The effects of smoking-related television advertising on smoking and intentions to quit among adults in the United States: 1999-2007

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 751-757

  Emery, Sherry ^a   Kim, Yoonsang ^a   Choi, Young Ku ^a   Szczypka, Glen ^a   Wakefield, Melanie ^b   Chaloupka, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TELEVISION; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; LOGISTIC MODELS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEVISION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859067702     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300443     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California Tobacco Control Program reduced smoking? JAMA. 2001;280(10):893-899.
2. Ibrahim JK, Glantz SA. The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967-2006. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1383-1396. (Pubitemid 351377675)
3. Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E, Ray S. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(2):233-238. (Pubitemid 32113181)
4. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19.Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH publication no. 07-6242, June 2008. Available at: http://cancercontrol.cancer. gov/tcrb/monographs/19/monograph19.html. Accessed July 9, 2010.
5. Communities putting prevention to work: CDC awards $372.8 million to 44 communities. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/Features/ChronicPreventionGrants. Accessed July 9, 2010.
6. Bruell A. FDA issues pair of proposals for $600 million combined anti-smoking push. Advertising Age, November 1, 2011. Available at: http://adage.com/article/news/fda-issues-proposals-600-million-anti-smoking- push/230763. Accessed January 23, 2012.
7. Wakefield M, Szczypka G, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Mixed messages on tobacco: comparative exposure to public health, tobacco company and pharmaceutical company sponsored tobacco-related television campaigns in the United States, 1999-2003. Addiction. 2005; 100(12):1875-1883. (Pubitemid 41775213)
8. Szczypka G, Wakefield MA, Emery S, Terry-McElrath YM, Flay BR, Chaloupka FJ. Working to make an image: an analysis of three Philip Morris corporate image media campaigns. Tob Control. 2007;16(5):344-350.
9. Emery S, Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Televised state-sponsored antitobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999-2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(7): 639-645. (Pubitemid 41003085)
10. Wakefied MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behavior. Lancet. Published online October 7, 2010. doi:.
11. Chaloupka FJ. Macro-social influences: the effects of prices and tobacco-control policies on the demand for tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(Suppl 1): S105-S109.
12. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal M, et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence: time series analysis. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1443-1450.
13. Hyland A, Wakefield M, Higbee C, Szczypka G, Cummings KM. Anti-tobacco television advertising and indicators of smoking cessation in adults: a cohort study. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(3):348-354. (Pubitemid 43966716)
14. Nielsen Station Index: US television household estimates. September 2007. New York, NY: Nielsen Media Research; 2007.
15. Szczypka G,Emery S, Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ. The Adaptation and Use of Nielsen Media Research Commercial Ratings Data to Measure Potential Exposure to Televised Smoking-Related Advertisements. Chicago IL: University of Illinois at Chicago; 2003. ImpacTeen research paper no. 29.
16. Current Population Survey design and methodol-ogy, technical paper 66. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2006.
17. Orzechowski W, Walker R. The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski and Walker; 2003.
18. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index database. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/home. htm#data. Accessed July 1, 2010.
19. ImpacTeen.Tobacco Control Policy and Prevalence Data: 1991-2008 Codebook and Definitions. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago; 2009.
20. Pollay RW, Siddarth S, Siegel M, et al. The last straw? Cigarette advertising and realized market shares among youths and adults, 1979-1993. J Mark. 1996; 60(2):1-16.
21. Information Technology Laboratory of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Federal Informa-tion Processing Standards Publications. Washington, DC: FIPS PUBS; 2010.
22. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress-A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1989. DHHS publication no. (CDC)89-8411.
23. Messer K, Trinidad DR, Al-Delaimy WK, Pierce JP. Smoking cessation rates in the United States: a compari-son of young adult and older smokers. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):317-322. (Pubitemid 351317567)
24. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2000.
25. Terry-McElrath YM, Wakefield MA, Emery S, et al. State anti-tobacco advertising and smoking outcomes by gender and race/ethnicity. Ethn Health. 2007; 12(4):339-362. (Pubitemid 47300292)
26. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(3):425-431. (Pubitemid 40315117)
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs-2007. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; October, 2007.
28. Wakefield MA, Spittal MJ, Yong H-H, Durkin SJ, Borland R. Effects of mass media campaign exposure intensity and durability on quit attempts in a population-based cohort study. Health Education Research. Advance access published July 5, 2011. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 21730252. Accessed July 12, 2011.
29. Tauras JA, Chaloupka FJ, Emery S. The impact of advertising on nicotine replacement therapy demand. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(10):2351-2358. (Pubitemid 40313378)
30. Bolton LE, Cohen JB, Bloom PN. Does marketing products as remedies create "get out of jail free cards"? J Consum Res. 2006;33(June):71-81. (Pubitemid 44023313)
31. McDaniel PA, Malone RE. The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(3):452-461.
32. Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, et al. Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2154-2160. (Pubitemid 44865106)
33. Fishbein M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory. 2003;13:164-183. (Pubitemid 37084658)