A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems - A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 124, Issue , 2014, Pages 142-157

  Montewka, Jakub ^a   Ehlers, Sören ^b   Goerlandt, Floris ^a   Hinz, Tomasz ^c   Tabri, Kristjan ^d   Kujala, Pentti ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c Waterborne Transport Innovation   (Poland)

^d TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Bayesian Belief Networks; F N diagram; Maritime transportation; Risk analysis; RoPax safety; Ship ship collision

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION; SHIPS; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; FORMAL DEFINITION; GULF OF FINLAND; MARITIME ACCIDENTS; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; PRO-ACTIVE APPROACH; SHIP COLLISION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84891712735     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Mains C. Updated damage statistics on collision and grounding. Report 1-11-D-2001-01-1, Germanisher Lloyd, 2001.
2. A. Papanikolaou, and E. Eliopoulou On the development of the new harmonised damage stability regulations for dry cargo and passenger ships Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 2008 1305 1316 (Pubitemid 351522448)
3. D. Konovessis, and D. Vassalos Risk evaluation for RoPax vessels Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Maritime Environ 222 2008 13 26 (Pubitemid 351357897)
4. Mermiris G, Konovessis D, Vassalos D. First-principles collision risk analysis of a RoPax vessel. In: Proceedings of 4th international ASRANet colloquium, 2008.
5. L. Guarin, D. Konovessis, and D. Vassalos Safety level of damaged RoPax ships risk modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis Ocean Eng 36 2009 941 951
6. Papanikolaou A, Mains C, Rusås S, Szalek R, Tsakalakis N, Vassalos D, et al. Goalds - goal based damage stability. In: Proceedings of the 11th international ship stability workshop. Wageningen: MARIN; 2010. p. 46-57.
7. D. Konovesis, and D. Vassalos Risk-based design for damage survivability of passenger ro-ro vessels Int Shipbuild Prog 54 2007 129 144 (Pubitemid 47552062)
8. A.E. Papanikolaou Risk-based ship design methods, tools and applications 2009 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
9. T.A. Santos, and C. Guedes Soares Numerical assessment of factors affecting the survivability of damaged ro-ro ships in waves Ocean Eng 36 2009 797 809
10. Spanos D, Papanikolaou A. On the time dependent survivability of RoPax ships. In: Proceedings of the 11th international ship stability workshop. Wageningen:MARIN; 2010. p. 143-7.
11. IMO. Guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1023; MEPC/Circ.392, 2002.
12. Vanem E, Puisa R, Skjong R. Standardized risk models for formal safety assessment of maritime transportation. In: ASME 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE 2009). 2009. p. 51-61.
13. S. Otto, P.T. Pedersen, M. Samuelides, and P.C. Sames Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a roro passenger ferry Mar Struct 15 2002 461 474 (Pubitemid 34792314)
14. Vanem E, Skjong R. Collision and grounding of passenger ships - risk assessment and emergency evacuations. In: Snaj, editor. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on collision and grounding of ships, 2004. p. 195-202.
15. L. Kobylinski Stability and safety of ships holistic and risk approach Reliab Risk Anal Theory Appl 1 2008 95 105
16. M. Gerigk A method of risk and safety assessment during the ship salvage using the hazard, release and consequence analysis J KONBiN 13 2010 165 176
17. P. Antao, and C. Guedes Soares Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels Int J Autom Comput 3 2006 107 116
18. D. Konovessis, D. Vassalos, and G. Mermiris Risk analysis for RoPax vessels WMU J Maritime Affairs 7 2008 109 131
19. M.R. Martins, and M.C. Maturana Application of Bayesian belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents Reliability Engineering & System Safety 110 2013 89 109
20. K. Groth, C. Wang, and A. Mosleh Hybrid causal methodology and software platform for probabilistic risk assessment and safety monitoring of socio-technical systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 2010 1276 1285
21. P. Trucco, E. Cagno, F. Ruggeri, and O. Grande A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis a case study in maritime transportation Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 2008 845 856 (Pubitemid 351305172)
22. J. Vinnem, R. Bye, B. Gran, T. Kongsvik, O. Nyheim, and E. Okstad et al. Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations J Loss Prev Process Ind 25 2012 274 292
23. B. Gran, R. Bye, O. Nyheim, E. Okstad, J. Seljelid, and S. Sklet et al. Evaluation of the risk OMT model for maintenance work on major offshore process equipment J Loss Prev Process Ind 25 2012 582 593
24. Leva, M. C., Friis-Hansen, P., Ravn, E. S., & Lepsoe, A. (2006). SAFEDOR: A practical approach to model the action of an officer of the watch in collision scenarios. In European safety and reliability conference; Safety and reliability for managing risk; ESREL 2006 (pp. 2795-2804). Francis, London.
25. M. Grabowski, J.R.W. Merrick, J.R. Harrold, T.A. Massuchi, and J.D. van Dorp Risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A: Syst Hum 30 2000 651 660 (Pubitemid 32169081)
26. P. Szwed Risk factors and theory building a study to improve passenger vessel safety WMU J Maritime Affairs 10 2011 183 208
27. A. Madsen, M. Lang, U. Kjrulff, and F. Jensen The hugin tool for learning Bayesian networks T. Nielsen, N. Zhang, ECSQARU 2003, LNAI 2711 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 594 605
28. A. Darwiche Modeling and reasoning with Bayesian networks 1st ed. 2009 Cambridge University Press, New York, USA
29. M. Druzdzel, and L. van der Gaag Building probabilistic networks: "Where do the numbers come from?" guest editors' instruction IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12 2000 481 486
30. J. Montewka, M. Weckström, and P. Kujala A probabilistic model estimating oil spill clean-up costs - a case study for the gulf of finland Mar Pollut Bull 76 2013 61 71
31. E. Zio, and G. Apostolakis Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 1996 225 241 (Pubitemid 126365925)
32. S. Kaplan The words of risk analysis Risk Anal 17 1997 407 417 (Pubitemid 27423960)
33. Ö.S. Ulusçu, B. Özbaş, T. AltIok, and I.̇ Or Risk analysis of the vessel traffic in the strait of Istanbul Risk Anal 29 2009 1454 1472
34. J.R. van Dorp, and J.R.W. Merrick On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation Ann Oper Res 187 2011 249 277
35. A. Stirling, and D. Gee Science, precaution, and practice Public Health Rep 117 2002 521 533 (Pubitemid 36222514)
36. J. Montewka, F. Goerland, and P. Kujala On a risk perspective for maritime domain J Pol Saf Reliab Assoc 4 2013 101 108
37. P. Myllymäki, T. Silander, H. Tirri, and P. Uronen B-course a web-based tool for Bayesian and causal data analysis Int J Artif Intell Tools 11 2002 369 387
38. Kontkanen, P., Myllymaki, P., Silander, T., & Tirri, H. (1997). Comparing predictive inference methods for discrete domains. In Sixth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 311-318).
39. L. Uusitalo Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling Ecol Model 203 2007 312 318 (Pubitemid 46529068)
40. M. Hänninen, and P. Kujala Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 102 2012 27 40
41. J.R. Merrick, and J.R. Van Dorp Speaking the truth in maritime risk assessment Risk Anal 26 2006 223 237
42. F. Goerlandt, K. Ståhlberg, and P. Kujala Influence of impact scenario models on collision risk analysis Ocean Eng 47 2012 74 87
43. T. Aven A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111 2013 30 36
44. P.T. Pedersen Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures Mar Struct 23 2010 241 262
45. F. Goerlandt, and P. Kujala Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 2011 91 107
46. S. Li, Q. Meng, and X. Qu An overview of maritime waterway quantitative risk assessment models Risk Anal 32 2012 496 512
47. Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Kujala P. Modeling the risk of ship grounding - a literature review from a risk management perspective. WMU J Maritime Affairs http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0056-3, 2013;12.
48. J. Montewka, P. Krata, F. Goerlandt, and P. Kujala Marine traffic risk modelling - an innovative approach and a case study Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 225 2011 307 322
49. Montewka J, Ehlers S, Tabri K. Elements of risk analysis for LNG tanker maneuvering with tug assistance in a harbor. In: 11th international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures, vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: PRADS. 2010, p. 1563-72.
50. G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems Science 250 1990 1359 1364 (Pubitemid 120031846)
51. T. Aven, and G. Reniers How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting Saf Sci 51 2013 223 231
52. R.L. Winkler Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 1996 127 132 (Pubitemid 126365917)
53. H. Langseth, and L. Portinale Bayesian networks in reliability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2007 92 108 (Pubitemid 44332140)
54. E. Vanem, S. Rusås, R. Skjong, and O. Olufsen Collision damage stability of passenger ships holistic and risk-based approach Int Shipbuild Prog. 54 2007 323 337 (Pubitemid 351495576)
55. T. Aven, and B. Heide Reliability and validity of risk analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009 1862 1868
56. M.E. Paté-Cornell Uncertainties in risk analysis six levels of treatment Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 1996 95 111 (Pubitemid 126365914)
57. Laboratory DS. GeNIe Documentation. University of Pittsburgh. Availalble from: 〈 http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/wiki/GeNIe-Documentation âŒ, 2011.
58. Drużdzel M. Genie: A development environment for graphical decision-analytic models. In: Association AMI, editor. Proceedings of the annual symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), 1999, Washington, DC. p. 1206.
59. P. Kujala, M. Hanninen, T. Arola, and J. Ylitalo Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the gulf of finland Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 2009 1349 1357
60. Lützen M. Ship collision damage [Ph.D. thesis]. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2001.
61. J. Weng, Q. Meng, and X. Qu Vessel collision frequency estimation in the singapore strait J Navig 65 2012 207 221
62. Tabri K. Dynamics of ship collisions [Ph.D. thesis]. Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Espoo, Finland, 2010.
63. S. Ehlers, and K. Tabri A combined numerical and semi-analytical collision damage assessment procedure Mar Struct 28 2012 101 119
64. Ehlers S. Material relation to assess the crashworthiness of ship structures [Ph.D. thesis]. Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Espoo, Finland, 2010.
65. S. Ehlers The influence of the material relation on the accuracy of collision simulations Mar Struct 23 2010 462 474
66. K. Ståhlberg, F. Goerlandt, S. Ehlers, and P. Kujala Impact scenario models for probabilistic risk-based design for ship-ship collision Mar Struct 33 2013 238 264
67. Papanikolaou A. Benchmark study on the capsizing of a damaged ro-ro passenger ship in waves. Issued for comments to: the ITTC specialist committee on the prediction of extreme motions and capsizing, 2001.
68. Papanikolaou A, Spanos D. Benchmark study on numerical codes for the prediction of damage ship stability in waves. In: Proceedings of the 10th international ship stability workshop. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd; 2007.
69. M. Schreuder, P. Hogström, J. Ringsberg, E. Johnson, and J C.-E. A method for assessment of the survival time of a ship damaged by collision J Ship Res 55 2011 86 99
70. BMT Ltd, Global Wave Statistics, BMT Ltd, London, 1986.
71. BureauVeritas, Rules for the classification of steel ships. Technical Report, Bureau Veritas; 2005.
72. J. Matusiak On the non-linearities of ships restoring and the Froude-Krylov wave load part Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 3 2011 111 115
73. IMO, Guidelines for evacuation analysis for new and existing passenger ships, MSC.1/Circ.1238, 2007.
74. TALLINK, Tallink exceeded the milestone of 900 000 passengers in June, 2013.
75. H. Chan, and A. Darwiche When do numbers really matter? J Artif Intell Res 17 2002 265 287
76. Hugin Experts A/S, HUGIN API reference manual. Technical Report Version 7.4, Hugin; 2010. Available online: 〈 http://download.hugin. com/webdocs/manuals/api-manual.pdf âŒ.
77. Jasionowski A, Vassalos D, Scott A. Ship vulnerability to flooding. In: 3rd international maritime conference on design for safety, Berkeley, California, 2007.
78. A.I. Ginnis, K.V. Kostas, C. Politis, and P.D. Kaklis Velos a VR platform for ship-evacuation analysis Comput Aided Des 42 2010 1045 1058
79. M.-I. Roh, and S. Ha Advanced ship evacuation analysis using a cell-based simulation model Computers in Industry 64 1 2013 80 89
80. E. Vanem, and R. Skjong Designing for safety in passenger ships utilizing advanced evacuation analyses - a risk based approach Saf Sci 44 2006 111 135 (Pubitemid 41820975)
81. D. Łozowicka Organization of evacuation from passenger ships-a concept of safety enhancement Zesz Naukowe 32 2012 110 114
82. D.H. Łozowicka Problems associated with evacuation from the ship in case of an emergency situation Int J Autom Comput 3 2006 165 168