Planting the seed: Target recognition of short guide RNAs

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 74-83

  Künne, Tim ^a   Swarts, Daan C ^a   Brouns, Stan J J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argonaute; Cas9; Cascade; CRISPR; Hfq; RNAi

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT RNA; HFQ PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; RNA; SMALL REGULATORY RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BASE MISPAIRING; BASE PAIRING; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; RNA BINDING; RNA CLEAVAGE; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TRANSLATION REGULATION;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

ARGONAUTE; CAS9; CASCADE; CRISPR; HFQ; RNAI;

BASE PAIRING; DNA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RNA, GUIDE; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 84893693085     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: 18784380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136:215-233.
2. Juliano C., et al. Uniting germline and stem cells: the function of Piwi proteins and the piRNA pathway in diverse organisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45:447-469.
3. Ketting R.F. The many faces of RNAi. Dev. Cell 2011, 20:148-161.
4. Siomi H., Siomi M.C. On the road to reading the RNA-interference code. Nature 2009, 457:396-404.
5. Storz G., et al. Regulation by small RNAs in bacteria: expanding frontiers. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:880-891.
6. Waters L.S., Storz G. Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell 2009, 136:615.
7. Sorek R., et al. CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82:237-266.
8. Westra E.R., et al. The CRISPRs, they are a-Changin': how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2012, 46:311-339.
9. Vourekas A., et al. Mili and Miwi target RNA repertoire reveals piRNA biogenesis and function of Miwi in spermiogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:773-781.
10. Brennecke J., et al. Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e85. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030085.
11. Lewis B.P., et al. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 2003, 115:787-798.
12. Wee L.M., et al. Argonaute divides its RNA guide into domains with distinct functions and RNA-binding properties. Cell 2012, 151:1055-1067.
13. Chorn G., et al. Persistence of seed-based activity following segmentation of a microRNA guide strand. RNA 2010, 16:2336-2340.
14. Doench J.G., Sharp P.A. Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:504-511.
15. Grimson A., et al. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:91-105.
16. Ui-Tei K., et al. Thermodynamic stability and Watson-Crick base pairing in the seed duplex are major determinants of the efficiency of the siRNA-based off-target effect. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:7100-7109.
17. Schwarz D.S., et al. Designing siRNA that distinguish between genes that differ by a single nucleotide. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e140. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020140.
18. Yekta S., et al. MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science 2004, 304:594-596.
19. Lewis B.P., et al. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 2005, 120:15-20.
20. Friedman R.C., et al. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009, 19:92-105.
21. Ameres S.L., et al. Molecular basis for target RNA recognition and cleavage by human RISC. Cell 2007, 130:101-112.
22. Elbashir S.M., et al. Functional anatomy of siRNAs for mediating efficient RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster embryo lysate. EMBO J. 2001, 20:6877-6888.
23. Hutvágner G., Zamore P.D. A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 2002, 297:2056-2060.
24. Dahlgren C., et al. Analysis of siRNA specificity on targets with double-nucleotide mismatches. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:e53. 10.1093/nar/gkn190.
25. Haley B., Zamore P.D. Kinetic analysis of the RNAi enzyme complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11:599-606.
26. Nakanishi K., et al. Structure of yeast Argonaute with guide RNA. Nature 2012, 486:368-374.
27. Pusch O., et al. Nucleotide sequence homology requirements of HIV-1-specific short hairpin RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:6444-6449.
28. Elkayam E., et al. The structure of human Argonaute-2 in complex with miR-20a. Cell 2012, 150:100-110.
29. Schirle N.T., MacRae I.J. The crystal structure of human Argonaute2. Science 2012, 336:1037-1040.
30. Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116:281-297.
31. Khvorova A., et al. Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell 2003, 115:209-216.
32. Schwarz D.S., et al. Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex. Cell 2003, 115:199-208.
33. Hibio N., et al. Stability of miRNA 5'terminal and seed regions is correlated with experimentally observed miRNA-mediated silencing efficacy. Sci. Rep. 2012, 10.1038/srep00996.
34. Kawamata T., et al. Structural determinants of miRNAs for RISC loading and slicer-independent unwinding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:953-960.
35. Yoda M., et al. ATP-dependent human RISC assembly pathways. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 17:17-23.
36. Georg J., Hess W.R. cis-antisense RNA, another level of gene regulation in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75:286-300.
37. Bouvier M., et al. Small RNA binding to 5' mRNA coding region inhibits translational initiation. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:827-837.
38. Gottesman S. The small RNA regulators of Escherichia coli: roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 58:303-328.
39. Bandyra K.J., et al. The seed region of a small RNA drives the controlled destruction of the target mRNA by the endoribonuclease RNase E. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:943-953.
40. Shao Y., et al. Functional determinants of the quorum-sensing non-coding RNAs and their roles in target regulation. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2158-2171.
41. Frohlich K.S., et al. A small RNA activates CFA synthase by isoform-specific mRNA stabilization. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2963-2979.
42. Papenfort K., et al. Small RNA-mediated activation of sugar phosphatase mRNA regulates glucose homeostasis. Cell 2013, 153:426-437.
43. Balbontín R., et al. Recognition of heptameric seed sequence underlies multi-target regulation by RybB small RNA in Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 78:380-394.
44. Gottesman S., Storz G. Bacterial small RNA regulators: versatile roles and rapidly evolving variations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 10.1101/cshperspect.a003798.
45. Kawamoto H., et al. Base-pairing requirement for RNA silencing by a bacterial small RNA and acceleration of duplex formation by Hfq. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61:1013-1022.
46. Guillier M., Gottesman S. The 5' end of two redundant sRNAs is involved in the regulation of multiple targets, including their own regulator. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:6781-6794.
47. Papenfort K., et al. Evidence for an autonomous 5' target recognition domain in an Hfq-associated small RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20435-20440.
48. Pfeiffer V., et al. Coding sequence targeting by MicC RNA reveals bacterial mRNA silencing downstream of translational initiation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:840-846.
49. Peer A., Margalit H. Accessibility and evolutionary conservation mark bacterial small-RNA target-binding regions. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193:1690-1701.
50. Beisel C.L., et al. Multiple factors dictate target selection by Hfq-binding small RNAs. EMBO J. 2012, 31:1961-1974.
51. Bohn C., et al. Experimental discovery of small RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a riboregulator of central metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:6620-6636.
52. Geissmann T., et al. A search for small noncoding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a conserved sequence motif for regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:7239-7257.
53. Johansen J., et al. Down-regulation of outer membrane proteins by noncoding RNAs: unraveling the cAMP-CRP-and sigmaE-dependent CyaR-ompX regulatory case. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 383:1.
54. Papenfort K., et al. Systematic deletion of Salmonella small RNA genes identifies CyaR, a conserved CRP-dependent riboregulator of OmpX synthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68:890-906.
55. Vogel J., Luisi B.F. Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9:578-589.
56. Hussein R., Lim H.N. Disruption of small RNA signaling caused by competition for Hfq. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:1110-1115.
57. Moon K., Gottesman S. Competition among Hfq-binding small RNAs in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 82:1545-1562.
58. Chao Y., et al. An atlas of Hfq-bound transcripts reveals 3[prime] UTRs as a genomic reservoir of regulatory small RNAs. EMBO J. 2012, 31:4005-4019.
59. Christiansen J.K., et al. Identification of small Hfq-binding RNAs in Listeria monocytogenes. RNA 2006, 12:1383-1396.
60. Sauer E. Structure and RNA-binding properties of the bacterial LSm protein Hfq. RNA Biol. 2013, 10:610-618.
61. Fender A., et al. RNAs actively cycle on the Sm-like protein Hfq. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:2621-2626.
62. Moll I., et al. RNA chaperone activity of the Sm-like Hfq protein. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4:284-289.
63. Møller T., et al. Hfq: a bacterial Sm-like protein that mediates RNA-RNA interaction. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:23-30.
64. Hao Y., et al. Quantifying the sequence-function relation in gene silencing by bacterial small RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:12473-12478.
65. Soper T.J., et al. Major role for mRNA binding and restructuring in sRNA recruitment by Hfq. RNA 2011, 17:1544-1550.
66. Brantl S. Regulatory mechanisms employed by cis-encoded antisense RNAs. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10:102-109.
67. Han K., et al. Recognition and discrimination of target mRNAs by Sib RNAs, a cis-encoded sRNA family. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:5851-5866.
68. Gudbergsdottir S., et al. Dynamic properties of the Sulfolobus CRISPR/Cas and CRISPR/Cmr systems when challenged with vector-borne viral and plasmid genes and protospacers. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 79:35-49.
69. Millen A.M., et al. Mobile CRISPR/Cas-mediated bacteriophage resistance in Lactococcus lactis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e51663. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051663.
70. Semenova E., et al. Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10098-10103.
71. Wiedenheft B., et al. RNA-guided complex from a bacterial immune system enhances target recognition through seed sequence interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10092-10097.
72. Cady K.C., et al. The CRISPR/Cas adaptive immune system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediates resistance to naturally occurring and engineered phages. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194:5728-5738.
73. Vercoe R.B., et al. Cytotoxic chromosomal targeting by CRISPR/Cas systems can reshape bacterial genomes and expel or remodel pathogenicity islands. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003454. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003454.
74. Maier L-K., et al. Essential requirements for the detection and degradation of invaders by the Haloferax volcanii CRISPR/Cas system I-B. RNA Biol. 2013, 10:865-874.
75. Jore M.M., et al. Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:529-536.
76. Wiedenheft B., et al. Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system. Nature 2011, 477:486-489.
77. Jiang W., et al. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:233-239.
78. Garneau J.E., et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 2010, 468:67-71.
79. Jinek M., et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012, 337:816-821.
80. Gasiunas G., et al. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E2579-E2586.
81. Deveau H., et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190:1390-1400.
82. Sapranauskas R., et al. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:9275-9282.
83. Sun C.L., et al. Phage mutations in response to CRISPR diversification in a bacterial population. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15:463-470.
84. Cong L., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339:819-823.
85. Mali P., et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013, 339:823-826.
86. Ran F.A., et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8:2281-2308.
87. Sashital D.G., et al. Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:606-615.
88. Westra E.R., et al. Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems discriminate target from non-target DNA through base pairing-independent PAM recognition. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003742. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003742.
89. Sinkunas T., et al. In vitro reconstitution of Cascade-mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus. EMBO J. 2013, 32:385-394.
90. Lambowitz A.M., Zimmerly S. Group II introns: mobile ribozymes that invade DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3:a003616.
91. Cisse I.I., et al. A rule of seven in Watson-Crick base-pairing of mismatched sequences. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:623-627.
92. Gorman J., Greene E.C. Visualizing one-dimensional diffusion of proteins along DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:768-774.
93. Datsenko K.A., et al. Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:945.
94. Beisel C.L., Storz G. Base pairing small RNAs and their roles in global regulatory networks. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34:866-882.
95. Papenfort K., Vogel J. Multiple target regulation by small noncoding RNAs rewires gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160:278-287.
96. Papenfort K., et al. The ancestral SgrS RNA discriminates horizontally acquired Salmonella mRNAs through a single GU wobble pair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E757-E764.
97. Carroll S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008, 134:25-36.
98. De Robertis E. Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell 2008, 132:185-195.
99. Shubin N., et al. Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 2009, 457:818-823.
100. Westra E.R., et al. CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:595-605.
101. Deltcheva E., et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 2011, 471:602-607.
102. Marraffini L.A., Sontheimer E.J. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science 2008, 322:1843-1845.
103. Hale C.R., et al. RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex. Cell 2009, 139:945-956.
104. Barrangou R., et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007, 315:1709-1712.
105. Yosef I., et al. Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:5569-5576.
106. Brouns S.J.J., et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 2008, 321:960-964.
107. Haurwitz R.E., et al. Sequence-and structure-specific RNA processing by a CRISPR endonuclease. Science 2010, 329:1355-1358.
108. Sashital D.G., et al. An RNA-induced conformational change required for CRISPR RNA cleavage by the endoribonuclease Cse3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:680-687.