Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing preparations placed by dental students: Results after 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 399-410

  Manhart, Juergen ^a   Chen, Hong Yan ^a   Mehl, Albert ^b   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clinical study; Composite resin; Inlays; Longevity; USPHS criteria

Indexed keywords

ARTGLASS (DENTAL COMPOSITE); CHARISMA COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS, DENTAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957252442     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study. Quintessence Int 2008; 39:65-71.
2. Kelsey WP, Cavel WT, Blankenau RJ, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM, Latta MA. 4-year clinical study of castable ceramic crowns.Am J Dent 1995;8:259-262.
3. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Keramikinlays und Veneers. München: Hanser-Verlag, 1997.
4. Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJE. Aesthetic inlays:Composite or ceramic. Br Dent J 1994;176:53-60.
5. Davidson CL.Posterior composites: Criteria for assessment. Introduction. Quintessence Int 1987;18:515.
6. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years.Dent Mater 1992; 8:60-64.
7. Ryge G, Cvar JF.Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Dental Health Center, publication 7902244, 1971. San Francisco:US Government Printing Office, 1971.
8. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:5-33.
9. Botelho MG, Chan AW, Yiu EY, Tse ET. Longevity of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.Am J Dent 2002;15:295-299.
10. Mjör IA. A recurring problem: Research in restorative dentistry … but there is a light at the end of the tunnel. J Dent Res 2004;83:92.
11. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT Statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.Ann Intern Med 2001;134:657-662.
12. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
13. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369-377.
14. Ryge G, Stanford JW.Recommended format for protocol of clinical research program: Clinical comparison of several anterior and posterior restorative materials. Int Dent J 1977;27:46-57.
15. Feller RP, Ricks CL, Matthews TG, Santucci EA. Threeyear clinical evaluation of composite formulations for posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:544-550.
16. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjör IA. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981;5:235-239.
17. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991;22:153-157.
18. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P, Chan D. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 1999;30:163-168.
19. Hickel R. Zur Problematik hypersensibler Zähne nach Eingliederung von Adhäsivinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:740-742.
20. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
21. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1714-1723.
22. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Mumesohn M, Pelka M, Hickel R. Langzeiterfahrungen mit einem mikrogefüllten Komposit als Inlaysystem. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:342-344.
23. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations:Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995; 179:343-349.
24. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlay. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:71-79.
25. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of Cerec ceramic inlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
26. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000;50:361-366.
27. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: A literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000;31:165-179.
28. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.Quintessence Int 2001;32:199-205.
29. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, Konig K, Bratschko RO. Klinische und werkstoffkundliche Erfahrungen mit Komposit-, Keramik- und Goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1992;47:18-22.
30. Wiedmer CS, Krejci I, Lutz F.Klinische, röntgenologische und rasterelektronenoptische Untersuchung von Kompositinlays nach fünfjähriger Funktionszeit. Acta Med Dent Helv 1997;2:301-307.
31. Leirskar J, Nordbo H, Thoresen NR, Henaug T, der Fehr FR. A four to six years follow-up of indirect resin composite inlays/onlays. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:247-251.
32. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1998;26:623-626.
33. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
34. Rykke M.Dental materials for posterior restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8:139-148.
35. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:391-397.
36. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R.Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14:95-99.
37. Hickel R. Glass ionomers, cermets, hybrid ionomers and compomers-(Long-term) clinical evaluation. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:105-129.