The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors

Nature

Volumn 501, Issue 7466, 2013, Pages 227-231

  De Wit, Elzo ^a   Bouwman, Britta A M ^a   Zhu, Yun ^a   Klous, Petra ^a   Splinter, Erik ^a   Verstegen, Marjon J A M ^a   Krijger, Peter H L ^a   Festuccia, Nicola ^b   Nora, Elphège P ^c   Welling, Maaike ^a   Heard, Edith ^c   Geijsen, Niels ^a,d   Poot, Raymond A ^e   Chambers, Ian ^b   De Laat, Wouter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

CHROMOSOME; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE; GENOME; PROTEIN; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); STEM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SPECIFICITY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENHANCER REGION; GENE INTERACTION; GENOME; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; GENOME; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84884134904     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12420     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
2. Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
3. de Wit, E. & de Laat, W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 26, 11-24 (2012).
4. van Steensel, B. & Dekker, J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 1089-1095 (2010).
5. Splinter, E. & de Laat, W. The complex transcription regulatory landscape of our genome: control in three dimensions. EMBO J. 30, 4345-4355 (2011).
6. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
7. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
8. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-1311 (2002).
9. Splinter, E. et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371-1383 (2011).
10. Splinter, E., de Wit, E., van deWerken, H. J., Klous, P.&de Laat, W.Determining longrange chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: from fixation to computation. Methods 58, 221-230 (2012).
11. Wutz, A., Rasmussen, T. P. & Jaenisch, R. Chromosomal silencing and localization aremediated by different domains of XistRNA. Nature Genet. 30, 167-174(2002).
12. McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010).
13. Apostolou, E. et al. Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12, 699-712 (2013).
14. Handoko, L. et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nature Genet. 43, 630-638 (2011).
15. Lin, Y. C. et al. Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate Bcell fate. NatureImmunol. 13, 1196-1204 (2012).
16. Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84-98 (2012).
17. Shen, Y. et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116-120 (2012).
18. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000).
19. Chambers, I. et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230-1234 (2007).
20. Holwerda, S. J. et al. Allelic exclusion of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is independent of its nuclear localization in mature B cells. Nucleic Acids Res. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt491 (7 June 2013).
21. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature Genet. 42, 53-61 (2010).
22. Xu, M. & Cook, P. R. Similar active genes cluster in specialized transcription factories. J. Cell Biol. 181, 615-623 (2008).
23. Dhar, S. S. & Wong-Riley, M. T. Chromosome conformation capture of transcriptional interactions between cytochrome c oxidase genes and genes of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in neurons. J. Neurochem. 115, 676-683 (2010).
24. Krijger, P. H. & de Laat, W. Identical cells with different 3D genomes; cause and consequences? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 191-196 (2013).
25. Noordermeer, D. et al. Variegated gene expression caused by cell-specific longrange DNA interactions. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 944-951 (2011).
26. Kind, J. et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153, 178-192 (2013).
27. Feng, B. et al. Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 197-203 (2009).
28. Karantzali, E. et al. Sall1 regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation in association with nanog. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 1037-1045 (2011).
29. Parisi, S. et al. Klf5 is involved in self-renewal ofmouseembryonic stemcells. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2629-2634 (2008).
30. Smith, A. G. Culture and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J. Tissue Cult. Methods 13, 89-94 (1991).
31. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603-613 (2010).
32. Warlich, E. et al. Lentiviral vector design and imaging approaches to visualize the early stages of cellular reprogramming. Mol. Ther. 19, 782-789 (2011).
33. Andrews, N. C. & Faller, D. V. A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499 (1991).
34. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685 (1970).
35. Wilson, A. A. et al. Sustained expression of a1-antitrypsin after transplantation of manipulated hematopoietic stem cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 39, 133-141 (2008).
36. Marson, A. et al.Connecting microRNAgenes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521-533 (2008).
37. Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931-21936 (2010).
38. Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430-435 (2010).
39. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
40. Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766-770 (2008).