Using web 2.0 technologies to enhance evidence-based medical information

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 45-58

  Metzger, Miriam J ^a   Flanagin, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84856368366     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.589881     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Albarracin, D., &, Vargas, P. (2010). Attitudes and persuasion: From biology to social responses to persuasive intent. In S. T. Fiske., D. T. Gilbert., & G. Lindzey. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (, 5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 394-427). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 149-159.
3. Bernhardt, J. M., Mayes, D., &, Kreuter, M. W. (2011). Dissemination 2.0: Closing the gap between knowledge and practice with new media and marketing. Journal of Health Communication.
4. Chen, C., &, Hernon, P. (1982). Information seeking: assessing and anticipating user needs. New York: Neal-Schuman.
5. Connolly, T., &, Thorn, B. K. (1990). Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications. In J. Fulk. & C. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 219-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Eysenbach, G. (2008). Credibility of health information and digital media: New perspective and implications for youth. In M. J. Metzger. & A. J. Flanagin. (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 123-154). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Flanagin, A. J., &, Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72, 137-148.
8. Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., &, Markov, A. (2011). User-generated ratings and the evaluation of credibility and product quality in ecommerce transactions. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, p. 1-10.
9. Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics (), 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10. Fox, S. (2008). The engaged e-Patient. Retrieved November 8, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/The-Engaged-Epatient-Population.aspx?r=1
11. Fox, S. (2009, June 11). The social life of health information. Retrieved November 8, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social- Life-of-Health-Information.aspx
12. Fox, S. (2010, July 16). Crowdsourcing a survey: Health topics. Retrieved November 8, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2010/July/ Crowdsourcing-a-Survey-Health-Topics.aspx
13. Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M., Monge, P. R., &, Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6, 60-87.
14. Fulk, J., Heino, R., Flanagin, A. J., Monge, P., &, Bar, F. (2004). A test of the individual action model for organizational information commons. Organization Science, 15, 569-585. (Pubitemid 39453865)
15. Gannes, L. (2010). When social replaces search, what can you do to monetize? Retrieved October 29, 2010, from http://gigaom.com/2010/03/24/when- social-replaces-search-what-can-you-do-to-monetize
16. Gigerenzer, G., &, Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Hesse, B. W., Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Croyle, R. T., Arora, N. K., &, Rimer, B. K. (2005). Trust and sources of health information: The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: Findings from the first health information national trends survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 2618-2624. (Pubitemid 41785059)
18. Hesse, B. W., O'Connell, M., Augustson, E. M., Chou, W. S., Shaikh, A. R., &, Rutten, L. J. F. (2011). Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: Engaging community intelligence. Journal of Health Communication.
19. Horrigan, J., &, Rainie, L. (2006). When facing a tough decision, 60 million Americans now seek the internets help: The Internets growing role in lifes major moments. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/ 19/when-facing-a-tough-decision-60-million-americans-now-seek-the-internets-help
20. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., &, Kelley, J. J. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How todays Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.
22. Kirkpatrick, M. (2009). Social networking now more popular than email, report finds. Retrieved August 12, 2010, from http://www.readwriteweb.com/ archives/social
23. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., &, McCann, R. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. Kalbfleisch. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 27 (pp. 293-335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., &, Medders, R. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413-439.
25. Morahan-Martin, J. (2004). How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 497-510. (Pubitemid 39485241)
26. O'Reilly, C. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 756-771.
27. Park, T. K. (1993). The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63, 318-351.
28. Pirolli, P. (2005). Rational analyses of information foraging on the Web. Cognitive Science, 29, 343-373. (Pubitemid 40899970)
29. Prabha, C., Connaway, L. S., Olszewski, L., &, Jenkins, L. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63, 74-89.
30. Rees, A. M., &, Saracevic, T. (1966). The measurability of relevance. Proceedings of the American Documentation Institute, 3, 225-234.
31. Rice, R. E., &, Atkin, C. (Eds.). (2001). Public communication campaigns (), 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Rieh, S. Y., &, Danielson, D. R. (2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In B. Cronin. (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 41, pp. 307-364). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
33. Saracevic, T. (1970). The concept of relevance in information science: A historical review. In T. Saracevic. (Ed.), Introduction to information science (pp. 111-151). New York: Bowker.
34. Savolainen, R. (2007). Media credibility and cognitive authority: The case of seeking orienting information. Information Research, 12 (3). Retrieved November 8, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/12-3/paper319.html
35. Self, C. (2009). Credibility. In D. W. Stacks. & M. B. Salwen. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (, 2nd ed., pp. 435-456). New York: Routledge.
36. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
37. Sorkin, A. R. (2010, June). Facebook tops 500 million users. Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/facebook- tops-500-million-users
38. Sundar, S. (2008). Technology and credibility: Cognitive heuristics cued by modality, agency, interactivity and navigability. In M. J. Metzger. & A. J. Flanagin. (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.
40. Taraborelli, D. (2008). How the Web is changing the way we trust. In K. Waelbers., A. Briggle., & P. Brey. (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
41. Wang, P., &, Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study 1: Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 115-133. (Pubitemid 128594911)
42. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
43. Wirth, W., Bocking, T., Karnowski, V., &, von Pape, T. (2007). Heuristic and systematic use of search engines. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 778-800.
44. Yarow, J. (2010). Facebook was more popular in the U.S. than Google last week. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook- was-more-popular-in-the-us-than-google-last-week-2010-3