Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 102, Issue , 2012, Pages 27-40

  Hänninen, Maria ^a   Kujala, Pentti ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Causation probability; Maritime accidents; Mutual information; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

DANGER DETECTION; GULF OF FINLAND; MODEL VARIABLES; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; NETWORK VARIABLES; NUMERICAL VALUES; RELATIVE VALUE; SHIP COLLISION; SITUATION ASSESSMENT;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHIPS; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84858134422     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Y. Fujii, H. Yamanouchi, and N. Mizuki Some factors affecting the frequency of accidents in marine traffic. II: the probability of stranding. III: the effect of darkness on the probability of stranding Journal of Navigation 27 1974 21 43
2. T. MacDuff The probability of vessel collisions Ocean Industry 9 9 1974 144 148
3. P. Pedersen Collision and grounding mechanics Proceedings of WEMT 95 1995 125 157
4. T. Fowler, and E. Sørgård Modeling ship transportation risk Risk Analysis 20 2 2000 225 244 (ISSN 1539-6924) (Pubitemid 30354442)
5. J. Montewka, T. Hinz, P. Kujala, and J. Matusiak Probability modelling of vessel collisions Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 5 2010 573 589
6. F. Goerlandt, and P. Kujala Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96 1 2011 91 107
7. J. van Dorp, and J. Merrick On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation Annals of Operations Research 187 1 2011 249 277
8. Rosqvist T, Nyman T, Sonninen S, Tuominen R. The implementation of the VTMIS system for the Gulf of Finland - a FSA study. In: RINA international conference on formal safety assessment, London, UK. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (RINA), Citeseer; 2002. p. 151-64.
9. P. Friis-Hansen, and B. Simonsen GRACAT: software for grounding and collision risk analysis Marine Structures 15 4-5 2002 383 401 (Pubitemid 34792310)
10. Det Norske Veritas. Formal safety assessment - large passenger ships. Technical report. DNV; 2003.
11. Rambøll, Navigational safety in the Sound between Denmark and Sweden (Øresund). Risk and cost-benefit analysis. Technical report. Rambøll Danmark A/S; 2006.
12. P. Kujala, M. Hänninen, T. Arola, and J. Ylitalo Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 8 2009 1349 1357
13. C. Hetherington, R. Flin, and K. Mearns Safety in shipping: the human element Journal of Safety Research 37 4 2006 401 411 (Pubitemid 44592601)
14. Rothblum A. Human error and marine safety. In: Maritime human factors conference; 2000. p. 13-4.
15. M. Grabowski, J. Merrick, J. Harrold, T. Massuchi, and J. van Dorp Risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 30 6 2000 651 660 (Pubitemid 32169081)
16. J. Schröder-Hinrichs, M. Baldauf, and K. Ghirxi Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions Accident Analysis & Prevention 43 3 2011 1187 1196
17. Guedes Soares C, Teixeira A, Antão P. Accounting for human factors in the analysis of maritime accidents. In: Cottam MP, Harvey DW, Pape RP, Tait J, editors. Foresight and precaution; 2000. p. 521-8.
18. Friis-Hansen A. Bayesian networks as a decision support tool in marine applications. Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, PhD thesis. Technical University of Denmark; 2000.
19. S. Hu, X. Li, Q. Fang, and Z. Yang Use of Bayesian method for assessing vessel traffic risks at sea International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 7 4 2008 627 638
20. Montewka J, Ehlers S, Tabri K. Elements of risk analysis for a LNG tanker maneuvering with tug assistance in a harbour. In: The 11th international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structure. COPPE/UFRJ; 2010, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2010. p. 1563-72.
21. Montewka J, Goerlandt E, Ehlers S, Kujala P, Guedes Erceg S, Polic D, et al. A model for consequence evaluation of ship-ship collision based on Bayesian belief network. In: Rizutto E, Guedes Soares C, editors. Sustainable maritime transportation and exploitation of sea resources. Taylor & Francis; 2011. p. 721-8.
22. D. Embrey Incorporating management and organisational factors into probabilistic safety assessment Reliability Engineering & System Safety 38 1-2 1992 199 208 (Pubitemid 23583820)
23. M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell, and D. Murphy Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications Reliability Engineering & System Safety 53 2 1996 115 126 (Pubitemid 126359232)
24. K. Øien A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators Reliability Engineering & System Safety 74 2 2001 147 167 (Pubitemid 32935123)
25. Z. Mohaghegh, R. Kazemi, and A. Mosleh Incorporating organizational factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: a hybrid technique formalization Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 5 2009 1000 1018
26. A. Eleye-Datubo, A. Wall, and J. Wang Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modeling in a fuzzy-Bayesian network of an induced mass assignment paradigm Risk Analysis 28 1 2008 95 112 (Pubitemid 351315504)
27. P. Trucco, E. Cagno, F. Ruggeri, and O. Grande A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 6 2008 845 856 (Pubitemid 351305172)
28. M. Pradhan, M. Henrion, G. Provan, B. Del Favero, and K. Huang The sensitivity of belief networks to imprecise probabilities: an experimental investigation Artificial Intelligence 85 1-2 1996 363 397 (Pubitemid 126363735)
29. Henrion M, Pradhan M, Del Favero B, Huang K, Provan G, ORorke P. Why is diagnosis using belief networks insensitive to imprecision in probabilities. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Citeseer; 1996. p. 307-14.
30. Kipersztok O, Wang H. Another look at sensitivity of Bayesian networks to imprecise probabilities. In: Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics (AISTAT-2001), Citeseer; 2001. p. 226-32.
31. H. Chan, and A. Darwiche When do numbers really matter? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17 2002 265 287
32. Onisko A, Druzdzel M. Effect of imprecision in probabilities on Bayesian network models: an empirical study. In: AIME workshop on model-based and qualitative reasoning in biomedicine, Protaras, Cyprus, October 2003. Citeseer; 2003. p. 45.
33. J. Bondy, and U. Murty Graph theory with applications vol. 290 1976 MacMillan London
34. F.V. Jensen, and T.D. Nielsen Bayesian networks and decision graphs second ed. 2007 Springer
35. Det Norske Veritas, Formal safety assessment of Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS). Technical report. DNV; 2006.
36. A. Madsen, F. Jensen, U. Kjärulff, and M. Lang The Hugin tool for probabilistic graphical models International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools 14 3 2005 507 544 (Pubitemid 40809056)
37. V. Coupé, and L. Van Der Gaag Properties of sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 36 4 2002 323 356 (Pubitemid 37132955)
38. L. Van der Gaag, S. Renooij, and V. Coupé Sensitivity analysis of probabilistic networks P. Lucas, J. Gámez, A. Salmerón, Advances in probabilistic graphical models. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing vol. 213 2007 Springer 103 124
39. Woodberry O, Nicholson A, Korb K, Pollino C. Parameterising Bayesian networks: a case study in ecological risk assessment. In: Proceedings of Pacific Rim international conference on artificial intelligence; 2004.
40. C. Shannon A mathematical theory of communication The Bell System Technical Journal 27 1948 379 423 623-56
41. Grech M, Horberry T, Smith A. Human error in maritime operations: analyses of accident reports using the leximancer tool. In: Human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting proceedings, vol. 46. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2002. p. 1718-22 ISSN 1071-1813.
42. Accident Investigation Board Finland. Factors contributing to fatigue and its frequency in bridge work. Technical report. Investigation report S3/2004M, Accident Investigation Board Finland; 2008.
43. Lützhöft M, Thorslund B, Kircher A, Gillberg M. Fatigue at sea - a field study in Swedish shipping. Technical report. VTI rapport 586A, VTI; 2007.
44. Hänninen H. Negotiated risks: the Estonia accident and the stream of bow visor failures in the Baltic ferry traffic. Helsinki School of Economics; 2007.
45. J. Lappalainen, A. Vepsäläinen, K. Salmi, and U. Tapaninen Incident reporting in Finnish shipping companies WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 2011 1 15
46. J. Reason Human error 1990 Cambridge University Press
47. Merrick J, van Dorp J, Mazzuchi T, Harrald J. Modeling risk in the dynamic environment of maritime transportation. In: Proceedings of the 33rd conference on winter simulation. IEEE Computer Society; 2001. p. 1090-8 ISBN 078037309X. (Pubitemid 34124963)
48. Fujii Y. Integrated study on marine traffic accidents. In: IABSE colloquium on ship collision with bridges and offshore structures; 1983. p. 91-8. (Pubitemid 14498375)
49. Hänninen M, Ylitalo J. Estimating ship-ship collision probability in the Gulf of Finland. In: Fifth international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Espoo, Finland, 14-16 June 2010. No. TKK-AM-16 in Series AM. Aalto University School of Science and Technology; 2010. p. 250-5.
50. Jalonen R, Tirkkonen A. Safety assessment: the use of the English language in the fairway-specific pilotage on the Finnish maritime safety, 2nd ed. (in Finnish). Technical report. Merenkulkulaitoksen julkaisuja 1/2009. Finnish Maritime Administration; 2009.
51. Finnish Meteorological Institute. Weather statistics [online] 〈 http://www.fmi.fi 〉, n.d.
52. International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA), Predicting Collision Frequencies - IWRAP Wiki; 2010 〈 http://www.ialathree.org/iwrap/index.php?title=Predicting-Collision-Frequencies 〉.