Spontaneous slow replication fork progression elicits mitosis alterations in homologous recombination-deficient mammalian cells

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 763-768

  Wilhelm, Therese ^a,b,c,d   Magdalou, Indiana ^a,e   Barascu, Aurelia ^a,e   Techer, Herve ^b,c,d   Debatisse, Michelle ^b,c,d   Lopez, Bernard S ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d Institut Curie   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; HYDROXYUREA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CENTROSOME; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAMMAL CELL; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; APHIDICOLIN; CELL LINE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; DNA REPLICATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HYDROXYUREA; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; MITOSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84892616274     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311520111     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bartkova J, et al. (2005) DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434(7035):864-870.
2. Deng G, Lu Y, Zlotnikov G, Thor AD, Smith HS (1996) Loss of heterozygosity in normal tissue adjacent to breast carcinomas. Science 274(5295):2057-2059.
3. Gorgoulis VG, et al. (2005) Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434(7035):907-913.
4. Krämer A (2005) Centrosome aberrations?hen or egg in cancer initiation and progression? Leukemia 19(7):1142-1144.
5. Lakhani SR, et al. (1999) Genetic alterations in ?normal? luminal and myoepithelial cells of the breast. J Pathol 189(4):496-503.
6. Larson PS, de las Morenas A, Bennett SR, Cupples LA, Rosenberg CL (2002) Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas. Am J Pathol 161(1):283-290.
7. Larson PS, de las Morenas A, Cupples LA, Huang K, Rosenberg CL (1998) Genetically abnormal clones in histologically normal breast tissue. Am J Pathol 152(6):1591-1598.
8. Li Z, et al. (2002) Increased risk of local recurrence is associated with allelic loss in normal lobules of breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 62(4):1000-1003.
9. Nigg EA (2002) Centrosome aberrations: Cause or consequence of cancer progression? Nat Rev Cancer 2(11):815-825.
10. Sluder G, Nordberg JJ (2004) The good, the bad and the ugly: The practical consequences of centrosome amplification. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16(1):49-54.
11. Cox MM, et al. (2000) The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404(6773):37-41.
12. Michel B, et al. (2001) Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(15):8181-8188.
13. Lomonosov M, Anand S, Sangrithi M, Davies R, Venkitaraman AR (2003) Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein. Genes Dev 17(24):3017-3022.
14. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T (2010) Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51- mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37(4):492-502.
15. Saintigny Y, et al. (2001) Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells. EMBO J 20(14):3861-3870.
16. Schlacher K, et al. (2011) Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 145(4):529-542.
17. Hyrien O (2000) Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest. Biochimie 82(1):5-17.
18. Branzei D, Foiani M (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(3):208-219.
19. Daboussi F, et al. (2008) A homologous recombination defect affects replication-fork progression in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 2):162-166.
20. Bertrand P, Lambert S, Joubert C, Lopez BS (2003) Overexpression of mammalian Rad51 does not stimulate tumorigenesis while a dominant-negative Rad51 affects centrosome fragmentation, ploidy and stimulates tumorigenesis, in p53-defective CHO cells. Oncogene 22(48):7587-7592.
21. Daboussi F, Thacker J, Lopez BS (2005) Genetic interactions between RAD51 and its paralogues for centrosome fragmentation and ploidy control, independently of the sensitivity to genotoxic stresses. Oncogene 24(22):3691-3696.
22. Deng CX (2002) Roles of BRCA1 in centrosome duplication. Oncogene 21(40): 6222-6227.
23. Griffin CS, Simpson PJ, Wilson CR, Thacker J (2000) Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol 2(10):757-761.
24. Dodson H, et al. (2004) Centrosome amplification induced by DNA damage occurs during a prolonged G2 phase and involves ATM. EMBO J 23(19):3864-3873.
25. Katsura M, et al. (2009) The ATR-Chk1 pathway plays a role in the generation of centrosome aberrations induced by Rad51C dysfunction. Nucleic Acids Res 37(12): 3959-3968.
26. Kraakman-van der Zwet M, et al. (2002) Brca2 (XRCC11) deficiency results in radioresistant DNA synthesis and a higher frequency of spontaneous deletions. Mol Cell Biol 22(2):669-679.
27. Rodrigue A, et al. (2013) The RAD51 paralogs ensure cellular protection against mitotic defects and aneuploidy. J Cell Sci 126(Pt 1):348-359.
28. Plo I, Lopez B (2009) AKT1 represses gene conversion induced by different genotoxic stresses and induces supernumerary centrosomes and aneuploidy in hamster ovary cells. Oncogene 28(22):2231-2237.
29. Mankouri HW, Huttner D, Hickson ID (2013) How unfinished business from S-phase affects mitosis and beyond. EMBO J 32(20):2661-2671.
30. Cappelli E, Townsend S, Griffin C, Thacker J (2011) Homologous recombination proteins are associated with centrosomes and are required for mitotic stability. Exp Cell Res 317(8):1203-1213.
31. Lesca C, et al. (2005) DNA damage induce gamma-tubulin-RAD51 nuclear complexes in mammalian cells. Oncogene 24(33):5165-5172.
32. Lambert S, Lopez BS (2000) Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms. EMBO J 19(12):3090-3099.
33. Lambert S, Lopez BS (2001) Role of RAD51 in sister-chromatid exchanges in mammalian cells. Oncogene 20(45):6627-6631.
34. Lambert S, Lopez BS (2002) Inactivation of the RAD51 recombination pathway stimulates UV-induced mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Oncogene 21(25):4065-4069.
35. Skoog L, Nordenskjöld B (1971) Effects of hydroxyurea and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl- cytosine on deoxyribonucleotide pools in mouse embryo cells. Eur J Biochem 19(1):81-89.
36. Gudi R, Zou C, Li J, Gao Q (2011) Centrobin-tubulin interaction is required for centriole elongation and stability. J Cell Biol 193(4):711-725.
37. Jeffery JM, Urquhart AJ, Subramaniam VN, Parton RG, Khanna KK (2010) Centrobin regulates the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Oncogene 29(18):2649-2658.
38. Zou C, et al. (2005) Centrobin: A novel daughter centriole-associated protein that is required for centriole duplication. J Cell Biol 171(3):437-445.
39. Smith L, Plug A, Thayer M (2001) Delayed replication timing leads to delayed mitotic chromosome condensation and chromosomal instability of chromosome translocations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(23):13300-13305.
40. Lahkim Bennani-Belhaj K, et al. (2010) The Bloom syndrome protein limits the lethality associated with RAD51 deficiency. Mol Cancer Res 8(3):385-394.
41. Laulier C, Cheng A, Stark JM (2011) The relative efficiency of homology-directed repair has distinct effects on proper anaphase chromosome separation. Nucleic Acids Res 39(14):5935-5944.
42. Anglana M, Apiou F, Bensimon A, Debatisse M (2003) Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: Nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 114(3):385-394.
43. Bester AC, et al. (2011) Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145(3):435-446.
44. Chabosseau P, et al. (2011) Pyrimidine pool imbalance induced by BLM helicase deficiency contributes to genetic instability in Bloom syndrome. Nat Commun 2:368.
45. Gay S, et al. (2010) Nucleotide supply, not local histone acetylation, sets replication origin usage in transcribed regions. EMBO Rep 11(9):698-704.
46. Burrell RA, et al. (2013) Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 494(7438):492-496.
47. Kawabata T, et al. (2011) Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol Cell 41(5):543-553.
48. Letessier A, et al. (2011) Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 470(7332):120-123.
49. Lee SE, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94(3):399-409.
50. Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH (1997) CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90(6):1097-1106.
51. Balczon R, et al. (1995) Dissociation of centrosome replication events from cycles of DNA synthesis and mitotic division in hydroxyurea-arrested Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Cell Biol 130(1):105-115.
52. Hut HM, et al. (2003) Centrosomes split in the presence of impaired DNA integrity during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 14(5):1993-2004.
53. Bourke E, et al. (2007) DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification. EMBO Rep 8(6):603-609.
54. Löffler H, et al. (2007) DNA damage-induced accumulation of centrosomal Chk1 contributes to its checkpoint function. Cell Cycle 6(20):2541-2548.
55. Robinson HM, Black EJ, Brown R, Gillespie DA (2007) DNA mismatch repair and Chk1- dependent centrosome amplification in response to DNA alkylation damage. Cell Cycle 6(8):982-992.
56. Boveri T (1914) [Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren] (Gustav Fisher, Jena, Germany). German.
57. Boveri T (2008) Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J Cell Sci 121(Suppl 1):1-84.
58. H?kansson P, Hofer A, Thelander L (2006) Regulation of mammalian ribonucleotide reduction and dNTP pools after DNA damage and in resting cells. J Biol Chem 281(12): 7834-7841.
59. Niida H, et al. (2010) Essential role of Tip60-dependent recruitment of ribonucleotide reductase at DNA damage sites in DNA repair during G1 phase. Genes Dev 24(4): 333-338.
60. Niida H, Shimada M, Murakami H, Nakanishi M (2010) Mechanisms of dNTP supply that play an essential role in maintaining genome integrity in eukaryotic cells. Cancer Sci 101(12):2505-2509.
61. Walsh T, King MC (2007) Ten genes for inherited breast cancer. Cancer Cell 11(2): 103-105.
62. Plo I, et al. (2008) AKT1 inhibits homologous recombination by inducing cytoplasmic retention of BRCA1 and RAD51. Cancer Res 68(22):9404-9412.
63. WiegantWW, Overmeer RM, Godthelp BC, van Buul PP, Zdzienicka MZ (2006) Chinese hamster cell mutant, V-C8, a model for analysis of Brca2 function. Mutat Res 600(1-2): 79-88.
64. Michalet X, et al. (1997) Dynamic molecular combing: Stretching the whole human genome for high-resolution studies. Science 277(5331):1518-1523.