouliot J., Roy J., Tremblay D., Seed misplacement and stabilizing needles in transperineal permanent prostate implants, Radiother. Oncol. 55(1): 59-63, 2000.
2. Nath S., Chen Z., Yue N., Trumpore S., Peschel R., Dosimetric effects of needle divergence in prostate seed implant using I and Pd radioactive seeds, Med. Phys. 27:1058, 2000.
3. Al-Qaisieh B., Pre- and post-implant dosimetry: An intercomparison between UK prostate brachytherapy centres, Radiother. Oncol. 66: 181-183, 2003.
4. Dawson J. E., Wu T., Roy T., Gu J. Y., Kim H., Dose effects of seed placement deviations from pre-planned positions in ultrasound guided prostate implants, Radiother. Oncol. 32: 268-270, 1994.
5. Alterovitz R., Goldhere K., Pouliot J., Taschereau R., Hsu I. C., Needle insertion and radioactive seed implantation in Human tissues: Simulation and sensitivity analysis, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics & Automation (ICRA), Vol. 2, pp. 1793-1799, 2003.
6. DiMaio S. P., Salcudean S. E., Needle insertion modeling and simulation, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., Special Issue Med Robotics, 19: 864-875, 2003.
7. Dehghan E., Salcudean S. E., Needle insertion parameter optimization for brachytherapy, IEEE Trans. Robot. 25: 509-525, 2009.
8. Doblare M. et al., On modeling soft biological tissue with natural element method, Int. J. Model., Simulat., Sci. Comput. 87: 87-116, 2007.
9. Webster R. J. I., Kim J. S., Cowan N. J., Chirikjian G. S., Okamura A. M., Nonholonomic modelling of needle steering, Int. J. Robot. Res. 25: 509-525, 2006.
10. Alterovitz R., Branicky M., Goldberg K., Motion planning under uncertainty for image-guided needle steering, Int. J. Robot. Res. 27(11-12): 1361-1374, 2008.
11. Alterovitz R., Goldberg K., Okamura A., Planning for steerable bevel-tip needle insertion through 2D soft tissues with obstacles, IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1652-1657, 2005.
12. Park W., Kim J. S., Zhou Y., Cowan N. J., Okamura A.M., Chirikjian G. S., Diffusionbased motion planning for a nonholonomic flexible needle model, IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 4600-4605, 2005.
13. DiMaio S. P., Modeling simulation and planning of needle motion in soft tissues, Ph.D. thesis, University of British Colombia, 2003.
14. Glozman D., Shoham M., Image-guided robotic flexible needle steering, IEEE Trans. Robot. 23: 459-466, 2007.
15. Yan K. G., Podder T., Xiao D., Yu Y., Liu T. I., Cheng C., An improved needle steering model with online parameter estimator, Int. J. Comput. Assisted Radiol. Surg. 1: 205-212, 2006.
16. Dehghan E., Goksel O., Salcudean S. E., A comparison of needle bending models, Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 305-312, 2006.
17. DiMaio S. P., Salcudean S. E., Needle steering and model-based trajectory planning, Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 33-40, 2003.
18. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hough transform.
19. Haddadi A., Goksel O., Salcudeen S. E., Hashtrudi-zad K., On the controllability of dynamic model-based needle insertion in soft tissue, Annual Int. Conf. IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 2278-2291, 2010.
20. Lindsey Q. J., Tenenholtz N. A., Lee D. I., Kuchenbecker K. J., Image-enabled force feedback for robotic teleoperation of a flexible surgical tool, in Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. on Robotics and Applications, Vol. 644, No. 033, 2009.
21. Asadian A., Kermani M. R., Patel R. V., An analytical model for deflection of flexible needles during needle insertion, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 2552-2556, 2011.
22. Fung R. F., Chang H. C., Dynamic modeling of a non-linearly constrained flexible manipulator with a tip mass by Hamilton's principle, J. Sound Vib. 16: 751-769, 1998.
23. Giachetta G., Mangiarotti L., Sardanashvili G. A., New Lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods in field theory: Chaps. 3 and 4, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 1997.
24. Low K. H., Vidyasagar M., A Lagrangian formulation of the dynamic model for flexible manipulator systems, ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control 110: 175-181, 1988.
25. Craig J. J., Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd edn., Pearson Education, Inc., p. 182, 2004.
26. Meirovitch L., Computational methods in structural dynamics, Vol. 5, Springer, 1980.
27. Wang D., Vidyagasar M., Transfer functions for a single flexible link, Int. J. Robot. Res. 10(5): 540-549, 1989.
28. Liu J. X., Robot Manipulators: New Research, Chap. 1, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2005.
29. Van De Geer S. A., Least squares estimation, in Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, pp. 1041-1045, 2005.
30. Ivaldi M., Ferdinando A., Hogan N., Bizzi E., Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans, J. Neurosci. 5: 2732-2743, 1985.