Genome regulation at the peripheral zone: Lamina associated domains in development and disease

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 50-61

  Luperchio, Teresa R ^a   Wong, Xianrong ^a   Reddy, Karen L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA;

ANIMALS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENOME; HUMANS; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION;

EID: 84893968621     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.021     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Comings D.E. Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 1980, 53:131-143.
2. Boveri T. Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren 1914, G. Fischer, Jena.
3. Heitz E. Heterochromatin, Chromocentren, Chromomeren. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 1929, 47:274-284.
4. Cremer T., Cremer C. Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part I. The rise of chromosome territories. Eur J Histochem 2006, 50:161-176.
5. Cremer T., Cremer C. Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective Part II. Fall and resurrection of chromosome territories during the 1950 to 1980. Part III. Chromosome territories and the functional nuclear architecture: experiments and m. Eur J Histochem 2006, 50:223-272.
6. Mao Y.S., Zhang B., Spector D.L. Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. Trends Genet 2011, 27:295-306.
7. Reddy K.L., Zullo J.M., Bertolino E., Singh H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008, 452:243-247.
8. Kosak S.T., Skok J.A., Medina K.L., Riblet R., Le Beau M.M., Fisher A.G., Singh H. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 2002, 296:158-162.
9. Szczerbal I., Foster H.a., Bridger J.M. The spatial repositioning of adipogenesis genes is correlated with their expression status in a porcine mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis model system. Chromosoma 2009, 118:647-663.
10. Williams R.R.E., Azuara V., Perry P., Sauer S., Dvorkina M., Jørgensen H., Roix J., McQueen P., Misteli T., Merkenschlager M., et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J Cell Sci 2006, 119:132-140.
11. Kumaran R.I., Spector D.L. A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol 2008, 180:51-65.
12. Meister P., Towbin B.D., Pike B.L., Ponti A., Gasser S.M. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev 2010, 24:766-782.
13. Vogel M.J., Peric-Hupkes D., van Steensel B. Detection of in vivo protein-DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:1467-1478.
14. Guelen L., Pagie L., Brasset E., Meuleman W., Faza M.B., Talhout W., Eussen B.H., de Klein A., Wessels L., de Laat W., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.
15. Zullo J.M., Demarco I.a., Piqué-Regi R., Gaffney D.J., Epstein C.B., Spooner C.J., Luperchio T.R., Bernstein B.E., Pritchard J.K., Reddy K.L., et al. DNA sequence-dependent compartmentalization and silencing of chromatin at the nuclear lamina. Cell 2012, 149:1474-1487.
16. Peric-Hupkes D., Meuleman W., Pagie L., Bruggeman S.W.M., Solovei I., Brugman W., Gräf S., Flicek P., Kerkhoven R.M., van Lohuizen M., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010, 38:603-613.
17. Meuleman W., Peric-Hupkes D., Kind J., Beaudry J.-B., Pagie L., Kellis M., Reinders M., Wessels L., van Steensel B. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res 2013, 23:270-280.
18. Yao J., Fetter R.D., Hu P., Betzig E., Tjian R. Subnuclear segregation of genes and core promoter factors in myogenesis. Genes Dev 2011, 25:569-580.
19. Brickner D.G., Ahmed S., Meldi L., Thompson A., Light W., Young M., Hickman T.L., Chu F., Fabre E., Brickner J.H. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev Cell 2012, 22:1234-1246.
20. Finlan L.E., Sproul D., Thomson I., Boyle S., Kerr E., Perry P., Ylstra B., Chubb J.R., Bickmore W.A. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000039.
21. Gruenbaum Y., Margalit A. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6:21-31.
22. Wilson K.L., Berk J.M. The nuclear envelope at a glance. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:1973-1978.
23. Guarda A., Bolognese F., Bonapace I.M., Badaracco G. Interaction between the inner nuclear membrane lamin B receptor and the heterochromatic methyl binding protein, MeCP2. Exp Cell Res 2009, 315:1895-1903.
24. Ye Q. Domain-specific interactions of human HP1-type chromodomain proteins and inner nuclear membrane protein LBR. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:14983-14989.
25. Haraguchi T., Holaska J.M., Yamane M., Koujin T., Hashiguchi N., Mori C., Wilson K.L., Hiraoka Y. Emerin binding to Btf, a death-promoting transcriptional repressor, is disrupted by a missense mutation that causes Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Eur J Biochem 2004, 271:1035-1045.
26. Holaska J.M., Lee K.K., Kowalski A.K., Wilson K.L. Transcriptional repressor germ cell-less (GCL) and barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) compete for binding to emerin in vitro. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:6969-6975.
27. Wen B., Wu H., Shinkai Y., Irizarry R.A., Feinberg A.P. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2009, 41:246-250.
28. Kind J., Pagie L., Ortabozkoyun H., Boyle S., de Vries S.S., Janssen H., Amendola M., Nolen L.D., Bickmore W.A., van Steensel B. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 2013, 153:178-192.
29. Towbin B.D., González-Aguilera C., Sack R., Gaidatzis D., Kalck V., Meister P., Askjaer P., Gasser S.M. Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell 2012, 150:934-947.
30. De Wit E., Bouwman B.A.M., Zhu Y., Klous P., Splinter E., Verstegen M.J.A.M., Krijger P.H.L., Festuccia N., Nora E.P., Welling M., et al. The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors. Nature 2013, 501:227-231.
31. Wen B., Wu H., Loh Y.-H., Briem E., Daley G.Q., Feinberg A.P. Euchromatin islands in large heterochromatin domains are enriched for CTCF binding and differentially DNA-methylated regions. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:566.
32. Dixon J.R., Selvaraj S., Yue F., Kim A., Li Y., Shen Y., Hu M., Liu J.S., Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380.
33. Nora E.P., Lajoie B.R., Schulz E.G., Giorgetti L., Okamoto I., Servant N., Piolot T., van Berkum N.L., Meisig J., Sedat J., et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012, 485:381-385.
34. Handoko L., Xu H., Li G., Ngan C.Y., Chew E., Schnapp M., Lee C.W.H., Ye C., Ping J.L.H., Mulawadi F., et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 2011, 43:630-638.
35. Phillips-Cremins J.E., Sauria M.E.G., Sanyal A., Gerasimova T.I., Lajoie B.R., Bell J.S.K., Ong C.-T., Hookway T.A., Guo C., Sun Y., et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 2013, 153:1281-1295.
36. Sexton T., Yaffe E., Kenigsberg E., Bantignies F., Leblanc B., Hoichman M., Parrinello H., Tanay A., Cavalli G. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 2012, 148:458-472.
37. Li Y., Huang W., Niu L., Umbach D.M., Covo S., Li L. Characterization of constitutive CTCF/cohesin loci: a possible role in establishing topological domains in mammalian genomes. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:553.
38. Wang J., Kumar R.M., Biggs V.J., Lee H., Chen Y., Kagey M.H., Young R.A., Abate-Shen C. The Msx1 homeoprotein recruits polycomb to the nuclear periphery during development. Dev Cell 2011, 21:575-588.
39. Korfali N., Wilkie G.S., Swanson S.K., Srsen V., de Las Heras J., Batrakou D.G., Malik P., Zuleger N., Kerr A.R.W., Florens L., et al. The nuclear envelope proteome differs notably between tissues. Nucleus 2012, 3:552-564.
40. Solovei I., Wang A.S., Thanisch K., Schmidt C.S., Krebs S., Zwerger M., Cohen T.V., Devys D., Foisner R., Peichl L., et al. LBR and lamin A/C sequentially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation. Cell 2013, 152:584-598.
41. Olins A.L., Olins D.E. Cytoskeletal influences on nuclear shape in granulocytic HL-60 cells. BMC Cell Biol 2004, 5:30.
42. Olins A.L., Herrmann H., Lichter P., Olins D.E. Retinoic acid differentiation of HL-60 cells promotes cytoskeletal polarization. Exp Cell Res 2000, 254:130-142.
43. Gaines P., Tien C.W., Olins A.L., Olins D.E., Shultz L.D., Carney L., Berliner N. Mouse neutrophils lacking lamin B-receptor expression exhibit aberrant development and lack critical functional responses. Exp Hematol 2008, 36:965-976.
44. Zwerger M., Herrmann H., Gaines P., Olins A.L., Olins D.E. Granulocytic nuclear differentiation of lamin B receptor-deficient mouse EPRO cells. Exp Hematol 2008, 36:977-987.
45. Korfali N., Wilkie G.S., Swanson S.K., Srsen V., Batrakou D.G., Fairley E.A.L., Malik P., Zuleger N., Goncharevich A., de Las Heras J., et al. The leukocyte nuclear envelope proteome varies with cell activation and contains novel transmembrane proteins that affect genome architecture. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:2571-2585.
46. Scaffidi P., Misteli T. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 2006, 312:1059-1063.
47. Scaffidi P., Misteli T. Reversal of the cellular phenotype in the premature aging disease Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nat Med 2005, 11:440-445.
48. Zhang J., Lian Q., Zhu G., Zhou F., Sui L., Tan C., Mutalif R.A., Navasankari R., Zhang Y., Tse H.-F., et al. A human iPSC model of Hutchinson Gilford progeria reveals vascular smooth muscle and mesenchymal stem cell defects. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:31-45.
49. Liu G.-H., Barkho B.Z., Ruiz S., Diep D., Qu J., Yang S.-L., Panopoulos A.D., Suzuki K., Kurian L., Walsh C., et al. Recapitulation of premature ageing with iPSCs from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature 2011, 472:221-225.
50. Zuleger N., Boyle S., Kelly D.A., de Las Heras J.I., Lazou V., Korfali N., Batrakou D.G., Randles K.N., Morris G.E., Harrison D.J., et al. Specific nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins can promote the location of chromosomes to and from the nuclear periphery. Genome Biol 2013, 14:R14.
51. Olins A.L., Rhodes G., Welch D.B.M., Zwerger M., Olins D.E. Lamin B receptor multi-tasking at the nuclear envelope. Nucleus 2010, 1:53-70.
52. Solovei I., Kreysing M., LanctÔt C., Kösem S., Peichl L., Cremer T., Guck J., Joffe B. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 2009, 137:356-368.
53. Berk J.M., Tifft K.E., Wilson K.L. The nuclear envelope LEM-domain protein emerin. Nucleus 2013, 4:298-314.
54. Almouzni G., Alt F., Hübner M.R., Eckersley-Maslin M.A., Spector D.L. Chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013, 23:89-95.
55. Matharu N.K., Hussain T., Sankaranarayanan R., Mishra R.K. Vertebrate homologue of Drosophila GAGA factor. J Mol Biol 2010, 400:434-447.
56. Melnick A., Carlile G., Ahmad K.F., Kiang C.-L., Corcoran C., Bardwell V., Prive G.G., Licht J.D. Critical residues within the BTB domain of PLZF and Bcl-6 modulate interaction with corepressors. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:1804-1818.
57. Kimura T., Ito C., Watanabe S., Takahashi T., Ikawa M., Yomogida K., Fujita Y., Ikeuchi M., Asada N., Matsumiya K., et al. Mouse germ cell-less as an essential component for nuclear integrity. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23:1304-1315.
58. Boulay G., Dubuissez M., Van Rechem C., Forget A., Helin K., Ayrault O., Leprince D. Hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1) recruits polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to a subset of its target genes through interaction with human polycomb-like (hPCL) proteins. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:10509-10524.
59. Kohwi M., Lupton J.R., Lai S-L., Miller M.R., Doe C.Q. Developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization restricts neural progenitor competence in Drosophila. Cell 2013, 152:97-108.
60. Lehmann M., Siegmund T., Lintermann K.G., Korge G. The pipsqueak protein of Drosophila melanogaster binds to GAGA sequences through a novel DNA-binding domain. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:28504-28509.
61. Reddy K.L., Feinberg A.P. Higher order chromatin organization in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2013, 23:109-115.
62. Timp W., Feinberg A.P. Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nat Rev Cancer 2013, 13:497-510.
63. Pujadas E., Feinberg A.P. Regulated noise in the epigenetic landscape of development and disease. Cell 2012, 148:1123-1131.
64. Dumont N., Wilson M.B., Crawford Y.G., Reynolds P.A., Sigaroudinia M., Tlsty T.D. Sustained induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition activates DNA methylation of genes silenced in basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:14867-14872.
65. Hon G.C., Hawkins R.D., Caballero O.L., Lo C., Lister R., Pelizzola M., Valsesia A., Ye Z., Kuan S., Edsall L.E., et al. Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to repressive chromatin domain formation and gene silencing in breast cancer. Genome Res 2012, 22:246-258.
66. Hansen K.D., Timp W., Bravo H.C., Sabunciyan S., Langmead B., McDonald O.G., Wen B., Wu H., Liu Y., Diep D., et al. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat Genet 2011, 43:768-775.
67. Berman B.P., Weisenberger D.J., Aman J.F., Hinoue T., Ramjan Z., Liu Y., Noushmehr H., Lange C.P.E., van Dijk C.M., Tollenaar R.A.E.M., et al. Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina-associated domains. Nat Genet 2012, 44:40-46.
68. Kalluri R., Weinberg R.A. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 2009, 119:1420-1428.
69. McDonald O.G., Wu H., Timp W., Doi A., Feinberg A.P. Genome-scale epigenetic reprogramming during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:867-874.
70. Nagano A., Arahata K. Nuclear envelope proteins and associated diseases. Curr Opin Neurol 2000, 13:533-539.
71. Worman H.J. Nuclear lamins and laminopathies. J Pathol 2012, 226:316-325.
72. Holt I., Clements L., Manilal S., Brown S.C., Morris G.E. The R482Q lamin A/C mutation that causes lipodystrophy does not prevent nuclear targeting of lamin A in adipocytes or its interaction with emerin. Eur J Hum Genet 2001, 9:204-208.
73. Magracheva E., Kozlov S., Stewart C.L., Wlodawer A., Zdanov A. Structure of the lamin A/C R482W mutant responsible for dominant familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD). Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2009, 65:665-670.
74. Bonne G., Di Barletta M.R., Varnous S., Becane H.M., Hammouda E.H., Merlini L., Muntoni F., Greenberg C.R., Gary F., Urtizberea J.A., et al. Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C cause autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet 1999, 21:285-288.
75. Raffaele Di Barletta M., Ricci E., Galluzzi G., Tonali P., Mora M., Morandi L., Romorini A., Voit T., Orstavik K.H., Merlini L., et al. Different mutations in the LMNA gene cause autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 66:1407-1412.
76. Muchir A., Bonne G., van der Kooi A.J., van Meegen M., Baas F., Bolhuis P.A., de Visser M., Schwartz K. Identification of mutations in the gene encoding lamins A/C in autosomal dominant limb girdle muscular dystrophy with atrioventricular conduction disturbances (LGMD1B). Hum Mol Genet 2000, 9:1453-1459.
77. Lin F., Worman H. Structural organization of the human gene encoding nuclear lamin A and nuclear lamin C. J Biol Chem 1993, 268:16321-16326.
78. Fatkin D., MacRae C., Sasaki T., Wolff M.R., Porcu M., Frenneaux M., Atherton J., Vidaillet H.J., Spudich S., De Girolami U., et al. Missense mutations in the rod domain of the lamin A/C gene as causes of dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction-system disease. N Engl J Med 1999, 341:1715-1724.
79. De Sandre-Giovannoli A., Chaouch M., Kozlov S., Vallat J.-M., Tazir M., Kassouri N., Szepetowski P., Hammadouche T., Vandenberghe A., Stewart C.L., et al. Homozygous defects in LMNA, encoding lamin A/C nuclear-envelope proteins, cause autosomal recessive axonal neuropathy in human (Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder type 2) and mouse. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 70:726-736.
80. Novelli G., Muchir A., Sangiuolo F., Helbling-Leclerc A., D'Apice M.R., Massart C., Capon F., Sbraccia P., Federici M., Lauro R., et al. Mandibuloacral dysplasia is caused by a mutation in LMNA-encoding lamin A/C. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 71:426-431.
81. Eriksson M., Brown W.T., Gordon L.B., Glynn M.W., Singer J., Scott L., Erdos M.R., Robbins C.M., Moses T.Y., Berglund P., et al. Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature 2003, 423:293-298.
82. Holt I., Ostlund C., Stewart C.L., Man N.t., Worman H.J., Morris G.E. Effect of pathogenic mis-sense mutations in lamin A on its interaction with emerin in vivo. J Cell Sci 2003, 116:3027-3035.
83. Glynn M.W., Glover T.W. Incomplete processing of mutant lamin A in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria leads to nuclear abnormalities, which are reversed by farnesyltransferase inhibition. Hum Mol Genet 2005, 14:2959-2969.
84. Hennekam R.C.M. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype. Am J Med Genet A 2006, 140:2603-2624.
85. McClintock D., Ratner D., Lokuge M., Owens D.M., Gordon L.B., Collins F.S., Djabali K. The mutant form of lamin A that causes Hutchinson-Gilford progeria is a biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1269.
86. Goldman R.D., Shumaker D.K., Erdos M.R., Eriksson M., Goldman A.E., Gordon L.B., Gruenbaum Y., Khuon S., Mendez M., Varga R., et al. Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:8963-8968.
87. McCord R.P., Nazario-Toole A., Zhang H., Chines P.S., Zhan Y., Erdos M.R., Collins F.S., Dekker J., Cao K. Correlated alterations in genome organization, histone methylation, and DNA-lamin A/C interactions in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Genome Res 2013, 23:260-269.
88. Shumaker D.K., Dechat T., Kohlmaier A., Adam S.A., Bozovsky M.R., Erdos M.R., Eriksson M., Goldman A.E., Khuon S., Collins F.S., et al. Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:8703-8708.
89. Kelley J.B., Datta S., Snow C.J., Chatterjee M., Ni L., Spencer A., Yang C.-S., Cubeñas-Potts C., Matunis M.J., Paschal B.M. The defective nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome disrupts the nucleocytoplasmic Ran gradient and inhibits nuclear localization of Ubc9. Mol Cell Biol 2011, 31:3378-3395.
90. Shah P.P., Donahue G., Otte G.L., Capell B.C., Nelson D.M., Cao K., Aggarwala V., Cruickshanks H.a., Rai T.S., McBryan T., et al. Lamin B1 depletion in senescent cells triggers large-scale changes in gene expression and the chromatin landscape. Genes Dev 2013, 10.1101/gad.223834.113.