메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

biological relevance; Statistical significance

Indexed keywords


EID: 85053203545     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2372     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (95)

References (19)
  • 1
    • 1442323587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence (Editorial)
    • Alderson P, 2004. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence (Editorial). British Medical Journal, 328, 476–477.
    • (2004) British Medical Journal , vol.328 , pp. 476-477
    • Alderson, P.1
  • 3
    • 84971580244 scopus 로고
    • Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
    • &
    • Altman DG & Bland JM, 1995. Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. British Medical Journal, 311, 485.
    • (1995) British Medical Journal , vol.311 , pp. 485
    • Altman, D.G.1    Bland, J.M.2
  • 4
    • 0025805329 scopus 로고
    • Multiple testing in clinical trials
    • Bauer P, 1991. Multiple testing in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 10(6), 871–890.
    • (1991) Statistics in Medicine , vol.10 , Issue.6 , pp. 871-890
    • Bauer, P.1
  • 5
    • 0039484817 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Confessions of a Pragmatic Statistician
    • Chatfield C, 2002. Confessions of a Pragmatic Statistician. The Statistician, 51, 1–20.
    • (2002) The Statistician , vol.51 , pp. 1-20
    • Chatfield, C.1
  • 7
    • 77149171287 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment
    • EFSA, 2009a. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA Journal 2009, 1150, 1–72.
    • (2009) EFSA Journal 2009 , vol.1150 , pp. 1-72
  • 8
    • 84979490490 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific opinion on Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs
    • EFSA, 2009b. Scientific opinion on Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs. EFSA Journal 2010, 8(1), 1250.
    • (2009) EFSA Journal 2010 , vol.8 , Issue.1 , pp. 1250
  • 9
    • 0023049334 scopus 로고
    • Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing
    • &
    • Gardner MJ & Altman DG, 1986. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746–750.
    • (1986) British Medical Journal , vol.292 , pp. 746-750
    • Gardner, M.J.1    Altman, D.G.2
  • 10
    • 0023714168 scopus 로고
    • On the meaning of clinical significance
    • Hollon SD, Flick SN, 1988. On the meaning of clinical significance. Behavioural Assessment, 10(2), 197–206.
    • (1988) Behavioural Assessment , vol.10 , Issue.2 , pp. 197-206
    • Hollon, S.D.1    Flick, S.N.2
  • 11
    • 0036584504 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The clinical significance of local chemotherapies
    • Issue Supplement
    • Killoy WJ, 2002. The clinical significance of local chemotherapies. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29, Issue Supplement s2, 6–13.
    • (2002) Journal of Clinical Periodontology , vol.29 , Issue.s2 , pp. 6-13
    • Killoy, W.J.1
  • 12
    • 84979290098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistics for toxicology
    • Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    • Lee PN, Lovell D, 2009. Statistics for toxicology; General and Applied Toxicology, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    • (2009) General and Applied Toxicology
    • Lee, P.N.1    Lovell, D.2
  • 13
    • 0027570579 scopus 로고
    • The Statistical versus Clinical Significance Debate
    • LeFort SM, 1993. The Statistical versus Clinical Significance Debate. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 57–62.
    • (1993) Journal of Nursing Scholarship , vol.25 , pp. 57-62
    • LeFort, S.M.1
  • 15
    • 0024892145 scopus 로고
    • Statistical significance versus clinical relevance; part 1; the essential role of the power of a statistical test
    • Luus HG, Muller FO, Meyer BH, 1989. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance; part 1; the essential role of the power of a statistical test. South African Medical Journal, 78, 568–70.
    • (1989) South African Medical Journal , vol.78 , pp. 568-570
    • Luus, H.G.1    Muller, F.O.2    Meyer, B.H.3
  • 17
    • 85078376801 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: Revised and new guidelines adopted 2007. Reese RA, 2004. Does significance matter?
    • OECD, 2007. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: Revised and new guidelines adopted 2007. Reese RA, 2004. Does significance matter? Significance, 1(1) 39–40.
    • (2007) Significance , vol.1 , Issue.1 , pp. 39-40
  • 18
    • 0023615056 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability
    • Shuirmann DJ, 1987. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15(6), 657–680.
    • (1987) Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics , vol.15 , Issue.6 , pp. 657-680
    • Shuirmann, D.J.1
  • 19
    • 0035956651 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?
    • Sterne JA, Davey Smith G, 2001. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? British Medical Journal, 322, 226–231
    • (2001) British Medical Journal , vol.322 , pp. 226-231
    • Sterne, J.A.1    Davey Smith, G.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.