In pursuit of progress: Promotion motivation and risk preference in the domain of gains

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 183-201

  Zou, Xi ^a   Scholer, Abigail A ^b   Higgins, E Tory ^c  

^a LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Prospect theory; Regulatory focus; Risky decision making; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INVESTMENT; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INVESTMENTS; LONDON; MALE; MOTIVATION; RISK-TAKING; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893033755     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035391     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Agresti, A. (2012). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., & Isen, A. M. (1988). The role of potential loss in the influence of affect on risk-taking behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 181-193. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90011-8
4. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372. doi:10.1037/h0043445
5. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
6. Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448. doi:10.1177/ 0146167202250911
7. Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981. doi:10.1287/opre.30.5.961
8. Bell, D. E. (1983). Risk premiums for decision regret. Management Science, 29, 1156-1166. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.10.1156
9. Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
10. Bowlby, J. (1999). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Originally published 1969)
11. Brendl, C. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 95-160. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60237-3
12. Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 241-261. doi:10.1080/02699930302294
13. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
14. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139174794
15. Chang, C. H., Johnson, R. E., & Lord, R. G. (2009). Moving beyond discrepancies: The importance of velocity as a predictor of satisfaction and motivation. Human Performance, 23, 58 -80. doi:10.1080/ 08959280903400226
16. Cohen, M., Jaffray, J. Y., & Said, T. (1985). Individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 18, 203-228. doi:10.1007/BF00134074
17. Cohen, M., Jaffray, J. Y., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 1-22. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(87)90043-4
18. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132. doi:10.1006/ obhd.1996.2675
19. Fishbach, A., Dhar, R., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 232-242. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.232
20. Fishbach, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Together or apart: When goals and temptations complement versus compete. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 547-559. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.547
21. Fishburn, P. C., & Kochenberger, G. A. (1979). Concepts, theory, and techniques: Two piece von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sciences, 10, 503-518. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979 .tb00043.x
22. Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115-1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115
23. Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220-239. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009
24. Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis?. A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
25. Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00401
26. Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., Salovey, P., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). When to begin? Regulatory focus and initiating goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 121-130. doi:10.1177/ 0146167202281011
27. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
28. Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Mersmann, P. (2007). When gains loom larger than losses: Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02031.x
29. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
30. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
32. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
33. Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention experiences: Relating emotions to non-emotional motivational states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 186-211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct selfregulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
35. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
36. Higgins, E. T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 527-535. doi:10.1177/0146167292185002
37. Hsee, C. K., & Abelson, R. P. (1991). Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 341-347. doi:10.1037/0022-3514 .60.3.341
38. Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252-274. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1402
39. Isen, A. M., & Simmonds, S. F. (1978). Effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology, 41, 346-349. doi:10.2307/3033588
40. Josephs, R. A., Larrick, R. P., Steele, C. M., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 26-37. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.62.1.26
41. Kacelnik, A., & Bateson, M. (1997). Risk-sensitivity: Crossroads for theories of decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 304-309. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01093-0
42. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185
43. Kammrath, L. K., & Scholer, A. A. (2013). The cognitive-affective processing system: How if . . . then . . . profiles of behavior variation reveal the underlying functions of a person's characteristic actions. In I. B. Wiener (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology (pp. 161-182). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
44. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865-878. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
45. Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2008). Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 183-195. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.183
46. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2781
47. Kühberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Perner, J. (1999). The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 204-231. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2830
48. Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 440-450. doi:10.1037/ 0033-2909.113.3.440
49. Lawrence, J. W., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Velocity toward goal attainment in immediate experience as a determinant of affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 788-802. doi:10.1111/j .1559-1816.2002.tb00242.x
50. Lewinsohn, S., & Mano, H. (1993). Multiattribute choice and affect: The influence of naturally occurring and manipulated moods on choice processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 33-51. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960060103
51. Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.5
52. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1, 240-246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x
53. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805-824. doi:10.2307/2232669
54. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1987). Testing for regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 97, 118-129. doi:10.2307/ 3038234
55. Lopes, L. L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255-295. doi:10.1016/ S0065-2601(08)60416-5
56. Mano, H. (1992). Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 216 -245. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90036-7
57. Mano, H. (1994). Risk-taking, framing effects, and affect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 38-58. doi:10.1006/obhd .1994.1003
58. March, J. G. (1988). Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9, 5-24. doi:10.1016/ 0167-2681(88)90004-2
59. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk-taking. Management Science, 33, 1404-1418. doi:10.1287/mnsc.33 .11.1404
60. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1037/11144-000
61. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. A. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston. doi:10.1037/10039-000
62. Mishra, S., & Fiddick, L. (2012). Beyond gains and losses: The effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1136-1147. doi:10.1037/a0027855
63. Mishra, S., Lalumiere, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 616-621. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.032
64. Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 295-317): New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/ 00273170701341316
66. Rode, C., Cosmides, L., Hell, W., & Tooby, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72, 269-304. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00041-4
67. Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1040
68. Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535-548. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.535
69. Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An analysis using regulatory focus theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 489-503). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
70. Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Dodging monsters and dancing with dreams: Success and failure at different levels of approach and avoidance. Emotion Review, 5, 254 -258. doi:10.1177/ 1754073913477506
71. Scholer, A. A., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Responding to negativity: How a risky tactic can serve a vigilant strategy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 767-774. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007 .06.006
72. Scholer, A. A., Zou, X., Fujita, K., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 215-231. doi:10.1037/a0019715
73. Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy × value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.447
74. Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
75. Stephens, D. W. (1981). The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Animal Behaviour, 29, 628-629. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80128-5
76. Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1988.1010086.x
77. Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). The self-construct in social cognition: Past, present, and future. In Z. V. Segal & S. J. Blatt (Eds.), The self in emotional distress: Cognitive and psychodynamic perspectives (pp. 3-40). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
78. Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643-660. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
79. Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28-38. doi:10.1509/ jmkr.43.1.28
80. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
81. Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A. R. (2004). Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430-445. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111 .2.430
82. Winterheld, H. A., & Simpson, J. A. (2011). Seeking security or growth: A regulatory focus perspective on motivations in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 935-954. doi: 10.1037/a0025012
83. Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 588 -598. doi:10.1177/ 0146167206296954
84. Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky driving, sports, and vocations. In M. Zukerman (Ed.), Sensation seeking and risky behavior (pp. 73-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11555-003