High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 631-640

  Chiang, Yun Hwa ^a   Shih, Hsi An ^b   Hsu, Chu Chun ^c  

^a MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c SOUTHERN TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

High commitment work system; New product development; New product performance; Transactive memory system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893680965     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Akgun A.E., Byrne J.C., Keskin H., Lynn G.S. Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2006, 53(1):95-111.
2. Akgun A.E., Byrne J., Keskin H., Lynn G.S., Imamoglu S.Z. Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information Management 2005, 42:1105-1120.
3. Arthur J.B. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 1992, 45:488-506.
4. Aryee S., Walumbwa F.O., Seidu E.Y.M., Otaye L.E. Impact of high performance work system on individual and branch level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology 2012, 97(2):287-300.
5. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1988, 16(1):74-94.
6. Bliese P.D. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods 1998, 1:355-373.
7. Bowen D.E., Ostroff C. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkage: The role of the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review 2004, 29:203-221.
8. Brockman B.K., Morgan R.M. The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development. Academy of Marketing Science Journal 2006, 34(3):295-307.
9. Chadwick C. Theoretic insights on the nature of synergies in human resource systems: Toward greater precision. Human Resource Management Review 2010, 20(2):85-101.
10. Chiang Y.H., Hung K.P. Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management 2010, 40(3):292-299.
11. Chin W. The partial lease square approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. G.A. Mrcoulides (Ed.).
12. Chu P.Y., Hsiao N., Lee F.W., Chen C.W. Exploring success factors for Taiwan's government electronic tendering system: Behavioral perspectives from end users. Government Information Quarterly 2004, 21(2):219-234.
13. Chuang C., Liao H. Strategic human resource management in service context: Taking care of business by taking care of employees and customers. Personnel Psychology 2010, 63:153-196.
14. Collins C.J., Smith K.G. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49(3):544-560.
15. Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23(12):1095-1121.
16. Day G. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58:37-52.
17. Dayan M., Elbanna S. Antecedents of team intuition and its impact on the success of new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2011, 28(7):159-174.
18. Delaney J.T., Huselid M.A. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of performance in for-profit and nonprofit organizations. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39(1):949-969.
19. Delery J.E., Doty D.H. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic contingency and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39(4):802-835.
20. Dragoni L. Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90(6):1084-1095.
21. Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science 2000, 46(12):1554-1568.
22. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(2):39-50.
23. Gupta S., Woodside A. Advancing theory of new B-to-B relationships: Examining network participants' interpretations of e-intermediary innovation, diffusion, and adoption processes. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 2006, 13(4):1-27.
24. Gupta S., Woodside A., Dubelaar C. Diffusing knowledge-based core competencies for leveraging innovation strategies: Modeling outsourcing to knowledge process organizations (KPOs) in pharmaceutical networks. Industrial Marketing Management 2009, 38(2):219-227.
25. Guthrie J.P. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:180-190.
26. Hargadon A.B., Bechky B.A. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science 2006, 17:484-500.
27. Hasan B., Ali J. An empirical examination of factors affecting group effectiveness in information systems projects. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 2007, 5(2):229-243.
28. He J., Butler B.S., King W.R. Team cognition: Development and evolution in software project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 2007, 24(2):261-292.
29. Hollingshead A.B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1998, 34:423-442.
30. Huang C.C. Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation 2009, 29:786-797.
31. Huselid M.A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial management. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38(3):635-672.
32. Jansen J.J.P., Vera D., Crossan M. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly 2009, 20(1):5-18.
33. Janz B.D., Prasarnphanich P. Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences Journal 2003, 34(2):31-384.
34. Jarvenpaa S.L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science 2008, 19(2):260-276.
35. Kohli A.K., Jaworski B.J. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing 1990, 54(4):1-18.
36. Lepak D.P., Liao H., Chung Y.H., Harden E.E. A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 2006, 25:217-271.
37. Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88(4):587-604.
38. Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007, 103(2):159-178.
39. Lewis K., Herndon B. Transactive memory system: Current issues and future research direction. Organization Science 2011, 22(5):1254-1265.
40. Liang D.W., Moreland R.L., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21:384-393.
41. Liao H., Toya K., Lepak D., Hong Y. Do they see eye to eyeα Management and employee perspectives of high performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:371-391.
42. MacDuffie J.P. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations 1995, 1995(48):197-221.
43. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):709-734.
44. Messersmith J.G., Lepak D.P., Partel P.C. Unlocking the black box: Exploring the link between high performance work system and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011, 96(6):1105-1118.
45. Milkovich G.T. Compensation systems in high technology companies. New perspectives on compensation 1987, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. D.B. Balkin, L.R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.).
46. Montoya Weiss M.M., Calantone R. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1994, 11(5):397-417.
47. Moorman C. Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research 1995, 32(3):318-335.
48. Moorman C., Minor A.S. The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research 1997, 34(2):91-106.
49. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
50. Peltokorpi V. Transactive memory directories in small work units. Personnel Review 2004, 33(4):446-467.
51. Peltokorpi V. Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology 2008, 12(4):378-394.
52. Peltokorpi V. Organizational transactive memory: Review and extension. European Psychologist 2012, 17(1):11-20.
53. Peltokorpi V., Manka M.L. Antecedents and the performance outcome of transactive memory in daycare work groups. European Psychologist 2008, 13(2):103-113.
54. Ployhart R.E., Moliterno T.P. Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review 2011, 36(1):127-150.
55. Rau D. The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory-Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research 2005, 36(6):746-771.
56. Rau D. Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy. Journal of Business Research 2006, 59:416-424.
57. Ren Y., Argote L. Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The Academy of Management Annals 2011, 5(1):189-229.
58. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will S. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg Retrieved from. http://www.smartpls.de.
59. Saadè R.G. Dimensions of perceived usefulness: Toward enhanced assessment. Decision Science Journal of Innovation Education 2007, 5(2):289-310.
60. Schneider B., Reichers A.E. On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology 1983, 36(1):19-39.
61. Sethi R., Iqbal Z. Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. Journal of Marketing 2008, 72(1):118-134.
62. Simonton D.K. Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review 2000, 20(2):283-318.
63. Sinkula J.M. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58(1):35-45.
64. Takeuchi R., Chen G., Lepak D.P. Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees' attitudes. Personnel Psychology 2009, 62(1):1-29.
65. Takeuchi R., Lepak D.P., Wang H.L., Takeuchi K. An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92(4):1069-1083.
66. Tseng C.Y., Wu L.Y. Innovation quality in the automobile industry: Measurement indicators and performance implications. International Journal of Technology Management 2007, 37(1/2):162-177.
67. Wegner D.M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of group behavior 1986, 185-208. Springer-Verlag, New York. B. Mullen, G.R. Goethals (Eds.).
68. Wegner D.M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 61(6):923-929.
69. Wegner D.M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Compatible and incompatible relationships 1985, 253-276. Springer, New York. W.J. Ickes (Ed.).
70. Whitener E.M., Brodt S.E., Korsgaard M.A., Werner J.M. Mangers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):513-530.
71. Wu L.Y. Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60(5):549-555.
72. Wu L.Y. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research Volume 2010, 63(1):27-31.
73. Wu L.Y., Wang C.J. Innovation transforming resources to improve performance of technology-based firms: A Taiwanese empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2007, 24(3):251-261.
74. Zhang Z.X., Hempel P.S., Han Y.L., Tjosvold D. Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92(6):1722-1730.