Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: Ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 82-91

  Sanvido, Olivier ^a   Romeis, Jörg ^a   Gathmann, Achim ^b   Gielkens, Marco ^c   Raybould, Alan ^d   Bigler, Franz ^a  

^a AGROSCOPE RECKENHOLZ TÄNIKON RESEARCH STATION ART   (Switzerland)

^b Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL)   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment endpoints; Biodiversity; Bt crops; Environmental harm; GM crops; Measurement endpoints; Problem formulation; Protection goals; Regulatory decision making; Transgenic crops

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CROP; DECISION MAKING; DNA MODIFICATION; ECOLOGICAL GENETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; LEGAL ABORTION; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 83255193982     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ACRE Managing the Footprint of Agriculture: Towards a Comparative Assessment of Risks and Benefits for Novel Agricultural Systems 2007, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs - Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment, London, p. 97.
2. Bartz R., Heink U., Kowarik I. Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species. Conservation Biology 2010, 24:675-681.
3. CBD MOP 4 Decision BS-IV/12 Liability and redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety 2009, Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, p. 24.
4. Devos Y., Maeseele P., Reheul D., van Speybroeck L., De Waele D. Ethics in the societal debate on genetically modified organisms: a (re)quest for sense and sensibility. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 2008, 21:29-61.
5. Duelli P., Obrist M.K. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2003, 98:87-98.
6. EASAC Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in Europe 2009, European Academies Science Advisory Council, London, UK, p. 70.
7. EFSA Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants - Challenges and Approaches, EFSA Scientific Colloquium Series 8 2008, European Food Safety Authority, Parma, p. 161.
8. EFSA Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2010, 8:1879.
9. EFSA Scientific opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms. EFSA Journal 2010, 8:1877.
10. EFSA Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for the environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA Journal 2010, 8:1821.
11. EPA Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment 1998, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p. 80.
12. Ernst G., Emmerling C. Impact of five different tillage systems on soil organic carbon content and the density, biomass, and community composition of earthworms after a ten year period. European Journal of Soil Biology 2009, 45:247-251.
13. European Commission Council Directive 92/42/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora 1992, Commission of the European Communitites, Brussels, p. 66.
14. European Commission Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade Therein 1997, European Council, Brussels, p. 69.
15. European Commission Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on Environmental Liability with Regard to the Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage 2004, European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Strassburg, p. 19.
16. European Community Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC 2001, European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Brussels, p. 38.
17. European Council Council decision of 3 October 2002 Establishing Guidance Notes Supplementing Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC 2002, The Council of the European Union, Luxemburg, p. 10.
18. Ferreira E.P.D., dos Santos H.P., Costa J.R., De-Polli H., Rumjanek N.G. Microbial soil quality indicators under different crop rotations and tillage management. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 2010, 41:177-183.
19. Hails R.S. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Nature 2002, 418:685-688.
20. Heard M.S., Rothery P., Perry J.N., Firbank L.G. Predicting longer-term changes in weed populations under GMHT crop management. Weed Research 2005, 45:331-338.
21. Humbert J.Y., Ghazoul J., Richner N., Walter T. Hay harvesting causes high orthopteran mortality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2010, 139:522-527.
22. Humbert J.Y., Ghazoul J., Walter T. Meadow harvesting techniques and their impacts on field fauna. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2009, 130:1-8.
23. Jaffe G. Regulating transgenic crops: a comparative analysis of different regulatory processes. Transgenic Research 2004, 13:5-19.
24. Knacker T., Forster B., Römbke J., Frampton G.K. Assessing the effects of plant protection products on organic matter breakdown in arable fields-litter decomposition test systems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2003, 35:1269-1287.
25. Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 1998, 279:491-497.
26. Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J.W., Squire G.R., Ward L.K. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research 2003, 43:77-89.
27. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 137.
28. Moonen A.C., Barberi P. Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 127:7-21.
29. NHG, SR 451. Bundesgesetz über den Natur- und Heimatschutz. Systematische Sammlung des Bundesrechts, Bern, p. 24.
30. Nickson T.E. Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops. Plant Physiology 2008, 147:494-502.
31. Perry J.N., Ter Braak C.J.F., Dixon P.M., Duan J.J., Hails R., Huesken A., Lavielle M., Marvier M., Scardi M., Schmidt K., Tothmeresz B., Schaarschmidt F., van der Voet H. Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms. Environmental Biosafety Research 2009, 8:65-78.
32. Pielke R.A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Raybould A. Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Environmental Biosafety Research 2006, 5:119-125.
34. Raybould A. Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Science 2007, 173:589-602.
35. Raybould A. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops: general principles and risks to non-target organisms. BioAssay 2007, 2:8.
36. Raybould A. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops. Environmental Biosafety Research 2011, 9:123-133.
37. Reid W.V., Mc Neely J.A., Tunstall D.B., Bryant D.A., Winograd M. Biodiversity Indicators for Policy-Makers 1993, World Resources Institute, New York, p. 42.
38. Römbke J. Tools and techniques for the assessment of ecotoxicological impacts of contaminants in the terrestrial environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2006, 12:84-101.
39. Romeis J., Bartsch D., Bigler F., Candolfi M.P., Gielkens M., Hartley S.E., Hellmich R.L., Huesing J.E., Jepson P.C., Layton R., Quemada H., Raybould A., Rose R.I., Schiemann J., Sears M.K., Shelton A.M., Sweet J., Vaituzis Z., Wolt J.D. Nontarget arthropod risk assessment of insect-resistant GM crops. Nature Biotechnology 2008, 26:203-208.
40. Romeis J., Hellmich R.L., Candolfi M.P., Carstens K., De Schrijver A., Gatehouse A.M.R., Herman R.A., Huesing J.E., McLean M.A., Raybould A., Shelton A.M., Waggoner A. Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. Transgenic Research 2011, 20:1-22.
41. Sandford S. Better Livestock Policies for Africa 1985, International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Abeba, Ethiopia, p. 22.
42. Sanvido O., Romeis J., Bigler F. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation. Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology 2007, 107:235-278.
43. Sanvido O., Romeis J., Bigler F. An approach for post-market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt-maize expressing Cry1ab on natural enemies. Journal of Applied Entomology 2009, 133:236-248.
44. Sanvido O., Romeis J., Bigler F. Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops. Transgenic Research 2011, 10.1007/s11248-011-9524-8.
45. Sanvido O., Widmer F., Winzeler M., Bigler F. A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environmental Biosafety Research 2005, 4:13-27.
46. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 2004, 7:385-403.
47. SRU Environmental Report 2004: Ensuring Environmental Protection Capacity 2004, German Advisory Council on the Environment, p. 115.
48. Storkey J., Bohan D.A., Haughton A.J., Champion G.T., Perry J.N., Poppy G.M., Woiwod I.P. Providing the evidence base for environmental risk assessments of novel farm management practices. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:579-587.
49. Suter G.W. Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:173-178.
50. VGVL, SR 817.022.51. Verordnung des EDI über gentechnisch veränderte Lebensmittel. Systematische Sammlung des Bundesrechts, Bern, p. 12.
51. Waltz E. Battlefield. Nature 2009, 461:27-32.
52. Watkinson A.R., Freckleton R.P., Robinson R.A., Sutherland W.J. Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science 2000, 289:1554-1557.
53. Wolt J.D., Keese P., Raybould A., Fitzpatrick J.W., Burachik M., Gray A., Olin S.S., Schiemann J., Sears M., Wu F. Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Research 2010, 19:425-436.
54. Zurbrügg C., Hönemann L., Meissle M., Romeis J., Nentwig W. Decomposition dynamics and structural plant components of genetically modified Bt maize leaves do not differ from leaves of conventional hybrids. Transgenic Research 2010, 19:257-267.