Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: The need for new approaches to risk assessment

Environmental Sciences Europe

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Meyer, Hartmut ^a  

^a Vereinigung Deutscher Wissenschaftler   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOHAZARDS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; EXPERT CONSULTATION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS; NEW APPROACHES; RISKS ASSESSMENTS; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS; SYSTEMIC RISKS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79958232056     PISSN: 21904707     EISSN: 21904715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2190-4715-23-7     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. James C: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2009. ISAAA Brief No. 41 Ithaca: International Service for the Acquisition of Agro-biotech Applications; 2010.
2. FoEI: Who benefits from GM crops? Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International; 2010.
3. Flowers TJ: Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 2004, 55:307-319. (Pubitemid 38204113)
4. Vinocur B, Altman A: Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 2005:123-132.
5. Visarada KBRS, Meena K, Aruna C, Srujana S, Saikishore N, Seetharama N: Transgenic breeding: perspectives and prospects. Crop Sci 2009, 49:1555-1563.
6. Dymond M, Hurr K: The global status of commercialised genetically modified plants 1 July 2008-31 December 2009 Wellington: MAF Biosecurity New Zealand; 2010.
7. Islam A: Fungus resistant transgenic plants: strategies, progress and lessons learnt. Plant Tissue Cult Biotech 2006, 16:117-138.
8. Stuiver M: Engineering fungal resistance in crops. In Plant biotechnology: current and future applications of genetically modified crops. Edited by: Halford N. New York: John Wiley 2006:225-239.
9. Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E: The global pipeline of new GM crops: implications of asynchronous approval for international trade. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technology Studies, Sevilla; 2009.
10. Rodgers J: Asilomar revisited. Mosaic 1981, 19-25.
11. Singer M, Soll D: Guidelines for DNA hybrid molecules. Science 1973, 181:1114.
12. Berg P, Baltimore D, Nathans D, Boyer HW, Roblin R, Cohen SN, Watson JD, Davis RW, Weissman S, Hogness DS, Zinder ND: Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1974, 71:2593-2594.
13. Herbig J: Die Gen-Ingenieure München and Wien: Hanser; 1978.
14. Cohen SN: Recombinant DNA: fact and fiction. Science 1977, 195:654-657. (Pubitemid 8055709)
15. Watson JD: An imaginary monster. Bull At Sci 1977, 33:19-20.
16. Watson JD: Remarks on recombinant DNA. CoEvol Quart Summer 1977, 40-41.
17. Cohen SN: The manipulation of genes. Sci Am 1975, 233:25-32.
18. Wright S: Molecular politics. Developing American and British regulatory policy for genetic engineering, 1972-1982 Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1994.
19. NRC: Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1983.
20. Suter GW: Ecological risk assessment Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1993.
21. Commandeur P, Joly PB, Levidow L, Tappeser B, Terragni F: Public debate and regulation of biotechnology in Europe. Biotech Dev Monit 1996, 26:2-9. (Pubitemid 126488553)
22. Meyer H: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Biotech Dev Monit 2000, 43:2-7.
23. Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F: Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entymol 1998, 27:480-487. (Pubitemid 128485667)
24. Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F: Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entymol 1998, 27:1255-1263. (Pubitemid 128482924)
25. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME: Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 1999, 399:214. (Pubitemid 29246442)
26. EPA: Bt cotton confirmatory data and terms and conditions of the amendment Washington, DC: EPA; 2001.
27. Obrycki J, Losey JE, Taylor OR, Jesse LCH: Transgenic insecticidal corn: beyond insecticidal toxicity to ecological complexity. BioScience 2001, 51:353-361.
28. Raybould A: Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Sci 2007, 173:589-602. (Pubitemid 47562597)
29. EFSA: Scientific opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms. EFSA J 2010.
30. Andow DA, Birch ANE, Dusi AN, Fontes EMG, Hilbeck A, Lang A, Lövei GL, Pires CSS, Sujii ER, Underwood E, Wheatley RE: Non-target and biodiversity risk assessment for genetically modified (GM) crops. Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms: September 2006; Korea 2006, 68-73.
31. Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens MMC, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD: Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nature Biotechnol 2008, 26:203-208. (Pubitemid 351225956)
32. Hilbeck A, Meier MS, Raps A: Review on non-target organisms and Bt plants. Report prepared for Greenpeace International, Amsterdam Zurich: EcoStrat GmbH, Ecological Technology Assessment & Environmental Consulting; 2000.
33. Jänsch S, Amorim MJ, Römbke J: Identification of the ecological requirements of important terrestrial ecotoxicological test species. Environ Rev 2005, 13:51-83. (Pubitemid 40930345)
34. Levidow L, Carr S, Wiel D: Genetically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities. J Risk Res 2000, 3:189-208.
35. Devos Y, Reheul D, Dewaele D, van Speybroeck L: The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union. Environ Biosaf Res 2006, 5:127-149. (Pubitemid 46846029)
36. Hill RA, Sendashonga C: General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environ Biosaf Res 2003, 2:81-88.
37. Hill RA: Conceptualizing risk assessment methodology for genetically modified organisms. Environ Biosaf Res 2005, 4:67-70.
38. Snow A, Moran-Palma P: Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience 1997, 47:86-96.
39. Andow DA, Zwahlen C: Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol Lett 2006, 9:196-214.
40. Römbke J, Jänsch S, Meier M, Hilbeck A, Teichmann H, Tappeser B: General recommendations for soil ecotoxicological tests suitable for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2009, 6:287-300.
41. Andow DA, Hilbeck A: Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. BioScience 2004, 54:637-649. (Pubitemid 38940961)
42. Snow AA, Andow DA, Gepts P, Hallerman EM, Power A, Tiedje JM: Genetically modified organisms and the environment: current status and recommendations. Ecol Appl 2005, 15:377-404. (Pubitemid 40441286)
43. Marvier M, McCreedy MC, Regetz J, Kaveira P: A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 2007, 316:1475-1477. (Pubitemid 46906613)
44. Garcia-Alonso M, Jakobs E, Raybould A, Nickson TE, Sowig P, Willekens H, van der Kouwe P, Layton R, Amijee F, Fuentes AM: A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms. Environ Biosaf Res 2006, 5:57-65. (Pubitemid 46594583)
45. Nickson TE: Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:494-502.
46. EFSA: Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 2010.
47. Nelson KC, Banker MJ: Problem formulation and options assessment handbook St. Paul: University of Minnesota; 2007.
48. Hilbeck A, Andow DA: Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 1: a case study of Bt maize in Kenya Wallingford: Cabi Publishing; 2004.
49. Hilbeck A, Andow DA, Fontes EMG: Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, Volume 2: methodologies for assessing Bt cotton in Brazil Wallingford: Cabi Publishing; 2006.
50. Andow DA, Hilbeck A, Nguyen VT: Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 4: challenges and opportunities with Bt cotton in Vietnam Wallingford: Cabi Publishing; 2008.
51. OECD: Emerging risks in the 21st century-an agenda for action. Paris 2003.
52. Raybould A: Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ Biosaf Res 2006, 5:119-125. (Pubitemid 46846028)
53. Gibbons M: Science's new social contract with society. Nature 1999, 402 (Suppl 6761): C81-C84.
54. Kvakkestad V, Gillund F, Kjølberg KA, Vatn A: Scientists' perspectives on the deliberate release of GM crops. Environ Values 2007, 16:79-104. (Pubitemid 46344487)
55. Greef W: The Cartagena Protocol and the future of agbiotech. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:811-812. (Pubitemid 38886594)
56. Millstone E, van Zwanenberg P, Marris C, Levidow L, Torgersen H: Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. European Commission; 2004.
57. Meyer H: The precautionary principle and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: development of a concept. In Biosafety first-holistic approaches to risk and uncertainty in genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms. Edited by: Traavik T, Li Ching L. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press; 2007:469-482.
58. Slovic P: The risk game. J Hazard Mater 2001, 89:17-24. (Pubitemid 32816262)
59. Wynne B: Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci Cult 2001, 10:445-481.
60. Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U. S. EPA: Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC 2009.
61. IRGC: An introduction to the IRGC risk governance framework. Geneva 2008.
62. Helbing D: Systemic risks in society and economics. Working Paper 09-12-044 Santa Fe Institute; 2009.
63. Briggs DJ: A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks. Environ Health 2008, 7:61-78.
64. McMichael A: Environmental change, climate and population health: a challenge for inter-disciplinary research. Environ Health Prev Med 2008, 13:183-186.
65. Breckling B, Laue H, Pehlke H: Remote sensing as a data source to analyse regional implications of genetically modified plants in agriculture-Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in Northern Germany. Ecol Indicat 2009.
66. Breckling B, Reuter H, Middelhoff U, Glemnitz M, Wurbs A, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Windhorst W: Risk indication of genetically modified organisms (GMO): modelling environmental exposure and dispersal across different scales. Ecol Indicat 2009
67. Schmidt G, Schröder W: Regionalisation of climate variability used for modelling the dispersal of genetically modified oil seed rape in Northern Germany. Ecol Indicat 2009
68. Glemnitz M, Wurbs A, Roth R: Derivation of regional crop sequences as an indicator for potential GMO dispersal on large spatial scales. Ecol Indicat 2009.
69. Middelhoff U, Reiche EW, Windhorst W: An integrative methodology to predict dispersal of genetically modified genotypes in oilseed rape at landscape-level-a study for the region of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Ecol Indicat 2009.
70. Reuter H, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Middelhoff U, Pehlke H, Breckling B: Regional distribution of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)-upscaling the dispersal and persistence potential of herbicide resistant oilseed rape (Brassisca napus). Ecol Indicat 2009
71. Middelhoff U, Reuter H, Breckling B: GeneTraMP, a spatio-temporal model of the dispersal and persistence of transgenes in feral, volunteer and crop plants of oilseed rape and related species. Ecol Indicat 2009.
72. Otsuka Y: Socioeconomic considerations relevant to the sustainable development, use and control of genetically modified foods. Food Sci Tech 2003, 14:294-318. (Pubitemid 36774652)
73. Gupta A: Framing"biosafety" in an international context: the biosafety protocol negotiations Cambridge: Harvard University; 1999.
74. Falck-Zepeda JB: Socio-economic considerations, Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: what are the issues and what is at stake? AgBioForum 2009, 12(1):90-107.
75. Brush S, Chauvet M: Assessment of social and cultural effects associated with transgenic maize production Quebec: Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation; 2004.
76. CEC: Maize and biodiversity The effects of transgenic maize in Mexico-key findings and recommendations. Quebec 2004.
77. European Commission: New policy for genetically modified organisms (GMO) cultivation Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
78. Anonymous: EU GMO proposals draw widespread criticism. Brussels: EurActiv Network; 2010.
79. Chipman A: Fears over Europe's GM crop plan. Nature 2010, 466:542-543
80. COGEM: Socio-economic aspects of GMOs. Building blocks for an EU sustainability assessment of genetically modified crops. Bilthoven 2009.
81. Therivel R, Wilson E, Thompson S, Heaney D, Pritchard D: Strategic environmental assessment London: Earthscan Publishers; 1992.
82. Buckley R: Strategic environmental assessment of policies and plans: legislation and implementation. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2000, 18:209-215.
83. Goodland R: Strategic environmental assessment and the World Bank Group. Internat J Sustain Dev World Ecol 2005, 12:1-11
84. CBD: Decision VI/7. Identification, monitoring, indicators and assessments. Guidelines for incorporating biodiversity related issues into environmentalimpact-assessment legislation or processes and in strategic impact assessment. Montreal 2004.
85. CBD: CBD Technical Series No. 26-biodiversity in impact assessment. Background document to CBD Decision VIII/28: voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact assessment. Montreal 2006.
86. OECD: Applying strategic environmental assessment. Good Practice guidance for development cooperation. Paris 2006.
87. OECD: Strategic environmental assessment and ecosystem services. Paris 2008.
88. Chaker A, El-Fad K, Chamas L, Hatjian B: A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2006, 26:15-56. (Pubitemid 41827466)
89. Stoeglehner G, Brown AL, Kørnøv LB: SEA and planning: 'ownership' of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2009, 27:111-120.
90. Gnansounou E: Assessing the sustainability of biofuels: a logic-based model. Energy 2010.
91. Jay S: Strategic environmental assessment for energy production. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3489-3497.
92. Ming-Lone L, Yue-Hwa Y: Development and implementation of strategic environmental assessment in Taiwan. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2004, 24:337-350.
93. Linacre NA, Gaskell J, Rosegrant MW, Falck-Zepeda J, Quemada H, Halsey M, Birner R: Strategic environmental assessments for genetically modified organisms. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2006, 24:35-43.
94. Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B: Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach Nairobi: UN Environmental Program; 2004.