Correction: The PCNA interaction protein box sequence in Rad54 is an integral part of its ATPase domain and is required for efficient DNA repair and recombination (PLoS ONE (2013) 8, 12 (e82630) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082630);The PCNA interaction protein box sequence in Rad54 is an integral part of its ATPase domain and is required for efficient DNA repair and recombination

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Burgess, Rebecca C ^a,f   Sebesta, Marek ^b,c   Sisakova, Alexandra ^b,c   Marini, Victoria P ^b   Lisby, Michael ^d   Damborsky, Jiri ^b,c   Klein, Hannah ^e   Rothstein, Rodney ^a   Krejci, Lumir ^b,c  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c ST ANNE S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; MUTANT PROTEIN; RAD54 PROTEIN; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; DNA; DNA HELICASE; POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE; PRIMER DNA; PROTEIN BINDING; RAD54 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HELICASES; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTANT PROTEINS; MUTATION; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84893373017     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101095     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of Homologous Recombination. Annual Review of Biochemistry 77: 229-257.
2. Moynahan ME, Jasin M (2010) Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 11: 196-207.
3. Krejci L, Altmannova V, Spirek M, Zhao X (2012) Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 5795-5818.
4. Krogh BO, Symington LS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233-271. (Pubitemid 40013729)
5. Ceballos SJ, Heyer WD (2011) Functions of the Snf2/Swi2 family Rad54 motor protein in homologous recombination. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1809: 509-523.
6. Mazin AV, Mazina OM, Bugreev DV, Rossi MJ (2010) Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 286-302.
7. Sung P, Krejci L, Van Komen S, Sehorn MG (2003) Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators. J Biol Chem 278: 42729-42732. (Pubitemid 37345880)
8. Agarwal S, van Cappellen WA, Guenole A, Eppink B, Linsen SE, et al. (2011) ATP-dependent and independent functions of Rad54 in genome maintenance. J Cell Biol 192: 735-750.
9. Wolner B, Peterson CL (2005) ATP-dependent and ATP-independent roles for the Rad54 chromatin remodeling enzyme during recombinational repair of a DNA double strand break. J Biol Chem 280: 10855-10860. (Pubitemid 40395950)
10. Mazin AV, Alexeev AA, Kowalczykowski SC (2003) A novel function of Rad54 protein. Stabilization of the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. J Biol Chem 278: 14029-14036. (Pubitemid 36799947)
11. Clever B, Interthal H, Schmuckli-Maurer J, King J, Sigrist M, et al. (1997) Recombinational repair in yeast: functional interactions between Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. EMBO J 16: 2535-2544. (Pubitemid 27258649)
12. Jiang H, Xie Y, Houston P, Stemke-Hale K, Mortensen UH, et al. (1996) Direct association between the yeast Rad51 and Rad54 recombination proteins. J Biol Chem 271: 33181-33186. (Pubitemid 27010123)
13. Raschle M, Van Komen S, Chi P, Ellenberger T, Sung P (2004) Multiple interactions with the Rad51 recombinase govern the homologous recombination function of Rad54. J Biol Chem 279: 51973-51980. (Pubitemid 39656567)
14. Alexeev A, Mazin A, Kowalczykowski SC (2003) Rad54 protein possesses chromatin-remodeling activity stimulated by the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. Nat Struct Biol 10: 182-186. (Pubitemid 36297987)
15. Jaskelioff M, Van Komen S, Krebs JE, Sung P, Peterson CL (2003) Rad54p is a chromatin remodeling enzyme required for heteroduplex DNA joint formation with chromatin. J Biol Chem 278: 9212-9218. (Pubitemid 36800403)
16. Petukhova G, Stratton S, Sung P (1998) Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature 393: 91-94. (Pubitemid 28240262)
17. Petukhova G, Stratton SA, Sung P (1999) Single strand DNA binding and annealing activities in the yeast recombination factor Rad59. J Biol Chem 274: 33839-33842. (Pubitemid 129511705)
18. Ristic D, Wyman C, Paulusma C, Kanaar R (2001) The architecture of the human Rad54-DNA complex provides evidence for protein translocation along DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8454-8460. (Pubitemid 32678049)
19. Van Komen S, Petukhova G, Sigurdsson S, Stratton S, Sung P (2000) Superhelicity-driven homologous DNA pairing by yeast recombination factors Rad51 and Rad54. Mol Cell 6: 563-572.
20. Li X, Heyer WD (2009) RAD54 controls access to the invading 3′-OH end after RAD51-mediated DNA strand invasion in homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 638-646.
21. Amitani I, Baskin RJ, Kowalczykowski SC (2006) Visualization of Rad54, a chromatin remodeling protein, translocating on single DNA molecules. Mol Cell 23: 143-148. (Pubitemid 43963440)
22. Solinger JA, Heyer WD (2001) Rad54 protein stimulates the postsynaptic phase of Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8447-8453. (Pubitemid 32678048)
23. Solinger JA, Kiianitsa K, Heyer WD (2002) Rad54, a Swi2/Snf2-like recombinational repair protein, disassembles Rad51:dsDNA filaments. Mol Cell 10: 1175-1188. (Pubitemid 35453834)
24. Bugreev DV, Mazina OM, Mazin AV (2006) Rad54 protein promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nature 442: 590-593. (Pubitemid 44167920)
25. Maloisel L, Bhargava J, Roeder GS (2004) A role for DNA polymerase delta in gene conversion and crossing over during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167: 1133-1142. (Pubitemid 39045623)
26. Maloisel L, Fabre F, Gangloff S (2008) DNA polymerase delta is preferentially recruited during homologous recombination to promote heteroduplex DNA extension. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1373-1382. (Pubitemid 351214138)
27. Sebesta M, Burkovics P, Haracska L, Krejci L (2011) Reconstitution of DNA repair synthesis in vitro and the role of polymerase and helicase activities. DNA Repair (Amst) 10: 567-576.
28. Li X, Stith CM, Burgers PM, Heyer W-D (2009) PCNA Is Required for Initiation of Recombination- Associated DNA Synthesis by DNA Polymerase &delta. Molecular Cell 36: 704-713.
29. Matulova P, Marini V, Burgess RC, Sisakova A, Kwon Y, et al. (2009) Cooperativity of Mus81-Mms4 with Rad54 in the resolution of recombination and replication intermediates. J Biol Chem. 284: 7733-7745.
30. Mazina OM, Mazin AV (2008) Human Rad54 protein stimulates human Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18249-18254.
31. Klein HL (2001) Mutations in recombinational repair and in checkpoint control genes suppress the lethal combination of srs2D with other DNA repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 557-565.
32. Palladino F, Klein HL (1992) Analysis of mitotic and meiotic defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRS2 DNA helicase mutants. Genetics 132: 23-37.
33. Sugawara N, Wang X, Haber JE (2003) In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 12: 209-219. (Pubitemid 36945046)
34. Warbrick E (2000) The puzzle of PCNA's many partners. Bioessays 22: 997-1006.
35. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S (2007) PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 129: 665-679. (Pubitemid 46802385)
36. Gilljam KM, Feyzi E, Aas PA, Sousa MM, Muller R, et al. (2009) Identification of a novel, widespread, and functionally important PCNA-binding motif. J Cell Biol 186: 645-654.
37. Bruning JB, Shamoo Y (2004) Structural and thermodynamic analysis of human PCNA with peptides derived from DNA polymerase-delta p66 subunit and flap endonuclease-1. Structure 12: 2209-2219. (Pubitemid 39593198)
38. Gulbis JM, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J (1996) Structure of the C-terminal region of p21(WAF1/CIP1) complexed with human PCNA. Cell 87: 297-306. (Pubitemid 26359007)
39. Freudenthal BD, Gakhar L, Ramaswamy S, Washington MT (2010) Structure of monoubiquitinated PCNA and implications for translesion synthesis and DNA polymerase exchange. Nature structural & molecular biology 17: 479-484.
40. Ayyagari R, Impellizzeri KJ, Yoder BL, Gary SL, Burgers PM (1995) A mutational analysis of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen indicates distinct roles in DNA replication and DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 15: 4420-4429.
41. Eissenberg JC, Ayyagari R, Gomes XV, Burgers PM (1997) Mutations in yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen define distinct sites for interaction with DNA polymerase delta and DNA polymerase epsilon. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6367-6378. (Pubitemid 27451181)
42. Balajee AS, Geard CR (2001) Chromatin-bound PCNA complex formation triggered by DNA damage occurs independent of the ATM gene product in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 1341-1351. (Pubitemid 32229462)
43. Moggs JG, Grandi P, Quivy JP, Jonsson ZO, Hubscher U, et al. (2000) A CAF-1-PCNA-mediated chromatin assembly pathway triggered by sensing DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 20: 1206-1218. (Pubitemid 30069241)
44. Gomes XV, Burgers PM (2000) Two modes of FEN1 binding to PCNA regulated by DNA. Embo J 19: 3811-3821. (Pubitemid 30462138)
45. Armstrong AA, Mohideen F, Lima CD (2012) Recognition of SUMO-modified PCNA requires tandem receptor motifs in Srs2. Nature 482: 59-63.
46. Kolesar P, Sarangi P, Altmannova V, Zhao X, Krejci L (2012) Dual roles of the SUMO-interacting motif in the regulation of Srs2 sumoylation. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 7831-7843.
47. Johansson E, Garg P, Burgers PM (2004) The Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase delta contains separable domains for processive replication and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding. J Biol Chem 279: 1907-1915. (Pubitemid 38084461)
48. Game JC, Mortimer RK (1974) A genetic study of x-ray sensitive mutants in yeast. Mutat Res 24: 281-292.
49. Arbel A, Zenvirth D, Simchen G (1999) Sister chromatid-based DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1 . EMBO J 18: 2648-2658. (Pubitemid 29213294)
50. Shinohara M, Shita-Yamaguchi E, Buerstedde JM, Shinagawa H, Ogawa H, et al. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147: 1545-1556.
51. Aguilera A, Klein HL (1988) Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations. Genetics 119: 779-790.
52. Fabre F, Chan A, Heyer WD, Gangloff S (2002) Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16887-16892. (Pubitemid 36034068)
53. Petukhova G, Van Komen S, Vergano S, Klein H, Sung P (1999) Yeast Rad54 promotes Rad51-dependent homologous DNA pairing via ATP hydrolysisdriven change in DNA double helix conformation. J Biol Chem 274: 29453-29462.
54. Burkovics P, Sebesta M, Sisakova A, Plault N, Szukacsov V, et al. (2013) Srs2 mediates PCNA-SUMO-dependent inhibition of DNA repair synthesis. Embo J 32: 742-755.
55. Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S (2005) SUMOmodified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428-433. (Pubitemid 41059056)
56. Ulrich HD (2007) PCNA-SUMO and Srs2: a model SUMO substrate-effector pair. Biochemical Society transactions 35: 1385-1388.
57. Sherman F (1991) Getting started with yeast. Methods in Enzymology 194: 3-21.
58. Thomas BJ, Rothstein R (1989) Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56: 619-630.
59. Zhao X, Muller EGD, Rothstein R (1998) A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools. Mol. Cell 2: 329-340. (Pubitemid 128379273)
60. Erdeniz N, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R (1997) Cloning-free PCR-based allele replacement methods. Genome Res 7: 1174-1183. (Pubitemid 28043847)
61. Smirnova M, Van Komen S, Sung P, Klein HL (2004) Effects of tumor-associated mutations on Rad54 functions. J Biol Chem 279: 24081-24088. (Pubitemid 38725267)
62. Bernstein KA, Shor E, Sunjevaric I, Fumasoni M, Burgess RC, et al. (2009) Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair. EMBO J. 28: 915-925.
63. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X (2007) The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Molecular and Cellular Biology 27: 6153-6162. (Pubitemid 47326702)
64. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, et al. (2003) DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423: 305-309. (Pubitemid 40852702)
65. Sugawara N, Haber JE (2006) Repair of DNA double strand breaks: in vivo biochemistry. Methods in Enzymology 408: 416-429.