Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 615-624

  D'Arcangelo, Camillo ^a   Zarow, Maciej ^b   De Angelis, Francesco ^a   Vadini, Mirco ^a   Paolantonio, Michele ^a   Giannoni, Mario ^c   D'Amario, Maurizio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b University in Krakow   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adhesive luting; Clinical evaluation; Indirect composite; Onlay; Overlay

Indexed keywords

RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; DENTAL CURING LIGHT; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; CURING LIGHTS, DENTAL; DENTAL CEMENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894569268     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P (2006) A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 37: 139-144.
2. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U (2008) Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence Int 39: 65-71.
3. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16: 33-40.
4. Geurtsen W (2000) Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11: 333-355.
5. Hadis M, Leprince JG, Shortall AC, Devaux J, Leloup G, Palin WM (2011) High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials. J Dent 39: 549-557.
6. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24.
7. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25: 435-440.
8. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Grundler W (1999) Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of class 2 composite restorations. Oper Dent 24: 261-271.
9. Loguercio AD, Alessandra R, Mazzocco KC, Dias AL, Busato ALS, Singer JDM, Rosa P (2002) Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique. J Adhes Dent 4: 137-144.
10. D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Carluccio F, Vitalone LM, D'Amario M (2012) Influence of curing time, overlay material and thickness on three light-curing composites used for luting indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 14: 377-384.
11. Bott B, Hannig M (2003) Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater 19: 264-269.
12. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L (2007) Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 9: 319-326.
13. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone E, Cerutti A (2009) Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent 37: 610-615.
14. D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M (2012) Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 16: 1071-1079.
15. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi GD, Di Bussolo G, De Angelis F, D'Amario M, Caputi S (2009) The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 11: 109-115.
16. Magne P (2005) Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 17: 144-154, discussion 155.
17. D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, D'Amario M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Caputi S (2009) The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 34: 328-336.
18. Cvar JF, Ryge G (2005) Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig 9: 215-232.
19. Huth KC, Chen HY, Mehl A, Hickel R, Manhart J (2011) Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years. J Dent 39: 478-488.
20. Bayne SC, Schmalz G (2005) Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 9: 209-214.
21. Guess PC, Stappert CF (2008) Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 24: 804-813.
22. Roulet JF (1997) Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Investig 1: 40-46.
23. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Hickel R (2010) Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing preparations placed by dental students: results after 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years. Quintessence Int 41: 399-410.
24. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R (2000) Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 84: 289-296.
25. Dukic W, Dukic OL, Milardovic S, Delija B (2010) Clinical evaluation of indirect composite restorations at baseline and 36 months after placement. Oper Dent 35: 156-164.
26. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE (2000) Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 50: 361-366.
27. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F (2000) Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 31: 165-179.
28. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P, Chan D (1999) A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 30: 163-168.
29. Pallesen U, Qvist V (2003) Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 7: 71-79.
30. Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ (2008) The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 12: 53-59.
31. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 35: 897-902.
32. Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM (2001) The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 86: 481-488.
33. Hummel SK, Marker V, Pace L, Goldfogle M (1997) Surface treatment of indirect resin composite surfaces before cementation. J Prosthet Dent 77: 568-572.
34. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM (1989) Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 5: 417-424.
35. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R (1997) Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77: 122-126.
36. Cho S, Rajitrangson P, Matis B, Platt J (2012) Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent 38(3): E1-E9.
37. Caneppele TM, de Souza AC, Batista GR, Borges AB, Torres CR (2012) Influence of Nd: YAG or Er: YAG laser surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composites to resin cement. Lasers surface treatment of indirect resin composites. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 20: 135-140.