EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: Looking back and ahead

Transgenic Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-25

  Devos, Yann ^a   Aguilera, Jaime ^a   Diveki, Zoltán ^a   Gomes, Ana ^a   Liu, Yi ^a   Paoletti, Claudia ^a   du Jardin, Patrick ^b   Herman, Lieve ^c   Perry, Joe N ^d   Waigmann, Elisabeth ^a  

^a EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^d Oaklands Barn   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Food and feed safety; GM animals; GM plants; GM trees; Monitoring; New biotechnology based plant breeding techniques; Protection goals; Safeguard clauses; Safety

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN UNION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; HUMAN; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BIOTECHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; HUMANS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84892437852     PISSN: 09628819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Adarme-Vega TC, Lim DKY, Timmins M, Vernen F, Li Y, Schenk PM (2012) Microalgal biofactories: a promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microb Cell Fact 11: 96.
2. ADAS (2013) Review of the strategies for the comprehensive food and feed safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants per se (in press).
3. Aguilera J, Nielsen KM, Sweet J (2013) Risk assessment of GM trees in the EU: current regulatory framework and guidance. iForest 6: 127-131.
4. Andow DA, Hilbeck A (2004) Science-based risk assessment for non target effects of transgenic crops. Bioscience 54: 637-649.
5. Arjó G, Portero M, Piñol C, Viñas J, Matias-Guiu X, Capell T, Bartholomaeus A, Parrott W, Christou P (2013) Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study claiming that Roundup™ Ready corn or the herbicide Roundup™ cause cancer in rats. Transgenic Res 22: 255-267.
6. Bachman PM, Bolognesi R, Moar WJ, Mueller GM, Paradise MS, Ramaseshadri P, Tan J, Uffman JP, Warren JA, Wiggins BE, Levine SL (2013) Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity of a double-stranded RNA with targeted activity against western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte). Transgenic Res. doi: 10. 1007/s11248-013-9716-5.
7. Baum JA, Bogaert T, Clinton W, Heck GR, Feldmann P, Ilagan O, Johnson S, Plaetinck G, Munyikwa T, Pleau M, Vaughn T, Roberts J (2007) Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1322-1326.
8. Beech CJ, Koukidou M, Morrison NI, Alphey L (2012) Genetically modified insects: science, use, status and regulation. Collect Biosaf Rev 6: 66-124.
9. Benedict M, Eckerstorfer M, Franz G, Gaugitsch H, Greiter A, Heissenberger A, Knols B, Kumschick S, Nentwig W, Rabitsch W (2010) Defining environmental risk assessment criteria for genetically modified insects to be placed on the EU market. Supporting Publications 2010: EN-71 [200 pp], EFSA. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/71e. pdf.
10. Bolognesi R, Ramaseshadri P, Anderson J, Bachman P, Clinton W, Flannagan R, Ilagan O, Lawrence C, Levine S, Moar W, Mueller G, Tan J, Uffman J, Wiggins E, Heck G, Segers G (2012) Characterizing the mechanism of action of double-stranded RNA activity against western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte). PLoS ONE 7(10): e47534.
11. Burand JP, Hunter WB (2012) RNAi: future in insect management. J Invertebrat Pathol 112: S68-S74.
12. CERA (2011) Problem formulation for the environmental risk assessment of RNAi plants: conference proceedings. http://cera-gmc. org/docs/cera_publications/pub_08_2011. pdf.
13. COGEM (2012) Algae and genetic modification. Research, production and risks. Research report commissioned by COGEM (CGM 2012-05). http://www. cogem. net/index. cfm/en/publications/publicatie/research-report-algae-and-genetic-modification-research-production-and-risks.
14. Cowx IG, Bolland JD, Nunn AD, Kerins G, Stein J, Blackburn J, Hart A, Henry C, Britton JR, Copp G, Peeler E (2010) Defining environmental risk assessment criteria for genetically modified fishes to be placed on the EU market. Supporting Publications 2010: EN-69 [187 pp], EFSA. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/69e. pdf.
15. de Jong TJ, Rong J (2013) Crop to wild gene flow: does more sophisticated research provide better risk assessment? Environ Sci Pol 27: 135-140.
16. Deluyker H, Silano V (2012) The first ten years of activity of EFSA: A success story. EFSA J 10(10): 1-6 [se101]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/es101. pdf.
17. Devos Y, Hails RS, Messéan A, Perry JN, Squire GR (2012) Feral genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape from seed import spills: are concerns scientifically justified? Transgenic Res 21: 1-21.
18. Dolezel M, Miklau M, Hilbeck A, Otto M, Eckerstorfer M, Heissenberger A, Tappeser B, Gaugitsch H (2011) Scrutinizing the current practice of the environmental risk assessment of GM maize applications for cultivation in the EU. Environ Sci Eur 23: 33.
19. EC (2013) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 of 3 April 2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006. Off J EU L157: 1-47. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=OJ: L: 2013: 157: FULL: EN: PDF.
20. EFSA (2004a) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Austrian invoke of Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 78: 1-13. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/78. pdf.
21. EFSA (2004b) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Greek invoke of Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 79: 1-8. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/78a. pdf.
22. EFSA (2005a) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the notification (Reference C/ES/01/01) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 for import, feed and industrial processing and cultivation. EFSA J 181: 1-33. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/181. pdf.
23. EFSA (2005b) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the notification (Reference C/F/96/05. 10) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize Bt11, for cultivation, feed and industrial processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Syngenta Seeds. EFSA J 213: 1-33. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/213. pdf.
24. EFSA (2005c) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 228: 1-14. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/228. pdf.
25. EFSA (2006a) Guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed by the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA J 99: 1-100. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/99. pdf.
26. EFSA (2006b) Clarifications of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms following a request from the Commission related to the opinions on insect resistant genetically modified Bt11 (Reference C/F/96/05. 10) and 1507 (Reference C/ES/01/01) maize. EFSA J 181: 1-33. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1561. pdf.
27. EFSA (2006c) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the Post Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 319: 1-27. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/319. pdf.
28. EFSA (2006d) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the notification (Reference C/SE/96/3501) for the placing on the market of genetically modified potato EH92-527-1 with altered starch composition, for cultivation and production of starch, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from BASF Plant Science. EFSA J 323: 1-20. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/323. pdf.
29. EFSA (2006e) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to genetically modified crops (Bt176 maize, MON 810 maize, T25 maize, Topas 19/2 oilseed rape and Ms1xRf1 oilseed rape) subject to safeguard clauses invoked according to Article 16 of Directive 90/220/EEC. EFSA J 338: 1-15. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/338. pdf.
30. EFSA (2006f) Guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their derived products intended for food and feed use by the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA J 374: 1-115. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/374. pdf.
31. EFSA (2006g) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and to Article 18 of Directive 2002/53/EC. EFSA J 411: 1-26. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/411. pdf.
32. EFSA (2006h) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for renewal of authorisations of existing GMO products lawfully placed on the market, notified according to Articles 8 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA J 435: 1-4. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/435. pdf.
33. EFSA (2007a) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events. EFSA J 512: 1-5. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/512. pdf.
34. EFSA (2007b) EFSA review of statistical analyses conducted for the assessment of the MON 863 90-day rat feeding study. Statistical report. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/19r. pdf.
35. EFSA (2008a) Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants-challenges and approaches. EFSA Scientific Colloquium Series 8 (June 2007). http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/colloquiagmoera. pdf.
36. EFSA (2008b) Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol 46: S2-S70.
37. EFSA (2008c) Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Hungary on maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 756: 1-18. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/756. pdf.
38. EFSA (2008d) Request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Greece on maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 757: 1-12. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/757. pdf.
39. EFSA (2008e) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms related to a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by France on maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the emergency measure according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA J 850: 1-46. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/850. pdf.
40. EFSA (2008f) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission to review scientific studies related to the impact on the environment of the cultivation of maize Bt11 and 1507. EFSA J 851: 1-27. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/851. pdf.
41. EFSA (2008g) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on maize MON 810 and T25 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 891: 1-64. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/891. pdf.
42. EFSA (2009a) Statement of EFSA on the consolidated presentation of the joint Scientific Opinion of the GMO and BIOHAZ Panels on the "use of antibiotic resistance genes as marker genes in genetically modified plants" and the Scientific Opinion of the GMO Panel on "consequences of the opinion on the use of antibiotic resistance genes as marker genes in genetically modified plants on previous EFSA assessments of individual GM plants". EFSA J 1108: 1-8. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/cs/BlobServer/Statm_of_Efsa/gmo_biohaz_st_ej1108_ConsolidatedARG_en, 0. pdf.
43. EFSA (2009b) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on applications (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-22 and EFSA-GMO-RX-NK603) for the placing on the market of the genetically modified glyphosate tolerant maize NK603 for cultivation, food and feed uses and import and processing, and for renewal of the authorisation of maize NK603 as existing product. EFSA J 1137: 1-50. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1137. pdf.
44. EFSA (2009c) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on applications (EFSA-GMO-RX-MON810) for the renewal of authorisation for the continued marketing of (1) existing food and food ingredients produced from genetically modified insect resistant maize MON 810; (2) feed consisting of and/or containing maize MON 810, and maize MON 810 for feed use (including cultivation); and of (3) food additives and feed materials produced from maize MON 810, all under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. EFSA J 1149: 1-84. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1149. pdf.
45. EFSA (2009d) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on oilseed rape GT73 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 1151: 1-16. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1151. pdf.
46. EFSA (2009e) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause invoked by Austria on oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS8xRF3 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 1153: 1-16. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1153. pdf.
47. EFSA (2009f) Scientific Opinion on Guidance for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants used for non-food or non-feed purposes, on request of EFSA. EFSA J 1164: 1-42. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1164. pdf.
48. EFSA (2010a) Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs. EFSA J 8(1): 1-59 [1250]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1250. pdf.
49. EFSA (2010b) Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed. EFSA J 8(7): 1-168 [1700]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1700. pdf.
50. EFSA (2010c) Scientific Opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of GM plants on non-target organisms. EFSA J 8(11): 1-72 [1877]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1877. pdf.
51. EFSA (2010d) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of GM plants. EFSA J 8(11): 1-111 [1879]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1879. pdf.
52. EFSA (2011a) Guidance document on selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants. EFSA J 9(5): 1-20 [2149]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2149. pdf.
53. EFSA (2011b) Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from GM plants. EFSA J 9(5): 1-37 [2150]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2150. pdf.
54. EFSA (2011c) Scientific Opinion on guidance on the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their products intended for food and feed use. EFSA J 9(6): 1-54 [2193]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2193. pdf.
55. EFSA (2011d) EFSA guidance on the submission of applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed and genetically modified plants for food or feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA J 9(7): 1-27 [2311]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2311. pdf.
56. EFSA (2011e) Guidance on the post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 9(8): 1-40 [2316]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2316. pdf.
57. EFSA (2011f) Statistical significance and biological relevance. EFSA J 9(9): 1-17 [2372]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2372. pdf.
58. EFSA (2011g) Scientific Opinion on the annual Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) report from Monsanto Europe S. A. on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in 2009. EFSA J 9(10): 1-66 [2376]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2376. pdf.
59. EFSA (2011h) Scientific Opinion updating the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on insect resistant genetically modified maize 1507 for cultivation. EFSA J 9(12): 1-73 [2429]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2429. pdf.
60. EFSA (2011i) EFSA guidance on conducting repeated-dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents on whole food/feed. EFSA J 9(12): 1-21 [2438]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2438. pdf.
61. EFSA (2011j) Statement supplementing the evaluation of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations on insect resistant genetically modified maize Bt11 for cultivation. EFSA J 9(11): 1-44 [2478]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2478. pdf.
62. EFSA (2011k) Scientific Opinion on application (EFSAGMO-UK-2008-60) for placing on the market of genetically modified herbicide tolerant maize GA21 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Seeds. EFSA J 9(12): 1-94 [2480]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2480. pdf.
63. EFSA (2011l) Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-CZ-2008-54) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect resistant and herbicide tolerant maize MON 88017 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. EFSA J 9(11): 1-152 [2428]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2428. pdf.
64. EFSA (2012a) Guidance on the risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified animals and animal health and welfare aspects. EFSA J 10(1): 1-43 [2501]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2501. pdf.
65. EFSA (2012b) Scientific Opinion on the annual Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) report from BASF Plant Science Company GmbH on the cultivation of genetically modified potato EH92-527-1 in 2010. EFSA J 10(2): 1-38 [2558]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2558. pdf.
66. EFSA (2012c) Scientific Opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA J 10(2): 1-33 [2561]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2561. pdf.
67. EFSA (2012d) Scientific Opinion on the annual Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) report from Monsanto Europe S. A. on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in 2010. EFSA J 10(4): 1-35 [2610]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2610. pdf.
68. EFSA (2012e) Scientific Opinion on risk assessment terminology. EFSA J 10(5): 1-43 [2664]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2664. pdf.
69. EFSA (2012f) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the emergency measure notified by France on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA J 10(5): 1-21 [2705]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2705. pdf.
70. EFSA (2012g) Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40-3-2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto. EFSA J 10(6): 1-110 [2753]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2753. pdf.
71. EFSA (2012h) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission for the assessment of the scientific elements put forward by Luxembourg to support the prohibition for the placing on the market of GM potato EH92-527-1 for cultivation purposes in Luxembourg. EFSA J 10(9): 1-9 [2874]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2874. pdf.
72. EFSA (2012i) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape event GT73 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. EFSA J 10(9): 1-33 [2876]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2876. pdf.
73. EFSA (2012j) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the safeguard clause notified by Greece on genetically modified maize MON 810 according to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC. EFSA J 10(9): 1-20 [2877]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2877. pdf.
74. EFSA (2012k) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. EFSA J 10(9): 1-33 [2878]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2878. pdf.
75. EFSA (2012l) Review of the Séralini et al. (2012) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J 10(10): 1-9 [2910]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2910. pdf.
76. EFSA (2012m) Scientific Opinion updating the risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize 1507. EFSA J 10(10): 1-46 [2933]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2933. pdf.
77. EFSA (2012n) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed using Zinc Finger Nuclease 3 and other Site-Directed Nucleases with similar function. EFSA J 10(10): 1-31 [2943]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2943. pdf.
78. EFSA (2012o) Final review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J 10(11): 1-10 [2986]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2986. pdf.
79. EFSA (2012p) Scientific Opinion on the annual Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) report from BASF Plant Science Company GmbH on the cultivation of genetically modified potato EH92-527-1 in 2011. EFSA J 10(12): 1-35 [3015]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3015. pdf.
80. EFSA (2012q) Scientific Opinion supplementing the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment and risk management recommendations for the cultivation of the genetically modified insect resistant maize Bt11 and MON 810. EFSA J 10(12): 1-32 [3016]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3016. pdf.
81. EFSA (2012r) Scientific Opinion updating the risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize MON 810. EFSA J 10(12): 1-98 [3017]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3017. pdf.
82. EFSA (2012s) Scientific Opinion updating the risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize Bt11. EFSA J 10(12): 1-104 [3018]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3018. pdf.
83. EFSA (2012t) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission for the assessment of the scientific elements put forward by Hungary to support the prohibition for the placing on the market of GM potato EH92-527-1 for cultivation purposes in Hungary. EFSA J 10(12): 1-10 [3021]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3021. pdf.
84. EFSA (2012u) Workshop on key allergens and compositional analysis in the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants. Supporting Publications 2012: 289 [11 pp], EFSA. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/289e. pdf.
85. EFSA (2013a) Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-23) for placing on the market of genetically modified maize 59122 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer. EFSA J 11(3): 1-103 [3135]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3135. pdf.
86. EFSA (2013b) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals. EFSA J 11(5): 1-190 [3200]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3200. pdf.
87. EFSA (2013c) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape event GT73 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. EFSA J 11(4): 1-38 [3201]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3201. pdf.
88. EFSA (2013d) Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. EFSA J 11(4): 1-38 [3202]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3202. pdf.
89. Fernandez A, Mills ENC, Lovik M, Spök A, Germini A, Mikalsen A, Wal JM (2013) Endogenous allergens and compositional analysis in the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants. Food Chem Toxicol (in press).
90. Fladung M, Altosaar I, Bartsch D, Baucher M, Boscaleri F, Gallardo F, Häggman H, Hoenicka H, Nielsen KM, Paffetti D, Séguin A, Stotzky G, Vettori C (2012) European discussion forum on transgenic tree biosafety. Nat Biotechnol 30: 37-38.
91. FSANZ (2013) Response to Heinemann et al on the regulation of GM crops and foods developed using gene silencing. http://www. foodstandards. govt. nz/consumer/gmfood/Documents/Heinemann%20Response%20210513. pdf.
92. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF III (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol.
93. Georghiou SB, Magana M, Garfein RS, Catanzaro DG, Catanzaro A, Rodwell TC (2012) Evaluation of genetic mutations associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to amikacin, kanamycin and capreomycin: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 7: e33275.
94. Georgianna DR, Mayfield SP (2012) Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature 488: 329-335.
95. Goodman RE, Panda R, Ariyarathna H (2013) Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance. J Agric Food Chem. doi: 10. 1021/jf400952y.
96. Graef F, Römbke J, Binimelis R, Myhr AI, Hilbeck A, Breckling B, Dalgaard T, Stachow U, Catacora-Vargas G, Bøhn T, Quist D, Darvas B, Dudel G, Oehen B, Meyer H, Henle K, Wynne B, Metzger MJ, Knäbe S, Settele J, Székács A, Wurbs A, Bernard J, Murphy-Bokern D, Buiatti M, Giovannetti M, Debeljak M, Andersen E, Paetz A, Dzeroski S, Tappeser B, van Gestel CAM, Wosniok W, Séralini GE, Aslaksen I, Pesch R, Maly S, Werner A (2012) A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO). BioRisk 7: 73-97.
97. Gray A (2012) Problem formulation in environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: a practitioner's approach. Collect Biosaf Rev 6: 10-65.
98. Häggman H, Raybould A, Borem A, Fox T, Handley L, Hertzberg M, Lu M-Z, Macdonald P, Oguchi T, Pasquali G, Pearson L, Peter G, Quemada H, Séguin A, Tattersall K, Ulian E, Walter C, McLean M (2013) Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment. Plant Biotechnol J. doi: 10. 1111/pbi. 12100.
99. Heinemann JA, Agapito-Tengfen SZ, Carman J (2013) A comparative evaluation of the regulation of GM crops or products containing dsRNA and suggested improvements to risk assessments. Environ Intl 55: 43-55.
100. Henley WJ, Litaker RW, Novoveská L, Duke CS, Quemada HD, Sayre RT (2013) Initial risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) microalgae for commodity-scale biofuel cultivation. Algal Res 2: 66-77.
101. Henry H, Kerins G, Blackburn J, Stein J, Smith GC, Eyre D, Roy S, Parrott D, Hart A (2010) Defining environmental risk assessment criteria for genetically modified (GM) mammals and birds to be placed on the EU market. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-107 [187 pp], EFSA. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/107e. pdf.
102. Herman RA, Ekmay R (2013) Do whole-food animal feeding studies have any value in the safety assessment of GM crops? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. doi: 10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2013. 007. 003.
103. Herman RA, Price WD (2013) Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research. J Agric Food Chem. doi: 10. 1021/jf400135r.
104. Johnson R, Streicher EM, Louw GE, Warren RM, van Helden PD, Victor TC (2006) Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Iss Mol Biol 8: 97-111.
105. Johnson KL, Raybould A, Hudoson MD, Poppy GM (2007) How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? Trends Plant Sci 12: 1-5.
106. Keese P (2008) Risks from GMOs due to horizontal gene transfer. Environ Biosaf Res 7: 123-149.
107. Kuiper H, Kok EJ, Davies HV (2013) New EU legislation for risk assessment of GM food: no scientific justification for mandatory animal feeding trials. Plant Biotechnol J. doi: 10. 1111/pbi. 12091.
108. Kuntz M, Davison J, Ricroch AE (2013) What the French ban of Bt MON810 maize means for science-based risk assessment. Nat Biotechnol 33: 498-500.
109. Lheureux K, Mestdagh S, Devos Y (2008) Collaboration between the EFSA GMO Panel and national EU competent authorities for the environmental risk assessment of GM crop cultivation applications. J Consum Prot Food Saf 3(2): 51.
110. Liu Y, Christodoulidou A, Fernandes Dumont A, Germini A, Paoletti C (2013) Guidance Documents for nutritional and safety assessment of feeds from GM plants. In: Flachowsky G (ed) Animal nutrition with transgenic plants, CABI Biotechnology Series (in press).
111. Lundgren JG, Duan JJ (2013) RNAi-based insecticidal crops: potential effects on nontarget species. Bioscience. doi: 10. 1525/bio. 2013. 63. 8. 8.
112. Lusser M, Parisi C, Plan D, Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2012) Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nat Biotechnol 30: 231-239.
113. Meissle M, Álvarez-Alfageme F, Malone LA, Romeis J (2012) Establishing a database of bio-ecological information on non-target arthropod species to support the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in the EU. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-334 [170 pp], EFSA. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/supporting/doc/334e. pdf.
114. Meyer H (2011) Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment. Environ Sci Eur 23: 7.
115. Nielsen KM, Bones AM, Smalla K, van Elsas JD (1998) Horizontal gene transfer from plants to terrestrial bacteria-a rare event? FEMS Microbiol Rev 22: 79-103.
116. Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, van Wensum J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp SK, Brown C, Capri E, Forbes V, Köpp H, Liess M, Luttik R, Maltby L, Sousa JP, Streissl F, Hardy AR (2012) Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Tot Environ 415: 31-38.
117. Oke KB, Westley PAH, Moreau DTR, Fleming IA (2013) Hybridization between genetically modified Atlantic salmon and wild brown trout reveals novel ecological interactions. Proc R Soc B. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2013. 1047.
118. Panda R, Ariyarathna H, Amnuaycheewa P, Tetteh A, Pramod SN, Taylor SL, Ballmer-Weber BK, Goodman RE (2013) Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety. Allergy 68: 142-151.
119. Paoletti C, Flamm E, Yan W, Meek S, Renckens S, Fellous M, Kuiper H (2008) GMO risk assessment around the world: some examples. Trends Food Sci Technol 19: S66-S74.
120. Parrott W, Chassy B, Ligon J, Meyer L, Petrick J, Zhou J, Herman R, Delaney B, Levine M (2010) Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops. Food Chem Toxicol 48: 1773-1790.
121. Perry JN, ter Braak CJF, Dixon PM, Duan JJ, Hails RS, Huesken A, Lavielle A, Marvier M, Scardi M, Schmidt K, Tothmeresz B, Schaarschmidt F, van der Voet H (2009) Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms. Environ Biosaf Res 8: 65-78.
122. Perry JN, Devos Y, Arpaia S, Bartsch D, Gathmann A, Hails RS, Kiss J, Lheureux K, Manachini B, Mestdagh S, Neemann G, Ortego F, Schiemann J, Sweet JB (2010) A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe. P Roy Soc B 277: 1417-1425.
123. Perry JN, Devos Y, Arpaia S, Bartsch D, Gathmann A, Hails RS, Kiss J, Lheureux K, Manachini B, Mestdagh S, Neemann G, Ortego F, Schiemann J, Sweet JB (2011) The usefulness of a mathematical model of exposure for environmental risk assessment. P Roy Soc B 278: 982-984.
124. Perry JN, Devos Y, Arpaia S, Bartsch B, Ehlert C, Gathmann A, Hails RS, Hendriksen NB, Kiss J, Messéan A, Mestdagh S, Neemann G, Nuti M, Sweet JB, Tebbe CC (2012) Estimating the effects of Cry1F Bt-maize pollen on non-target Lepidoptera using a mathematical model of exposure. J Appl Ecol 49: 29-37.
125. Perry JN, Arpaia S, Bartsch D, Birch ANE, Devos Y, Gathmann A, Gennaro A, Kiss J, Messéan A, Mestdagh S, Nuti M, Sweet JB, Tebbe CC (2013) No evidence requiring change in the risk assessment of Inachis io larvae. Ecol Model (in press).
126. Petrick JS, Brower-Toland B, Jackson AL, Kier LD (2013) Safety assessment of food and feed from biotechnology-derived crops employing RNA-mediated gene regulation to achieve desired traits: a scientific review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 66: 167-176.
127. Podevin N, Devos Y, Davies HV, Nielsen KM (2012) Transgenic or not? No simple answer!-new biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape. EMBO Rep 13: 1057-1061.
128. Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, Nogué F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol 31: 375-383.
129. Qin S, Lin H, Jiang P (2012) Advances in genetic engineering of marine algae. Biotechnol Adv 30: 1602-1613.
130. Ramessar K, Peremarti A, Gómez-Galera S, Naqvi S, Moralejo M, Muñoz M, Capell T, Christou P (2007) Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants. A case of the science not supporting the politics. Transgenic Res 16: 261-280.
131. Rangasamy M, Siegfried BD (2011) Validation of RNA interference in western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adults. Pest Manag Sci 68: 587-591.
132. Raybould A (2006) Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ Biosaf Res 5: 119-125.
133. Raybould A (2012) Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops? Transgenic Res 21: 691-698.
134. Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens M, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD (2008) Nontarget arthropod risk assessment of insect-resistant GM crops. Nat Biotechnol 26: 203-208.
135. Rüdelsheim PLJ, Smets G (2010) Anticipating the environmental risk assessment of crops modified to enhance or preserve yield. COGEM report CGM 2010-05. http://www. cogem. net/index. cfm/nl/publicaties/publicatie/anticipating-the-environmental-risk-assessment-of-crops-modified-to-enhance-or-preserve-yield.
136. Sabalza M, Miralpeix B, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P (2011) EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones. Nat Biotechnol 29: 315-317.
137. Sanvido O, Widmer F, Winzeler M, Bigler F (2005) A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environ Biosaf Res 4: 13-27.
138. Sanvido O, Romeis J, Bigler F (2011) Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops. Transgenic Res 20: 1191-2101.
139. Sanvido O, Romeis J, Gathmann A, Gielkens M, Raybould A, Bigler F (2012) Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making. Environ Sci Pol 15: 82-91.
140. Séralini GE, Cellier D, de Vendomois JS (2007) New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52: 596-602.
141. Séralini GE, Mesnage R, Clair E, Gress S, de Vendômois J, Cellier D (2011) Genetically modified crops safety assessments: present limits and possible improvements. Environ Sci Eur 23: 10.
142. Séralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, Gress S, Defarge N, Malatesta M, Hennequin D, de Vendômois JS (2012a) Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol 50: 4221-4231.
143. Séralini GE, Mesnage R, Defarge N, Gress S, Hennequin D, Clair E, Malatesta M, de Vendômois JS (2012b) Answers to critics: why there is a long term toxicity due to NK603 Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide. Food Chem Toxicol 53: 476-483.
144. Snow AA, Smith VH (2012) Genetically engineered algae for biofuels: a key role for Ecologists. Bioscience 62: 765-768.
145. Stephenson PG, Moore CM, Terry MJ, Zubkov MV, Bibby TS (2011) Improving photosynthesis for algal biofuels: toward a green revolution. Trends Biotechnol 29: 615-623.
146. van der Voet H, Perry JN, Amzal B, Paoletti C (2011) A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties. BMC Biotechnol 11: 15.
147. van Eenennaam AL, Muir WM (2011) Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the grocery shelf? Nat Biotechnol 29: 706-710.
148. Waigmann E, Paoletti C, Davies H, Perry J, Kärenlampi S, Kuiper H (2012) Risk assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). EFSA J 10(10): 1-7 [s1008]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/en/efsajournal/doc/as1008. pdf.
149. Walter C, Fladung M, Boerjan W (2010) The 20-year environmental safety record of GM trees. Nat Biotechnol 28: 656-658.
150. Ward KJ, Nemeth MA, Brownie C, Hong B, Herman RA, Oberdoerfer R (2012) Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011. BMC Biotechnol 12: 13.
151. Wilkinson M, Tepfer M (2009) Fitness and beyond: preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ Biosaf Res 8: 1-14.
152. Wolt JD, Keese P, Raybould A, Fitzpatrick JW, Burachik M, Gray A, Olin SS, Schiemann J, Sears M, Wu F (2010) Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res 19: 425-436.
153. Ye VM, Bhatia SK (2012) Pathway engineering strategies for production of beneficial carotenoids in microbial hosts. Biotechnol Lett 34: 1405-1414.
154. Zaunbrecher MA, Sikes RD Jr, Metchock B, Shinnick TM, Posey JE (2009) Overexpression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferase eis confers kanamycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 20004-20009.
155. Zhu C, Sanahuja G, Yuan D, Farré G, Arjó G, Berman J, Zorrilla-López U, Banakar R, Bai C, Pérez-Massot E, Bassie L, Capell T, Christou P (2013) Biofortification of plants with altered antioxidant content and composition: genetic engineering strategies. Plant Biotechnol J 11: 129-141.