Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: Implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment

Journal of the National Cancer Institute - Monographs

Volumn , Issue 47, 2013, Pages 182-187

  Kim, Hyun Suk ^a   Lee, Sungkyoung ^a   Cappella, Joseph N ^a   Vera, Lisa ^b   Emery, Sherry ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RESEARCH; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING BAN; SMOKING CESSATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; SMOKING; SOCIAL MEDIA;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; NEOPLASMS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84892465306     PISSN: 10526773     EISSN: 17456614     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt018     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
2. Emery S, Kim Y, Choi YK, Szczypka G, Wakefield M, Chaloupka FJ. The effects of smoking-related television advertising on smoking and intentions to quit among adults in the United States: 1999-2007. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(4):751-757.
3. Ibrahim JK, Glantz SA. The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967-2006. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1383-1396.
4. Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 1):i35-i47.
5. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project Web site. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx. Published January 15, 2013. Accessed April 28, 2013.
6. Napoli PM. Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2011.
7. Rainie L, Wellman B. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2012.
8. Duggan M, Brenner J. The demographics of social media users-2012. Pew Internet & American Life Project Web site. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx. Published February 14, 2013. Accessed April 28, 2013.
9. Purcell K, Rainie L, Mitchell A, Rosenstiel T, Olmstead K. Understanding the participatory news consumer: how Internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Pew Internet & American Life Project Web site. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx. Published March 1, 2010. Accessed April 28, 2013.
10. Jenkins H, Ford S, Green J. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2013.
11. Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, et al. Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2154-2160.
12. Terry-McElrath YM, Wakefield MA, Emery S, et al. State anti-tobacco advertising and smoking outcomes by gender and race/ethnicity. Ethn Health. 2007;12(4):339-362.
13. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):901-907.
14. Emery S, Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Televised state-sponsored antitobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999-2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(7):639-645.
15. Berger J. Contagious: Why Things Catch On. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2013.
16. Ancker JS, Carpenter KM, Greene P, et al. Peer-to-peer communication, cancer prevention, and the internet. J Health Commun. 2009;14(suppl 1):38-46.
17. Niederdeppe J, Hornik RC, Kelly BJ, et al. Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Commun. 2007;22(2):153-167.
18. Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ. Using Web 2.0 technologies to enhance evidence-based medical information. J Health Commun. 2011;16(suppl 1):45-58.
19. Hesse BW, O'Connell M, Augustson EM, Chou WY, Shaikh AR, Rutten LJ. Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: engaging community intelligence. J Health Commun. 2011;16(suppl 1):10-31.
20. Daugherty T, Eastin MS, Bright L. Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. J Interact Advert. 2008;8(2):16-25.
21. Hastall MR, Knobloch-Westerwick S. Severity, efficacy, and evidence type as determinants of health message exposure.Health Commun. 2013;28(4):378-388.
22. Garrett RK. Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Hum Commun Res. 2011;37(2):255-274.
23. van Noort G, Antheunis ML, van Reijmersdal EA. Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. J Mark Commun. 2012;18(1):39-53.
24. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5(4):323-370.
25. Rozin P, Royzman EB. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2001;5(4):296-320.
26. Shoemaker PJ. Hardwired for news: using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. J Commun. 1996;46(3):32-47.
27. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453-458.
28. Donsbach W.Exposure to political content in newspapers: the impact of cognitive dissonance on readers' selectivity. Eur J Commun. 1991;6(2):155-186.
29. Knobloch S, Hastall M, Zillmann D, Callison C. Imagery effects on the selective reading of Internet newsmagazines. Communic Res. 2003;30(1):3-29.
30. Meffert MF, Chung S, Joiner AJ, Waks L, Garst J. The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. J Commun. 2006;56(1):27-51.
31. Zillmann D, Chen L, Knobloch S, Callison C. Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to Internet news reports. Communic Res. 2004;31(1):58-81.
32. Zillmann D, Knobloch S, Yu HS. Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychol. 2001;3(4):301-324.
33. Harcup T, O'Neill D. What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journal Stud. 2001;2(2):261-280.
34. Shoemaker PJ, Cohen AA. News around the World: Content, Practitioners, and the Public. New York, NY: Routledge; 2006.
35. Stephens M. A History of News. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
36. Shoemaker PJ, Chang T, Brendlinger N. Deviance as a predictor of newsworthiness: coverage of international events in the U.S. media. In: McLaughlin ML, ed. Communication Yearbook. Vol 10. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1987:348-365.
37. Gelpi C. Performing on cue? The formation of public opinion toward war. J Conflict Resolut. 2010;54(1):88-116.
38. Lee JH. News values, media coverage, and audience attention: an analysis of direct and mediated causal relationships. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2009;86(1):175-190.
39. Lee JH. Effects of news deviance and personal involvement on audience story selection: a web-tracking analysis. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2008;85(1):41-60.
40. Ho JYC, Dempsey M. Viral marketing: motivations to forward online content. J Bus Res. 2010;63(9-10):1000-1006.
41. Huang C-C, Lin T-C, Lin K-J. Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2009;8(3):160-169.
42. Lee CS, Ma L. News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(2):331-339.
43. Phelps JE, Lewis R, Mobilio L, Perry D, Raman N. Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. J Advert Res. 2004;44(4):333-348.
44. Berger J, Milkman KL. What makes online content viral? J Mark Res. 2012;49(2):192-205.
45. Carter OB, Donovan R, Jalleh G. Using viral e-mails to distribute tobacco control advertisements: an experimental investigation. J Health Commun. 2011;16(7):698-707.
46. Eckler P, Bolls P. Spreading the virus: emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. J Interact Advert. 2011;11(2):1-11.
47. Heath C, Heath D. Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. New York, NY: Random House; 2007.
48. Rosen E. The Anatomy of Buzz Revisited: Real-Life Lessons in Word-Of-Mouth Marketing. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2009.
49. Thorson E. Changing patterns of news consumption and participation: news recommendation engines. Inf Commun Soc. 2008; 11(4):473-489.
50. Loewenstein J, Heath C. The repetition-break plot structure: a cognitive influence on selection in the marketplace of ideas. Cogn Sci. 2009;33(1):1-19.
51. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer; 1986.
52. Park HS, Levine TR, Kingsley Westerman CY, Orfgen T, Foregger S. The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and atitude change: a test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33(1):81-102.
53. Johnson BT, Maio GR, Smith-McLallen A. Communication and attitude change: causes, processes, and effects. In: Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP, eds. The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:617-669.
54. Lee S, Cappella JN, Lerman C, Strasser AA. Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(4):282-290.
55. Zhao X, Strasser A, Cappella JN, Lerman C, Fishbein M. A measure of perceived argument strength: reliability and validity. Commun Methods Meas. 2011;5(1):48-75.
56. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC [computer program]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net; 2007.
57. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1973:105-142.
58. Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2012.
59. Knobloch-Westerwick S, Sarge MA. Impacts of exemplification and efficacy as characteristics of an online weight-loss message on selective exposure and subsequent weight-loss behavior [published online ahead of print March 6, 2013]. Commun Res. doi:10.1177/0093650213478440.
60. Morgan SE, Palmgreen P, Stephenson MT, Hoyle RH, Lorch EP. Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements. J Commun. 2003;53(3):512-526.
61. Berger J. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(7):891-893.