Proteome coverage prediction for integrated proteomics datasets

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 283-293

  Claassen, Manfred ^a,b   Aebersold, Ruedi ^b   Buhmann, Joachim M ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Center for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Algorithms; computational molecular biology

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; LEPTOSPIRA INTERROGANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LEPTOSPIRA INTERROGANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 79952379394     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2010.0261     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Antoniak, C.E. 1974. Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to Bayesian nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat. 2, 1152-1174.
2. Beal, M.J., Ghahramani, Z., and Rasmussen, C.E. 2002. The infinite hidden Markov model. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 1, 577-584.
3. Blackwell, D., and MacQueen, J.B. 1973. Ferguson distributions via polya urn schemes. Ann. Stat. 1, 353-355.
4. Brunner, E., Ahrens, C.H., Mohanty, S., et al. 2007. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 576-583. (Pubitemid 46834841)
5. Claassen, M., Aebersold, R., and Buhmann, J.M. 2009. Proteome coverage prediction with infinite Markov models. Bioinformatics 25, i154-i160.
6. Claassen, M., Reiter, L., Hengartner, M.O., et al. 2010. Generic comparison of protein inference engine families. Proc. RECOMB Satellite Comput. Proteomics (in press).
7. Domon, B., and Aebersold, R. 2006. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312, 212-217.
8. Elias, J.E., and Gygi, S.P. 2007. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214. (Pubitemid 46358868)
9. Eriksson, J., and Fenyo, D. 2007. Improving the success rate of proteome analysis by modeling protein-abundance distributions and experimental designs. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 651-655. (Pubitemid 46897209)
10. Karp, R.M. 1972. Reducibility among combinatorial problems, 85-103. In Miller, R.E., and Thatcher, J.W., ed. Complexity of Computer Computations. Plenum Press, New York.
11. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E., et al. 2002. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392. (Pubitemid 35215372)
12. Lange, V., Malmstrom, J.A., Didion, J., et al. 2008. Targeted quantitative analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes virulence factors by multiple reaction monitoring. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7, 1489-1500.
13. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., et al. 2003. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646-4658. (Pubitemid 37082259)
14. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Vitek, O., and Aebersold, R. 2007. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 787-797. (Pubitemid 350055575)
15. Pitman, J. 2002. Combinatorial stochastic processes. [Technical Report 621]. Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Pitman J., and Yor, M. 1997. The two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet distribution derived from a stable subordinator. Ann. Probabil. 25, 855-900.
17. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
18. Reiter, L., Claassen, M., Schrimpf, S.P., et al. 2009. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 2405-2417.
19. Schmidt, A., Gehlenborg, N., Bodenmiller, B., et al. 2008. An integrated, directed mass spectrometric approach for indepth characterization of complex peptide mixtures. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7, 2138-2150.
20. Teh, Y.W. 2006. A hierarchical Bayesian language model based on Pitman-Yor processes. Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Comput. Linguistics 985-992.
21. Teh, Y.W., Jordan, M.I., Beal, M.J., et al. 2006. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101, 1566-1581.