The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967-2006

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1383-1396

  Ibrahim, Jennifer K ^a   Glantz, Stanton A ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SMOKING; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; ARTICLE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HISTORY; LEGAL ASPECT; MASS MEDIUM; POLITICS; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH PROMOTION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; POLITICS; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548045304     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097006     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Action on Smoking and Health. How Banzhaf's successful antismoking crusade began. Available at: http://www.no-smoking.org/nov99/11-18-99-1.html. Accessed June 22, 2004.
2. Hamilton JL. The demand for cigarettes: advertising, the health scare, and the cigarette advertising ban. Rev Econ Stat. 1972;54:401-411.
3. Orzechowski W, Walker RC. The Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation. Vol 39. Arlington, Va: Orzechowski and Walker Inc; 2004.
4. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2003. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/reports/cigarette05/050809cigrpt. pdf. Accessed May 24, 2007.
5. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hershey JC, Haviland ML. Getting to the truth: evaluation national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:901-907 [published correction appears in Am J Public Health. 2003;93:703].
6. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs-August 1999. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.
7. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2001;10:124-134.
8. Glantz SA, Begay ME. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA. 1994;272:1176-1182.
9. Monardi F, Glantz SA. Are tobacco industry campaign contributions influencing state legislative behavior? Am J Public Health. 1998;88:918-923.
10. Moore S, Wolfe SM, Lindes D, Douglas CE. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA. 1994;272:1171-1175.
11. Aguinaga S, Glantz SA. The use of public records acts to interfere with tobacco control. Tob Control. 1995;4:222-230.
12. Dearlove JV, Bialous SA, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tob Control. 2002;11:94-104.
13. Dearlove JV, Glantz SA. Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:257-265.
14. Tsoukalas TH, Glantz SA. Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA. Tob Control. 2003;12:214-220.
15. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA. 1998;279:772-777.
16. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med. 2002;35:511-518.
17. Designing and Implementing an Effective Tobacco Counter-Marketing Campaign. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
18. Bauer U, Johnson T, Hopkins R, Brooks R. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program. JAMA. 2000;284:723-728.
19. Intersurvey. The truth behind the American Legacy Foundation's advertising campaign: a quantitative look at the impact and messages of three ALF ads. June 2000. Philip Morris. Bates no. 2085188809/8814. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zwq12c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
20. Niedereppe J, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML. Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:255-257.
21. Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S. The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media campaigns. Tob Control. 2001;10:9-15.
22. Independent Evaluation Consortium. Interim Report. Final Report of the Independent Evaluation of the California Tobacco Prevention and Education Program: Wave 2 Data, 1998; Wave 1 and Wave 2 Data Comparisons, 1996-1998. Rockville, Md: Gallup Organization; 1998.
23. Farrelly M, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:425-431.
24. Minnesota Department of Health. The Minnesota Plan for Nonsmoking and Health: Report and Recommendations of the Technical Advisory Committee on Nonsmoking and Health. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Health; 1984. Bates no. TIMN0144163/4332. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nwb92f00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
25. Glantz SA, Balbach ED. Tobacco War: Inside the California Battles. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
26. Tsoukalas TH, Ibrahim JK, Glantz SA. Shifting tides: Minnesota tobacco politics. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tcpmus/MN2003. Accessed June 20, 2004.
27. Begay ME, Glantz SA. Political Expenditures by the Tobacco Industry in California State Politics. San Francisco: University of California; 1991.
28. California Department of Health Services. California's tobacco education media campaign. Available at: http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/pubs/ FSMediaCamp.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2007.
29. Tobacco education media campaign scripts. Sacramento: Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services; 2002.
30. Mass General Law ch 254, Acts of 1992 ed.
31. Begay ME, Glantz SA. Question 1 expenditures in Massachusetts, USA. Tob Control. 1997;6:213-218.
32. Koh HK. An analysis of the successful 1992 Massachusetts tobacco tax initiative. Tob Control. 1996;5:220-225.
33. Begay ME, Glantz SA. Question 1 tobacco education outlays: from the 1994 fiscal year to the 1996 fiscal year. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib. org/ctcre/tcpmus/MA1995. Accessed February 20, 2005.
34. Connolly G, Robbins H. Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Available at: http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/pdfs/promising/massachusetts-tobaccocontrol- program.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2007.
35. Robbins H, Krakow M. Evolution of a comprehensive tobacco control programme: building system capacity and strategic partnerships-lessons from Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2000;9:423-430.
36. Aguinaga Bialous S, Glantz SA. Tobacco control in Arizona, 1973-1997. Available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tcpmus/AZ1997. Accessed March 25, 2004
37. Aguinaga Bialous S, Glantz SA. Arizona's tobacco control initiative illustrates the need for continuing oversight by tobacco control advocates. Tob Control. 1999;8:141-151.
38. Administrative and Financial Services, Procurement Office. Solicitation Number H6-001: Media Services. Phoenix: Arizona Department of Health Services; 1995.
39. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Tobacco Industry Political Expenditures and Tobacco Policy Making in Oregon: 1985-1997. San Francisco: University of California; 1998.
40. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. The passage and initial implementation of Oregon's Measure 44. Tob Control. 1999;8:311-322.
41. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:762-767.
42. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Tobacco Industry Political Power and Influence in Florida From 1979 to 1999. San Francisco: University of California; 1999.
43. The State of Florida v The American Tobacco Company, no. 95-1466 AH (15th Cir 1997). Available at: http://stic.neu.edu/Fl/flsettle.htm. Accessed May 17, 2007.
44. Hicks JJ. The strategy behind Florida's "truth" campaign. Tob Control. 2001;10:3-5.
45. National Association of Attorneys General. Multistate settlement with the tobacco industry. Available at: http://www.naag.org/upload/ 1109185724_1032468605_cigmsa.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2003.
46. Eagan J. Prop 99 anti-smoking media campaign. May 30, 1998. RJ Reynolds. Bates no. 507640367-507640370. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ qxd24d00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
47. Lavack AM. Tobacco Industry Denormalization Campaigns: A Review and Evaluation. Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Winnipeg; 2001.
48. Mahood G. Tobacco Industry Denormalization: Telling the Truth About the Tobacco Industry's Role in the Tobacco Epidemic. Toronto, Ontario: Non-Smokers' Rights Association; 2000.
49. Balbach ED, Glantz SA. Tobacco control advocates must demand highquality media campaigns: the California experience. Tob Control. 1998;7:397-408.
50. Ibrahim J, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry efforts to influence media interventions for tobacco control: lessons learned. In: Davis RM, ed. Use of the Media to Promote and Discourage Tobacco Use. Monograph no. 18. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute. In press.
51. Brozek M. [Memorandum to Roger Mozingo regarding Minnesota legislative status.] April 11, 1985. Tobacco Institute. Bates no. TIMN0457950/7958. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xzs42f00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
52. Williams J, Isenberg P. Case study on Proposition 99 (the cigarette tax). Sacramento: California State University; 1995.
53. Assunta M, Chapman S. Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity. Tob Control. 2004;13(suppl 2):ii37-ii42.
54. Carter SM. From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians. Tob Control. 2003;12:iii71-iii78.
55. Public relations strategies to address the Minnesota plan for nonsmoking and health. September 1984. Tobacco Institute. Bates no. TIMN0140510/0525. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nia92f00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
56. Landman A, Ling P, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs protect the tobacco industry and hurt tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:917-930.
57. Brozek M. [Memorandum to Michael Kerrigan regarding the Minnesota Technical Advisory Committee on Nonsmoking and Health.] Tobacco Institute. Bates no. TNJB0000249/0252. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ gzx96d00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
58. Mozingo R. Confidential information on new TI program. August 13, 1984. Tobacco Institute. Bates no. TIMN0150840. Available at: http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu/tid/poy82f00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
59. Helping youth decide. Tobacco Institute. Bates no. TIMN0013764/3789. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/llo03f00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
60. Farrelly M, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control. 12(suppl 1):i35-i47, 2003.
61. Bell HH. Youth smoking prevention meeting. October 13, 1998. Lorillard Tobacco Co. Bates no. 80305972/5974. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf. edu/tid/hjz13c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
62. Mandel LL, Bialous SA, Glantz SA. Avoiding "truth": tobacco industry promotion of life skills training. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:868-879.
63. Develop and implement a YSP communication platform and strategy key initiative update. April 1999. Philip Morris. Bates no. 2078044246/4255. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/ tid/dfw75c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
64. Minnesota Tobacco-Use Prevention Initiative, 1989-1990: A Report to the 1991 Legislature. St Paul: Minnesota Department of Health; 1991.
65. Ragsdale J. Fund-raiser has foes fuming: tobacco lobbyists among sponsors of Carlson event. St Paul Pioneer Press. October 4, 1994:1C, 4C.
66. 1994 proposed budget. November 12, 1993. Lorillard Tobacco Co. Bates no. 91082882/2938. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/hhx90e00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
67. McGrath DJ. Behind the budget fight: politics and prudence. Minneapolis Star-Tribune. May 23, 1993:1B.
68. Malmgren K. California's antitobacco advertising campaign. April 18, 1990. American Tobacco. Bates no. 980124334/4337. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/aes90c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
69. Biener L. Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl II):ii43-ii46.
70. Hamilton WL, Rodger CN, Chen X, Njobe TK, Kling R, Norton GD. Independent Evaluation of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program. Eighth Annual Report: January 1994-June 2001. Cambridge, Mass: Abt Associates; 2003.
71. Kempthorne J. Massachusetts: Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Expenses of the Tobacco Industry and Its Allies. Washington, DC: Common Cause Education Fund; 2003.
72. KLM. KLM Remarks for the 12-10 Exec Cmte Mtg, The Massachusetts Plan Draft #3. December 2, 1992. Bates no. TI11580024/0041. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/vxj40c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
73. Begay ME. Undermining the Mandate: How Massachusetts Spent Tobacco Education and Prevention Funds, 1994-2001 Fiscal Years. Amherst: School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts; 2000.
74. Ariz Rev Stat. Laws of 1995, Chapter 275: Tobacco Tax Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (House Bill 2275); 1995.
75. McKinnon J. Lawmaker questions the effectiveness of antismoking ads. Wall Street Journal. November 11, 1998:F4.
76. Florida's key legislative issues for 1999. Tallahassee Democrat. February 28, 1999:A9.
77. Kennedy J. "Truth" drive director is kicked out: Peter Mitchell was fired a day after teens protested the anti-smoking campaign's possible elimination. Orlando Sentinel. March 18, 1999:D1.
78. Kennedy J, Perez R. State house may pull plug on "truth." Forthcoming in the Legacy Library.
79. Steves D. Oregon lawmakers strip anti-smoking funds; panel plans to move money into bill. (Eugene, Ore) Register-Guard. June 21, 2001. Available at: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-8347802_ITM (restricted access). Accessed May 17, 2007.
80. Lopez L. Tobacco prevention program relaunched. The Oregonian. December 17, 2003:2.
81. Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976-1997: an update. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;49:1-9.
82. Ibrahim J, Glantz S. Tobacco Control Policymaking in California, 2001-2003: No Longer Finishing First. San Francisco: Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California; 2003.
83. Ibrahim J, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns. Tob Control. 2006;15:50-58.
84. The State of Texas v The American Tobacco Company LEXIS 17235 (ED Texas 1998). Available at: http://stic.neu.edu/Tx/1STAMD.htm. Accessed May 19, 2007.
85. White J, Bero L. Public health under attack: The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health. 2003;94:240-250.
86. Bialous SA, Fox BJ, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:62-67.
87. Malmgren KL. Memorandum to Samuel D. Chilcote, Jr. April 18, 1990. Bates no. 980124334/4337. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/aes90c00. Accessed May 1, 2007.
88. Philips JW Jr. Letter from Jim W Philips, Jr, of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP, to John A. Payton, Esq, of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. 2001. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu (forthcoming).
89. Lorillard Tobacco Company v American Legacy Foundation ("Lorillard V. Legacy, N. Car."), Complaint 02 CVS 02170, (General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, Wake County, NC, February 19, 2002).
90. American Legacy Foundation v Lorillard Tobacco Company, 895 A2d 874 LEXIS 150 (Del Ch 2005).
91. American Legacy Foundation v Lorillard Tobacco Company, 886 A2d 1 LEXIS 124 (Del Ch 2005).
92. Lorillard Tobacco Company v American Legacy Foundation 903 A2d 728 LEXIS 400 (Del 2006)
93. Memo in support of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's Motion Challenging Pollution of Jury Pool and Extrajudicial Communications with Jurors (re: Laurence Lucier and Laurie Lucier v Philip Morris Incorporated (Calif Super Ct 2002). Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu (forthcoming).
94. Reply to Memo in support of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's Motion Challenging Pollution of Jury Pool and Extrajudicial Communications with Jurors (re: Laurence Lucier and Laurie Lucier v Philip Morris Incorporated (Calif Super Ct 2002). Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu (forthcoming).
95. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v Bonta, 272 F Supp 2d 1085 at 1103 LEXIS 12570 (ED Calif 2003), aff'd 384 F3d 1126 (9th Cir Calif 2004).
96. Lazarus D. Courts blow off tobacco. San Francisco Chronicle. July 27, 2003:I-1.
97. Martin M. Court snuffs complaint on cigarette tax spending; tobacco firms objected to state's anti-smoking ads. San Francisco Chronicle. July 23, 2003:A-11.
98. Kuiper NM, Nelson DE, Schooley M. Evidence of Effectiveness: A Summary of State Tobacco Control Program Evaluation Literature. Atlanta, Ga: Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.