The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-59

  Fonseca, Rodrigo Borges ^a   Correr Sobrinho, Lourenço ^a   Fernandes Neto, Alfredo Júlio ^b   Quagliatto, Paulo Sérgio ^b   Soares, Carlos José ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cavity preparation design; Indirect composite resin; Inlay; Marginal accuracy; Onlay

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR, THIRD; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 39349099948     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-007-0145-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR (1999) Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 26:582-593
2. Burke FJ (1992) Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 20:131-139
3. Burke FJ (1996) Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: The effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 27:115-121
4. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC (1993) The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays. Oper Dent 18:230-236
5. Cho L, Choi J, Yi YJ, Park CJ (2004) Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/ fiber-reinforced composite crowns. J Prosthet Dent 91:554-560
6. Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S (2002) Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: Effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 88:388-395
7. Duke P, Moore BK, Haug SP, Andres CJ (2000) Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 83:466-473
8. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH (2004) Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 17:313-317
9. Ferracane JL (2005) Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 21:36-42
10. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Yoruc AB, Alkumru HN (1997) Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. J Oral Rehabil 24:646-651
11. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H (2000) Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 83:40-49
12. Hayashi M, Miura M, Nishimura N, Takeshige F, Ebisu S (2000) Effects of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of Class II (MO and MOD) fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 25:549-555
13. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405-408
14. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G (1992) Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 20:171-177
15. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC (2004) Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 20:3-11
16. Jahangiri L, Wahlers C, Hittelman E, Matheson P (2005) Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation of cast restoration marginal accuracy compared to stereomicroscopy. J Prosthet Dent 93:138-142
17. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC (2003) In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater 19:393-398
18. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF (1994) Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 25:53-58
19. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E (2003) Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 28:127-135
20. Krejci I, Lutz F, Gautschi L (1994) Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 72:233-244
21. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME (1989) A new method for generating ceramic restorations: A CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 118:703-707
22. Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G (1998) In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 6:55-62
23. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM (2001) A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 85:386-395
24. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107-111
25. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB (1980) Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 43:419-422
26. Noack MJ, Roulet JF (1991) Tooth-colored inlays. Curr Opin Dent 1:172-178
27. O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF (1993) Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 124:48-54
28. Ortega VL, Pegoraro LF, Conti PC, do Valle AL, Bonfante G (2004) Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 31:393-397
29. Pallesen U, Qvist V (2003) Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 7:71-79
30. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32:109-115
31. Sjogren G (1995) Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 53:24-28
32. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fernandes Neto AJ, Giannini M (2003) Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. Oper Dent 28:689-694
33. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes Neto AJ (2006) Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 95:421-429
34. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR (2005) Mechanical properties of light-cured composites polymerized with several additional post-curing methods. Oper Dent 30:389-394
35. Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonseca RB (2005) Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: A literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:224-235
36. Stansbury JW, Trujillo-Lemon M, Lu H, Ding X, Lin Y, Ge J (2005) Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dent Mater 21:56-67
37. Steele A, Johnson BR (1999) In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod 25:6-8
38. Taylor MJ, Lynch E (1993) Marginal adaptation. J Dent 21:265-273
39. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P (1994) Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study. J Dent 22:147-153
40. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Roulet JF, Vanherle G (1992) Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 20:18-26
41. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH (1998) Do dental composites always shrink toward the light. J Dent Res 77:1435-1445
42. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB (2003) In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 90:459-464