Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 7-24

  Cvar, John F ^b   Ryge, Gunmar ^b   Schmalz, Gottfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; HISTORY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD;

DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GUIDELINES; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 31044450456     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. MORGAN, S. C.: Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Anterior Restorative Materials. Residency Report, Dental Health Center, San Francisco, California, 1966.
2. PARKER, W. A.: A Study of Criteria for Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Restorative Materials. Residency Report, Dental Health Center, San Francisco, California, 1967.
3. HOROWITZ, H. S. and PETERSON, J. K.: Evaluation of Examiner Variability and the Use of Radiographs in Determining the Efficacy of Community Fluoridation, Archs Oral Biol., II: 867-875,1966.
4. MARKEN, K.-E.: The Training of Observers, pp., 81-87. In Advances in Fluorine Research and Dental Caries Prevention, Vol. 4, Proceeding of the 12th Congress of the European Organization for Research on Fluorine and Dental Caries Prevention, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 8-11 June, 1965, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1966.
5. GUILFORD, J. P.: Psychometric Methods, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., p. 292, 1954.
6. PHILLIPS, R. W., BOYD, D. A., HEALEY, N. J., and CRAWFORD, W. H.: Clinical Observations on Amalgams with Known Physical Properties, J. Dent. Res., 22: 167-172, 1943.
7. WILSON, C. J. and RYGE, G.: Clinical Study of Dental Amalgam, J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 66: 673-771, 1963.
8. PAFFENBARGER, G. C., SCHOONOVER, I. C., and SOUDER, W.: Dental Silicate Cements: Physical and Chemical Properties and a Specification, J. Amer. Dent. Ass., Vol. 25, January 1938.
9. CIVJAN, S. and BRAUER, G. M.: Physical Properties of Cements Based on Zinc Oxide, Hydrogenated Rosin, o-Ethoxybenzoic Acid, and Eugenol, J. Dent. Res., 43: 281-299, 1964.
10. CIVJAN, S. and BRAUER, G. M.: Clinical Behavior of o-Ethoxybenzoid Acid - Eugenol - Zinc Oxide Cements, J. Dent. Res. 44: 80-83, 1965.
11. MACRAE, P. D., ZACHERL, W., and CASTALDI, C. R.: A Study of Defects in Class II Dental Amalgam Restorations in Deciduous Molars, J. Canad. Dent. Ass., 28: 491-502, 1962.
12. GOING, R. E., MASSLER, J., and DUTE, H. L.: Marginal Penetration of Dental Restorations by Different Radioactive Isotopes, J. Dent. Res., 39: 273-284, 1960.
13. RYGE, G.: Dental Materials, pp., 253-267. In Goldman, H. M., Forrest, S. P., Byrd, D. L., and McDonald, R. E. (eds.): Current Therapy in Dentistry, Vol. 3. Saint Louis, The C. V. Mosby Company, 1968.
14. CHILTON, N. W.: Design and Analysis in Dental and Oral Research. J. B. Lippincott, 1967.
15. ARMITAGE, P.: Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and Frequencies, Biometrics, 11: 375-386, Sept. 1955.
16. KISH, L.: Some Statistical Problems in Research Design, Amer. Soc. Review, 24: 328-388, June, 1959.