Construction of novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for bioethanol Active Dry Yeast (ADY) production

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Zheng, Daoqiong ^a   Zhang, Ke ^a   Gao, Kehui ^a   Liu, Zewei ^a   Zhang, Xing ^a   Li, Ou ^a   Sun, Jianguo ^a   Zhang, Xiaoyang ^b   Du, Fengguang ^b   Sun, Peiyong ^b   Qu, Aimin ^b   Wu, Xuechang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b State Key Laboratory of Motor Vehicle Biofuel Technology (Tianguan Group Co Ltd)   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; TREHALOSE;

ACTIVE DRY YEAST; ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGAL VIABILITY; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS;

BIOFUELS; DEHYDRATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84893451501     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K (2012) Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview. Renew Energy 37: 19-27. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045.
2. Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I (2010) Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101: 4744-4753. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.080. PubMed: 20031394.
3. Kasavi C, Finore I, Lama L, Nicolaus B, Oliver SG et al. (2012) Evaluation of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 45: 230-238. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06. 013.
4. Amorim HV, Lopes ML, de Castro Oliveira JV, Buckeridge MS, Goldman GH (2011) Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91: 1267-1275. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3437-6. PubMed: 21735264.
5. Della-Bianca BE, Basso TO, Stambuk BU, Basso LC, Gombert AK (2013) What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 979-991. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4631-x. PubMed: 23271669.
6. Bellissimi E, Ingledew W (2005) Metabolic acclimatization: preparing active dry yeast for fuel ethanol production. Process Biochemistry 40: 2205-2213. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2004.09.002. (Pubitemid 40257049)
7. Kollaras A, Kavanagh JM, Bell GL, Purkovic D, Mandarakas S et al. (2011) Techno-economic implications of improved high gravity corn mash fermentation. Bioresour Technol 102: 7521-7525. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.094. PubMed: 21632242.
8. Shi DJ, Wang CL, Wang KM (2009) Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36: 139-147. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008- 0481-z. PubMed: 18846398.
9. Vaudano E, Costantini A, Cersosimo M, Del Prete V, Garcia-Moruno E (2009) Application of real-time RT-PCR to study gene expression in active dry yeast (ADY) during the rehydration phase. Int J Food Microbiol 129: 30-36. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.10.027. PubMed: 19062120.
10. Garre E, Raginel F, Palacios A, Julien A, Matallana E (2010) Oxidative stress responses and lipid peroxidation damage are induced during dehydration in the production of dry active wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 136: 295-303. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.018. PubMed: 19914726.
11. Pérez-Torrado R, Gómez-Pastor R, Larsson C, Matallana E (2009) Fermentative capacity of dry active wine yeast requires a specific oxidative stress response during industrial biomass growth. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81: 951-960. doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1722-9. PubMed: 18836715.
12. Trofimova Y, Walker G, Rapoport A (2010) Anhydrobiosis in yeast: influence of calcium and magnesium ions on yeast resistance to dehydration-rehydration. FEMS Microbiol Lett 308: 55-61. doi:10.1111/j.1574- 6968.2010.01989.x. PubMed: 20487021.
13. Koerkamp MG, Rep M, Bussemaker HJ, Hardy GP, Mul A et al. (2002) Dissection of transient oxidative stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using DNA microarrays. Mol Biol Cell 13: 2783-2794. doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-02- 0075. PubMed: 12181346.
14. Jiménez-Martí E, Zuzuarregui A, Gomar-Alba M, Gutiérrez D, Gil C et al. (2011) Molecular response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine and laboratory strains to high sugar stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 145: 211-220. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.023. PubMed: 21247650.
15. Lewis JA, Elkon IM, McGee MA, Higbee AJ, Gasch AP (2010) Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance. Genetics 186: 1197-1205. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.121871. PubMed: 20855568.
16. Mahmud SA, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Yoshikawa K, Shimizu H (2012) Understanding the mechanism of heat stress tolerance caused by high trehalose accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray. J Biosci Bioeng 113: 526-528. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.11.028. PubMed: 22222142.
17. Gong JX, Zheng HJ, Wu ZJ, Chen T, Zhao XM (2009) Genome shuffling: progress and applications for phenotype improvement. Biotechnol Adv 27: 996-1005. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.016. PubMed: 19463940.
18. Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WP et al. (2002) Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature 415: 644-646. doi:10.1038/415644a. PubMed: 11832946. (Pubitemid 34136391)
19. Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V, Perry K, Stemmer WP et al. (2002) Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat Biotechnol 20: 707-712. doi:10.1038/nbt0702-707. PubMed: 12089556. (Pubitemid 34741984)
20. Pinel D, D'Aoust F, del Cardayre SB, Bajwa PK, Lee H et al. (2011) Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome shuffling through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 4736-4743. doi:10.1128/AEM.02769-10. PubMed: 21622800.
21. Tao X, Zheng D, Liu T, Wang P, Zhao W et al. (2012) A novel strategy to construct yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity fermentation. PLOS ONE 7: e31235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031235. PubMed: 22363590.
22. Wang PM, Zheng DQ, Liu TZ, Tao XL, Feng MG et al. (2012) The combination of glycerol metabolic engineering and drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve very-high-gravity fermentation performances of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol 108: 203-210. doi:10.1016/j. biortech.2011.12.147. PubMed: 22269055.
23. Wood JS (1982) Mitotic chromosome loss induced by methyl benzimidazole-2-yl-carbamate as a rapid mapping method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2: 1080-1087. PubMed: 6757721.
24. Liu J, Zhu Y, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J (2013) Exogenous ergosterol protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from d-limonene stress. J Appl Microbiol 114: 482-491. PubMed: 23082823.
25. Zheng DQ, Wu XC, Tao XL, Wang PM, Li P et al. (2011) Screening and construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved multi-tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance. Bioresour Technol 102: 3020-3027. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.122. PubMed: 20980141.
26. Zheng DQ, Wang PM, Chen J, Zhang K, Liu TZ et al. (2012) Genome sequencing and genetic breeding of a bioethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJS329. BMC Genomics 13: 479. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-479. PubMed: 22978491.
27. Vandesompele J, Preter KD, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Roy NV et al. (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3: RESEARCH0034. PubMed: 12184808.
28. Beney L, Gervais P (2001) Influence of the fluidity of the membrane on the response of microorganisms to environmental stresses. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57: 34-42. doi:10.1007/s002530100754. PubMed: 11693931. (Pubitemid 32938349)
29. Lemetais G, Dupont S, Beney L, Gervais P (2012) Air-drying kinetics affect yeast membrane organization and survival. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96: 471-480. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4014-3. PubMed: 22552899.
30. Dupont S, Beney L, Ferreira T, Gervais P (2011) Nature of sterols affects plasma membrane behavior and yeast survival during dehydration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808: 1520-1528. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.012. PubMed: 21081111.
31. Mentré P, Hoa GHB (2001) Effects of high hydrostatic pressures on living cells: a consequence of the properties of macromolecules and macromolecule-associated water. Int Rev Cytol 201: 1-84. doi:10.1016/S0074- 7696(01)01001-4. PubMed: 11057830. (Pubitemid 33717271)
32. Abe F, Hiraki T (2009) Mechanistic role of ergosterol in membrane rigidity and cycloheximide resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788: 743-752. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.12.002. PubMed: 19118519.
33. Gadd GM, Chalmers K, Reed RH (1987) The role of trehalose in dehydration resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 48: 249-254. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02551.x.
34. Pagnotta SE, McLain SE, Soper AK, Bruni F, Ricci MA (2010) Water and trehalose: how much do they interact with each other? J Phys Chem B 114: 4904-4908. doi:10.1021/jp911940h. PubMed: 20297794.
35. Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Matallana E (2012) Modification of the TRX2 gene dose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects hexokinase 2 gene regulation during wine yeast biomass production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94: 773-787. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3738-9. PubMed: 22223102.
36. Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Cabiscol E, Ros J, Matallana E (2010) Reduction of oxidative cellular damage by overexpression of the thioredoxin TRX2 gene improves yield and quality of wine yeast dry active biomass. Microb Cell Fact 9: 9. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-9. PubMed: 20152017.
37. Litwin I, Bocer T, Dziadkowiec D, Wysocki R (2013) Oxidative stress and replication-independent DNA breakage induced by arsenic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 9: e1003640. PubMed: 23935510.
38. Allen SA, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A et al. (2010) Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 1-10. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3- 1. PubMed: 20047650.
39. Morano KA, Grant CM, Moye-Rowley WS (2012) The response to heat shock and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190: 1157-1195. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128033. PubMed: 22209905.
40. Espindola AS, Gomes DS, Panek AD, Eleutherio ECA (2003) The role of glutathione in yeast dehydration tolerance. Cryobiology 47: 236-241. doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2003.10.003. PubMed: 14697735. (Pubitemid 38091461)
41. Crowe JH, Carpenter JF, Crowe LM (1998) The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annu Rev Physiol 60: 73-103. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.73. PubMed: 9558455. (Pubitemid 28157865)