High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 180-190

  Guthrie, James P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035529301     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3069345     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Agarwal, N. C. 1979. On the interchangeability of size measures. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 404-409.
2. Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396-402.
3. Arthur, J. 1992. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45: 488-506.
4. Arthur, J. 1994. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 670-687.
5. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
6. Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 779-801.
7. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. 1998. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, vol. 16: 53-101. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Boxall, P. 1993. Management strategy and the Employment Contracts Act of 1991. In R. Harbridge (Ed.), Employment contracts: New Zealand experiences: 148-164. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
9. Bray, M., & Walsh, P. 1998. Different paths to neo-liberalism? Comparing Australia and New Zealand. Industrial Relations, 37: 358-387.
10. Cascio, W. F. 1998. Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Cooke, W. N. 1994. Employee participation programs, group-based incentives and company performance: A union-nonunion comparison. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47: 594-609.
12. Crocombe, G. T., Enright, M. J., & Porter, M. E. 1991. Upgrading New Zealand's competitive advantage. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
13. Dannin, E. 1996. The price of everything - The value of nothing. Electronic Journal of Radical Organisational Theory, 2: 1-2. http://www.mngt.waikato-.ac.nz//ejrot.
14. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. 1996. Theoretical frameworks in strategic human resource management: Universalistic, contingency and configurational perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 802-835.
15. Erickson, C. L., & Kuruvilla, S. 1998. Industrial relations system transformation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52: 3.
16. Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. 1984. What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.
17. Gerhart, B. 1999. Human resource management and firm performance: Measurement issues and their effect on causal and policy inferences. In P. M. Wright, L. D. Dyer, J. W. Boudreau, & G. T. Milkovich (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, supplement 4: 31-51. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18. Hom, P., & Griffeth, R. W. 1995. Employee turnover. Cincinnati: South/Western.
19. Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.
20. Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. 1996. Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link. Industrial Relations, 35: 400-422.
21. Huselid, M., & Rau, B. 1997. The determinants of high performance work systems. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.
22. Itami, H. 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets. Boston: Harvard University Press.
23. Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.). Annual review of psychology, vol. 46: 237-264. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
24. Kelsey, J. 1995. The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment? Auckland, New Zealand: Pluto Press.
25. Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. 1996. Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 335-354.
26. Kochan, T., & Osterman, P. 1994. The mutual gains enterprise. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Lawler, E. 1992. The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Levine, D. 1995. .Reinventing the workplace: How business and employers can both win. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
29. Lincoln, J. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. 1996. Commitment, quits and work organization in Japanese and U.S. plants. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50: 39-59.
30. MacDuffie, J. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197-221.
31. Maddala, G. S. 1977. Econometrics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
32. Pfeffer, J. 1998. The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
33. Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12: 531-544.
34. Salop, S. C. 1979. A model of the natural rate of unemployment. American Economic Review, 69: 117-125.
35. Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. 1989. Economics (13th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Shaw, J. D., Delery, J. E., Jenkins, G. D. & Gupta, N. 1998. An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 511-525.
37. Staw, B. M. 1980. The consequences of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1: 253-273.
38. Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W. & Lepak, D. P. 1996. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 836-865.