Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 319-326

  D'Arcangelo, Camillo ^a   Vanini, Lorenzo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b S Fedele Intelvi ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Composite; Surface treatments; Tensile bond strength

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ADHESIVENESS; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INLAYS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 34447280379     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater 1986;2:153-155.
2. Bailey JH. Porcelain-to-composite bond strengths using four organosilane materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:174-177.
3. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Torney DL. The strength of multilayer and repairedcomposite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:63-67.
4. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res 1984;63:1241-1244.
5. Browne RM, Tobias RS. Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: a review. Endodon Dent Traumatology 1986;2:177-183.
6. Causton BE. Repair of abraded composite fillings. An in vitro study. Br Dent J 1975;139:286-288.
7. Chan KC, Boyer DB. Repair of conventional and microfilled composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:345-350.
8. Davidson CL, Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
9. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerisation shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:11-14.
10. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26:127-138.
11. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P, Chan D. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 yaers. Quintessence Int 1999;30:163-168.
12. Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, Palma-Dibb RG. Shear bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Thermocycling influence. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:727-732.
13. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Den Res 1987;66:1636-1640.
14. Ferracane J, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatment for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-295.
15. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatment on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13:28-35.
16. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaption: direct composite resin vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-155.
17. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:911-916.
18. Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:671-684.
19. Hu X, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:214-220.
20. Hummel SK, Marker V, Pace L, Goldfogle M. Surface treatment of indirect resin composite surfaces before cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:568-572.
21. Kallio TT, Lastumaki TM, Vallittu PK. Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:80-86.
22. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-513.
23. Kato H, Matsumura H, Ide T, Atsuta M. Improved bonding of adhesive resin to sintered porcelain with the combination of acid etching and a two-liquid silane conditioner. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:102-108.
24. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin wear. Quintessence Int 1994;25:53-58.
25. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent 1996;21:59-62.
26. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmayer WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:119-124.
27. Lacy AM, Laluz J, Watanabe LC, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-291.
28. Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW. The tensile strength of composite repairs. J Dent 1980;8:171-177.
29. Martin C, Lopez S, Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(5):481-488.
30. Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation indirect inlay and onlay composite restorations. Pract Parodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:423-431.
31. Ozden AN, Akaltan FR, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:85-88.
32. Park SH. Comparison of degree of conversion for light-cured and additionally heat-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:613-618.
33. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 1991;16:136-140.
34. Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Stephens NH. Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins. Oper Dent 1994;19:217-220.
35. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effect of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-387.
36. Scott JA, Strang R, Saunders WT. The plane of fracture and shear bond strength of three composite inlay systems. Dent Mater 1992;8:208-210.
37. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1998;26:685-694.
38. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Am J Dent 1995;8:149-151.
39. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparison between resin-bonded calss II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations and direct inlays, Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:217-223.
40. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ. Composite inlay/luting resin bond strength - surface treatment effects. J Dent 1996;24:129-135.
41. Söderholm KJ. Flexure strength of repaired dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:364-369.
42. Söderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993;72:1050-1054.
43. Stokes AN, Tay WM, Pereira BP. Shear bond of resin cement to post-cured hybrid composites. Dent Mater 1993;9:370-374.
44. Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surface for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992;8:193-196.
45. Swift EJ Jr, Le Valley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992;8:362-365.
46. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilderding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:355-359.
47. Trajtenberg CP, Powers JM. Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers. Am J Dent 2004;17:123-126.
48. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993;18:187-194.
49. Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Zaimoglu L. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of resin based inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:423-431.
50. Wendt Jr. SL. Microleakage and cups fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Am J Dent 1991;4:10-12.
51. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:258-262.
52. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:228-235.
53. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:184-189.