Influence of curing time, overlay material and thickness on three light-curing composites used for luting indirect composite restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 377-384

  D’Arcangelo, Camillo ^a   De Angelis, Francesco ^a   Vadini, Mirco ^a   Carluccio, Fabio ^a   Vitalone, Laura Merla ^a   D’Amario, Maurizio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Indirect composite restoration; Luting; Vickers hardness

Indexed keywords

2,2 BIS (4 (2 METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; 2,2-BIS-(4-(2-METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTAL MATERIAL; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ENABOND; ESTHET X; ESTHET-X; GLASS; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; XP BOND; XP-BOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; POLYMERIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERIZATION; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84867849669     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a22765     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone E, Cerutti A. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: A micro-Raman analysis. J Dent 2009;37:610-615.
2. Aguiar FH, Lazzari CR, Lima DA, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing tip distance and resin shade on microhardness of a hybrid resin composite. Braz Oral Res 2005;19:302-306.
3. Bhamra GS, Fleming GJ, Darvell BW. Influence of LED irradiance on flexural properties and Vickers hardness of resin-based composite materials. Dent Mater 2010;26:148-155.
4. Bott B, Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater 2003;19:264-269.
5. Cavalcante LM, Valentino TA, Carlini B Jr, Silikas N, Pimenta LA. Influence of different exposure time required to stabilize hardness values of composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:42-50.
6. Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Tafalla H, Martínez A, Flores J, Rodríguez J. Curing effectiveness of resin composites at different exposure times using LED and halogen units. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:E51-56.
7. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:319-326.
8. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, D’Amario M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Caputi S. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34:328-336.
9. David JR, Gomes OM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of exposure time on curing efficiency of polymerizing units equipped with lightemitting diodes. J Oral Sci 2007;49:19-24.
10. de Jong LC, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JJ, Wolke JG, Geitenbeek B. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2007;35:513-520.
11. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:727-730.
12. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dent Mater 2003;19:270-276.
13. Hooshmand T, Mahmoodi N, Keshvad A. Microhardness of a resin cement polymerized by light-emitting diode and halogen lights through ceramic. J Prosthodont 2009;18:411-416.
14. Ilie N, Hickel R, Watts DC. Spatial and cure-time distribution of dynamicmechanical properties of a dimethacrylate nano-composite. Dent Mater 2009;25:411-418.
15. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2001;17:347-353.
16. Lindberg A, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW. Effect of power density of curing unit, exposure duration, and light guide distance on composite depth of cure. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:71-76.
17. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behaviour of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
18. Mitchem JC, Wagner PC, Ferracane JL. Marginal adaptation of the Concept inlay system. Am J Dent 1994;7:232-234.
19. Musanje L, Darvell BW. Curing-light attenuation in filled resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 2006;22:804-817.
20. Neo BJ, Soh MS, Teo JW, Yap AU. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different light-curing regimes. Oper Dent 2005;30:671-675.
21. Ozyesil AG, Usumez A, Gunduz B. The efficiency of different light sources to polymerize composite beneath a simulated ceramic restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:151-157.
22. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent 1990;15:129-135.
23. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights. Biomaterials 2004;25:4465-4477.
24. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Evaluation of a second-generation LED curing light. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:666.
25. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Baidas KM. Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:81-84.
26. Rode KM, de Freitas PM, Lloret PR, Powell LG, Turbino ML. Microhardness evaluation of a micro-hybrid composite resin light cured with halogen light, light-emitting diode and argon ion laser. Lasers Med Sci 2009;24:87-92.
27. Rode KM, Kawano Y, Turbino ML. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent 2007;32:571-578.
28. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988;67:932-937.
29. Rueggeberg FA, Hashinger DT, Fairhurst CW. Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. Dent Mater 1990;6:241-249.
30. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resincomposite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-296.
31. Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Mills RW. Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerisation of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerisation potential. Biomaterials 2000;21:1379-1385.
32. Torno V, Soares P, Martin JM, Mazur RF, Souza EM, Vieira S. Effects of irradiance, wavelength, and thermal emission of different light curing units on the Knoop and Vickers hardness of a composite resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:166-171.
33. Yap AU, Soh MS. Curing efficacy of a new generation high-power LED lamp. Oper Dent 2005;30:758-763.
34. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1165-1173.