Image-enabled force feedback for robotic teleoperation of a flexible surgical tool

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 224-233

  Lindsey, Quentin J ^a   Tenenholtz, Neil A ^a   Lee, David I ^b   Kuchenbecker, Katherine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Force sensing; Haptic feedback; Surgical robotics; Teleoperation

Indexed keywords

BEAM MODEL; CONTACT FORCES; FEEDBACK FORCES; FLEXIBLE TOOL; FORCE ESTIMATION; FORCE FEEDBACK; FORCE GENERATION; FORCE SENSING; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; HUMAN SUBJECTS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PIVOT POINT; ROBOTIC TELEOPERATION; SURGICAL ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TOOLS; TELE-OPERATIONS; TELEOPERATED; TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS; USER CONTROL;

REMOTE CONTROL; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ROBOTS;

EID: 77954186294     PISSN: 1027264X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. A. Beasley and R. D. Howe. Model-based error correction for flexible robotic surgical instruments. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems Conference, June 2005.
2. T. Beléndez, C. Neipp, and A. Beléndez. Large and small deflections of a cantilever beam. European Journal of Physics, 23:371-379, Jan. 2002.
3. R. Costi, J. Himpens, J. Bruyns, and G. B. Cadière. Robotic fundoplication: From theoretic advantages to real problems. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 197(3):500-507, Sept. 2003.
4. P. Dutkiewicz, M. Kietczewski, M. Kowalski, and W. Wroblewski. Experimental verification of visual tracking of surgical tools. In Proc. Fifth International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, pages 237- 242, June 2005.
5. G. S. Guthart and J. K. Salisbury. The Intuitive™ telesurgery system: Overview and application. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 618-621, 2000.
6. C. W. Kennedy, T. Hu, J. P. Desai, A. S. Wechsler, and J. Y. Kresh. A novel approach to robotic cardiac surgery using haptics and vision. Cardiovascular Engineering: An International Journal, 2(1):15-22, March 2002.
7. M. Kitagawa, A. M. Okamura, B. T. Bethea, V. L. Gott, and W. A. Baumgartner. Analysis of suture manipulation forces for teleoperation with force feedback. In Proc. Fifth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Sept. 2002.
8. A. J. Madhani, G. Niemeyer, and J. K. Salisbury. The Black Falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems, volume 2, pages 936-944, 1998.
9. M. Mahvash and A. M. Okamura. Enhancing transparency of a position-exchange teleoperator. In Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conference, pages 470-475, March 2007.
10. M. Mahvash and A. M. Okamura. Friction compensation for enhancing transparency of a teleoperator with compliant transmission. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(6):1240-1246, December 2007.
11. A. M. Okamura. Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Industrial Robot, 31(6):499-508, Dec. 2004.
12. P. Puangmali, K. Althoefer, L. Seneviratne, D. Murphy, and P. Dasgupta. State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sensors Journal, 8(4):371-381, April 2008.
13. C. E. Reiley, T. Akinbiyi, D. Burschka, D. C. Chang, A. M. Okamura, and D. D. Yuh. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 135(1):196-202, Jan. 2008.
14. U. Seibold, B. Kuebler, and G. Hirzinger. Prototype of instrument for minimally invasive surgery with 6- axis force sensing capability. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 496-501, 2005.
15. W. Semere, M. Kitagawa, and A. M. Okamura. Teleoperation with sensor/actuator asymmetry: task performance with partial force feedback. In Proc. IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 121-127, Mar. 2004.
16. G. Tholey, J. Desai, and A. Castellanos. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery. Annals of Surgery, 241(1):102-109, Jan. 2005.
17. G. Tholey, A. Pillarisetti, W. Green, and J. P. Desai. Design, development, and testing of an automated laparoscopic grasper with 3-D force measurement capability. In Proc. International Symposium on Manufacturing Systems, pages 38-48, 2004.
18. C. R.Wagner and R. D. Howe. Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(6):1235-1240, December 2007.
19. C. R. Wagner, N. Stylopoulos, P. G. Jackson, and R. D. Howe. The benefit of force feedback in surgery: Examination of blunt dissection. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(3):252-262, June 2007.
20. N. Zemiti, T. Ortmaier, and G. Morel. A new robot for force control in minimally invasive surgery. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3643-3648, Sendai, Japan, 2004.