A probabilistic model estimating oil spill clean-up costs - A case study for the Gulf of Finland

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volumn 76, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 61-71

  Montewka, Jakub ^a   Weckström, Mia ^a   Kujala, Pentti ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bayesian Belief Networks; Clean up costs; Maritime traffic; Oil spill; Risk analysis; The Gulf of Finland

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCES; CLEAN-UP COST; DATA AND INFORMATION; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; GULF OF FINLAND; MARITIME TRAFFIC; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SYSTEMATIC MODELING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ESTIMATION; MARINE POLLUTION; OIL SPILLS; RISK ANALYSIS;

COST ESTIMATING;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLEANUP; COST; NUMERICAL MODEL; OIL SPILL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CASE STUDY; CLEAN UP COST; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION; FINLAND; OIL SPILL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEA POLLUTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; GULF OF FINLAND;

BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; CLEAN-UP COSTS; MARITIME TRAFFIC; OIL SPILL; RISK ANALYSIS; THE GULF OF FINLAND;

ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; FINLAND; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PETROLEUM POLLUTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84886096859     PISSN: 0025326X     EISSN: 18793363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aguilera P.A., Fernández A., Fernández R., Rumí R., Salmerón A. Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(12):1376-1388.
2. Andrejev O., Soomere T., Sokolov A., Myrberg K. The role of the spatial resolution of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model for marine transport risk assessment. Oceanologia 2011, 53(1-TI):309-334.
3. Aps R., Fetissov M., Herkül K., Kotta J., Leiger R., Mander Ü., Suursaar Ü. Bayesian inference for predicting potential oil spill related ecological risk. Safety and Security Engineering III 2009, 108:149-159.
4. Bromley J., Jackson N.A., Clymer O.J., Giacomello A.M., Jensen F.V. The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20(2):231-242.
5. Darwiche A. Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks 2009, Cambridge University Press. first ed.
6. Eckle Petrissa, Burgherr P. Bayesian Data Analysis of Severe Fatal Accident Risk in the Oil Chain. Risk Analysis 2013, 33(1):146-160.
7. EMSA, 2012. Network of Stand-by Oil Spill Response Vessels and Equipment.
8. Etkin, D., 1999. Estimating cleanup costs for oil spills. In: the Proceedings of 1999 International Oil Spill Conference.
9. Etkin, D.S., 2000. Worldwide analysis of marine oil spill cleanup cost factors. In: Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical, Seminar.
10. Goerlandt F., Kujala P. Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96(1):91-107.
11. Hanninen, M., Mazaheri, A., Kujala, P., Montewka, J., Laaksonen, P., Salmiovirta, M., Klang, M., September 2013. Expert elicitation of a navigation service implementation effects on ship groundings and collisions in the Gulf of Finland. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, pp. 1748006X13494533-
12. HELCOM, 2012. HELCOM Manual on Co-operation in Response to Marine Pollution within the framework of the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, (Helsinki Convention), Helsinki.
13. HELCOM, 2013. Accidents and response. Compilation on ship accidents in the Baltic Sea area. (accessed 07.10.13). http://www.helcom.fi/shipping/accidents/en_GB/accidents/.
14. Helle I., Lecklin T., Jolma A., Kuikka S. Modeling the effectiveness of oil combating from an ecological perspective - a Bayesian network for the Gulf of Finland; the Baltic Sea. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185(1):182-192.
15. Hietala, M., Lampela, K., December 2007. Oil spill response preparedness at sea - final report SY41/2007 (Öljyntorjuntavalmius merellä - työryhmän loppuraportti) - in Finnish. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki.
16. IMO, 2002. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. International Maritime Organization.
17. Juntunen, T., 2005. Oil pollution modelling in the Gulf of Finland with the use of Bayesian Networks, University of Helsinki.
18. Juntunen, T., Rosqvist, T., Rytkönen, J., Kuikka, S., 2005. How to model the oil combating technologies and their impacts on ecosystem: a Bayesian networks application in the Baltic Sea. In: ICES 2005, pp. S:02.
19. Ympäristökeskus Kaakkois-Suomen, 2009. Waste management plan for South and Western Finland (Etelä- ja Länsi-Suomen jätesuunnitelma, Taustaraportti - Jätehuolto poikkeuksellisissa tilanteissa) in Finnish., Kouvola.
20. Kahma, K., Pettersson, H., 1993. Wave Statistics from the Gulf of Finland 1982-1985, Helsinki.
21. Kontovas C.A., Psaraftis H.N., Ventikos N.P. An empirical analysis of IOPCF oil spill cost data. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60(9):1455-1466.
22. Lecklin T., Ryömä R., Kuikka S. A Bayesian network for analyzing biological acute and long-term impacts of an oil spill in the Gulf of Finland. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62(12):2822-2835.
23. Lehikoinen A., Luoma E., Mäntyniemi S., Kuikka S. Optimizing the recovery efficiency of Finnish oil combating vessels in the Gulf of Finland using Bayesian Networks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, (January).
24. Liu X., Wirtz K.W. Total oil spill costs and compensations. Mar. Pol. Manage. 2006, 33(1):49-60.
25. Liu X., Wirtz K.W. The economy of oil spills: direct and indirect costs as a function of spill size. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171(1-3):471-477.
26. Marita Mustonen, M.K., 2013. Wave height records in the Baltic Sea. Finnish Environment Institute SYKE.
27. McCay D.F., Rowe J.J., Whittier N., Sankaranarayanan S., Etkin D.S. Estimation of potential impacts and natural resource damages of oil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 107(1-2):11-25.
28. Montewka J., Krata P., Goerland F., Kujala P. A model for risk analysis of oil tankers. Arch. Transp. 2010, 22(4):423-445.
29. Montewka, J., Ehlers, S., Tabri, K., 2010. Elements of risk analysis for LNG tanker maneuvering with tug assistance in a harbor. In: 11th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS 2010, vol. 2, pp. 1563-1572.
30. Montewka J., Goerlandt F., Ehlers S., Kujala P., Erceg S., Polic D., Klanac A., Hinz T., Tabri K. A model for consequence evaluation of ship-ship collision based on Bayesian Belief Network. Sustainable Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources 2011, 721-728. CRC Press.
31. Montewka, J., Ehlers, S., Goerlandt, F., Hinz, T., Kujala, P., 2012. A model for risk analysis of RoPax ships - the Gulf of Finland case. In: 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012. pp. 5544-5553.
32. Partila, M., 2010. Separation instruction formation for oily waste fractions after tanker accident (Alusöljyvahingon seurauksena rantautuvan öljyn lajitteluohjeiston muodostaminen) - in Finnish, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta.
33. Psarros G., Skjong R., Vanem E. Risk acceptance criterion for tanker oil spill risk reduction measures. Mar. Pollut. Bull. Jan. 2011, 62(1):116-127.
34. Shahriari M., Frost A. Oil spill cleanup cost estimation-Developing a mathematical model for marine environment. Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2008, 86(3):189-197.
35. Shikida, A., 1999. The statistical analysis of manual removal of stranded oil spills: lessons learned from oil spills caused by the Russian tanker Nakhodka. In: International oil spill conference, pp. 1119-1121.
36. Soomere T., Andrejev O., Myrberg K., Sokolov A. The use of Lagrangian trajectories for the identification of the environmentally safe fairways. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62(7):1410-1420.
37. SYKE, March 2011. New Oil and Chemical Spill Response Vessel was given the name Louhi.
38. SYKE, 2012. Syke Finland to host this year's Baltic Sea region oil response exercise. (accessed 07.08.13). http://www.syke.fi/en-US/SYKE_Info/Communications_material/Press_releases/Finland_to_host_this_years_Baltic_Sea_re(3324).
39. Uusitalo L. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol. Modell. 2007, 203(3-4):312-318.
40. Viikmäe B., Soomere T. Spatial pattern of current-driven hits to the nearshore from a major marine fairway in the Gulf of Finland. J. Mar. Syst. 2013, (July).
41. Yamada Y. The cost of oil spills from tankers in relation to weight of spilled oil. Mar. Technol. 2009, 46(4):10.