Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures

Marine Structures

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 241-262

  Pedersen, P Terndrup ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Grounding; Review; Risk analysis; Ship collisions

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC COSTS; ECONOMIC RISKS; GROUNDING; GROUNDING ANALYSIS; MARITIME INDUSTRY; PERFORMANCE BASED; PREDICTION AND ANALYSIS; SHIP COLLISION; SHIP COLLISIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIPS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COLLISION; MITIGATION; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIP DESIGN;

EID: 77956618427     PISSN: 09518339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Wang G., Spencer J., Chen Y. Assessment of a ship's performance in accidents. Mar Struct 2002, Vol. 15:313-333.
2. ISSC Committee V.I Collision and grounding. 16th International ship and offshore congress, Southampton 2006, vol. 2. 1-62.
3. Samuelides M.S. Design against collision: half a century of research. Proceedings of the tenth international marine design conference, Trondheim 2009, 456-475. S.O. Erikstad (Ed.).
4. Vanem E, Skjong, R. Collision and grounding of passenger ships - risk assessment and emergency evacuations. In: Third international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS), Izu, Japan; October 2004, p. 195-202.
5. Vanem E., Endresen Ø, Skjong R. CATS - cost-effectiveness in designing for oil spill prevention. Tenth international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures, Houston, Texas 2007, vol. 1. 266-274.
6. IMO, FSA Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) carriers, details of the formal safety assessment 2007, Submitted by Denmark, MSC 83/21/1, IMO, FSA.
7. Vanem E., Antão P., Castillo de Comas F., Skjong R. Formal safety assessment of LNG tankers. Tenth international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures, Houston, Texas 2007, vol. 1. 82-90.
8. Moan T., Amdahl J., Wang X.Z., Spencer J. Risk assessment of FPSOs with emphasis on collision. SNAME Trans 2002, 110:307-338.
9. Wang G, Pedersen PT. Risk of ship collisions to offshore structures. In: Proceedings of OMAE2007, the 26th offshore mechanics and arctic engineering conference, San Diego, USA; 10-15 June 2007.
10. Pedersen P.T. Collision risk for fixed offshore structures close to high-density shipping lanes. J Eng Maritime Environ 2002, 216(M1):29-44.
11. IMO Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process 2002, International Maritime Organization, MSC/Circl. 1023.
12. Germanischer Lloyd Rules for classification and construction. Ship Technology. Part 1 Seagoing ships 2004, Germanischer Lloyd, Chapter 1 - Hull structures. Section 33: Strengthening against collisions.
13. Samuelides M.S., Tabri K., Incecik A., Dimou D. Scenarios for the assessment of the collision behavior of ships. Int Shipbuild Prog 2008, 55:145-162.
14. API API recommended practice 2A-WSD: Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms - working stress design 2000, American Petroleum Institute.
15. Ditlevsen O., Friis-Hansen P. Life quality time allocation index - an equilibrium economy consistent version of the current life quality index. Struct Safety 2005, 27(3):262-275.
16. Mcgregor JI, Moore CS, Downes J, Aksu, S. Evaluation of the environmental risk of aframax tankers. Proceedings world maritime technology conference, Mumbai, January 2009.
17. Skjong R. Regulatory framework. Risk-based ship design; methods, tools and applications 2009, Springer, [chapter 3]. A.D. Papanikolaou (Ed.).
18. Sames PC, Hamann R. Towards environmental risk acceptance criteria. Proceedings of the ASME 27th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Estoril 2008, paper No. OMAE2008-57257, 2008.
19. Vanem E., Eide M.S., Gravir G., Skjong R. Cost effectiveness of preventing grounding with ECDIS. Fourth international conference on collision and grounding of ships 2007, 219-226. Hamburg University of Technology, Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft.
20. Pedersen PT, Friis-Hansen P, Nielsen LP. Collision risk and damage after collision. RINA international conference on the safety of passenger RoRo vessels; 1996.
21. Aarsætter K.G., Moan T. Estimating navigation patterns from AIS. J Navigat 2009, 62:573-589.
22. Kaneko F. Effectiveness of separation scheme for prevention of collision by diminishing ships' encounter probability. Proceedings of the third international conference on collision and grounding of ships, ICCGS 2004, Izu, Japan 2004, 211-221. Society of Naval Architects of Japan.
23. Kaneko F., Hara D. Estimation of dangerous encounters' number from observed ship trajectories. Fourth international conference on collision and grounding of ships 2007, 187-193. Hamburg University of Technology, Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft.
24. Friis-Hansen P, Ravn ES, Hartmann JP, Sorensen A. FSA of the navigational safety in Baltic West. Third international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS), Izu, Japan, October 2004, p. 25-27.
25. Itoh H., Kaneko F., Mitimi N., Tamura K. A probabilistic model for the consequences of collision casualties. Fourth international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Hamburg University of Technology 2007, 201-206. Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft.
26. Ravn E. Collision and grounding. Section D, SAFEDOR training course on risk based ship design, August 25-27 2008, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, D1-D52.
27. Jensen J.J., Soares C.G., Papanikolao A. Methods and tools. Risk-based ship design: methods, tools and applications 2009, Springer, [chapter 5]. A.D. Papanikolaou (Ed.).
28. Montewka J., Hinz T., Kujala P., Matusiak J. Probability modeling of vessel collisions. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2010, 95:573-589.
29. Lützen M, Friis-Hansen P. Risk reducing effect of AIS implementation on collision risk. Proceedings of Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, San Francisco; 2003, p. 13.
30. Cerup-Simonsen B. Real-time simulation of ship impact for crew training. Mar Technol 2003, 40(No. 1):249-257.
31. Otto S., Pedersen P.T., Samuelidis M., Sames P. Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry. Mar Struct 2002, 15(No. 4-5):461-475.
32. Pedersen P.T. Ship grounding and hull-girder strength. Mar Struct 1994, 7:1-29.
33. Friis-Hansen P., Cerup-Simonsen B. GRACAT: software for grounding and collision analysis. Mar Struct 2002, 15(No. 4-5):383-402.
34. Minorsky V.U. An analysis of ship collisions with reference to protection of nuclear power ships. J Ship Res 1959, 3(No. 2):1-4.
35. Pedersen P.T., Li Y. On the global ship hull bending energy in ship collisions. Mar Struct 2009, 22(1):2-11.
36. Pedersen P.T., Zhang S. On impact mechanics in ship collisions. Mar Struct 1998, (No. 11):429-449.
37. Brown A.J. Collision scenarios and probabilistic collision damage. J Mar Struct 2002, 15(No. 4-5):335-364.
38. Tabri K., Maattanen J., Ranta J. Model-scale experiments on symmetric ship collisions. J Mar Sci Technol 2008, 13(No. 1):71-84.
39. Tabri K., Broekhuijsen J., Matusiak J., Varsta P. Analytical modeling of ship collision based on full scale experiments. Mar Struct 2009, 22(1):42-61.
40. Lützen M. Ship collision damage. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; 2001. See: http://www.skk.mek.dtu.dk/English/Publikationer/PHD-rapporter/2001/ML.aspx.
41. Zhang A., Suzuki K. A comparative study of numerical simulations for fluid-structure interaction of liquid filled tank during ship collision. Ocean Eng 2007, 43(No. 5-6):645-652.
42. Tabri K., Matusiak J., Varsta P. Sloshing interaction in ship collisions - an experimental and numerical study. Ocean Eng 2009, 36(No. 17-18):1366-1376.
43. Abramowicz W., Cerup-Simonsen B. Effect of fracture on crushing of ship structures. J Ship Res 2003, 47(No. 3):194-207.
44. Cerup-Simonsen B., Törnqvist R. Experimental and numerical modeling of ductile crack propagation in large-scale shell structures. Mar Struct 2004, 17:1-27.
45. Servis D., Samuelides M.S. Implementation of the T-failure criterion in finite element methodologies. Computers Struct 2006, 84(No. 3-4):196-214.
46. Paik J.K. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (part 1: theory & part 2: verification). Ships Offshore Struct 2007, 2(No. 1):69-85.
47. Alsos H.S., Hoppertad O.S., Törnqvist R., Amdahl J. Analytical and numerical analysis of local necking using a stress based instability criterion. Int J Solids Struct 2008, 45:2042-2055.
48. Alsos H.S., Amdahl J. On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, part I: experiments. Int J Impact Eng 2008, 36(No. 6):799-807.
49. Alsos H.S., Amdahl J., Hopperstad O.S. On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, Part II: numerical analysis. Int J Impact Eng 2008, 36(No. 6):875-887.
50. Alsos H.S., Amdahl J. On the resistance of tanker bottom structures during stranding. Mar Struct 2007, 20(No. 3):218-237.
51. Ehlers S., Broekhuijsen J., Alsos H., Biehl F., Tabri K. Simulating the collision response of side ship structures: a failure criteria benchmark study. Int Shipbuild Prog 2008, 55:127-144.
52. Ehlers S., Varsta P. Strain and stress relation for non-linear finite element simulations. Thin Walled Struct 2009, 47:1203-1217.
53. Hogström P., Ringsberg J.W., Johnson E. An experimental and numerical study of the effects of length scale and strain state on the necking and fracture behaviour in sheet metals. Int J Impact Eng 2009, 36:1194-1203.
54. Sajdak J.A.K., Brown A.J. Modeling longitudinal damage in ship collisions 2005, Ship Structure Committee, SSC-437.
55. Yamada Y, Pedersen PT. Simplified analysis tool for ship-ship collisions. Proceedings of seventh offshore and polar engineering conference, ISOPE 2007; 2007, p. 3760-3764.
56. Yamada Y., Pedersen P.T. A benchmark study of procedures for analysis of axial crushing of bulbous bows. Mar Struct 2008, 21:257-293.
57. Hong L., Amdahl J. Plastic design of laterally patch loaded plates for ships. Mar Struct 2007, 20:124-142.
58. Hong L., Amdahl J. Crushing resistance of web girders in ship collision and grounding. Mar Struct 2008, 21:374-401.
59. Hong L., Amdahl J. Plastic mechanism analysis of the resistance of ship longitudinal girders in grounding and collision. Ships Offshore Struct 2008, 3(No. 3):159-171.
60. Lehmann E., Peschmann J. Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions. Mar Struct 2002, 15:429-441.
61. Ozguc O., Das P.K., Barltrop N. A comparative study on the structural integrity of single and double skin bulk carriers under collision damage. Mar Struct 2005, 18:511-547.
62. Shibue T., Abe A., Fujita K. The effect of the strut arrangement on the energy absorption of side structure in collision. Second international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS 2001) 2001, 171-178. Technical University of Denmark.
63. Sano A., Muraghishi O., Yoshikawa T., Motoi T. Strength analysis of a new double hull structure for a VLCC in collision. International conference on designs and methodologies for collision and grounding protection of ships 1996, 8.1-8.10. SNAME, San Francisco.
64. Kitamura O. Comparative study on collision resistance of side structure. Mar Technol 1997, 34:293-308.
65. Yamada Y., Pedersen P.T., Friis-Hansen P. The effect of buffer bow structures on collision damages of oil tankers. Fourth international conference on collision and grounding of ships: ICCGS 2007, 235-243. Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft e.V, Hamburg.
66. Vassalos D. Risk-based ship design. Risk-based ship design; methods, tools and applications 2009, Springer-Verlag, [chapter 2]. A.D. Papanikolaou (Ed.).
67. Naar H., Kujala P., Simonsen B.C., Ludolphy H. Comparison of the crashworthiness of various bottom and side structures. Mar Struct 2002, 15(No. 4-5):443-460.
68. Paik J.K. Innovative structural designs of tankers against ship collisions and grounding: a recent state-of-the-art review. Mar Technol 2003, 40:25-33.
69. Graaf B, Broekhuijsen J, Vredevelt A, Ven A. Construction aspects for the schelde Y-shape crashworthy hull structure. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS), Izu, Japan; 2004, p. 229-233.
70. Vredevelt AW, Wolf MJ, Broekhuisen J, Gret E. Safe transport of hazardous cargo through crashworthy side structures. In: Third international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS), Izu, Japan, October; 2004, p. 234-240.
71. Zhang S. Plate tearing and bottom damage in ship grounding. Mar Struct 2002, 15:101-117.
72. Ehlers S., Klanac A., Tabri K. Increased Safety of a Tanker and Ropax Vessel by Implementing a Novel Sandwich Structure. Fourth international conference on collision and grounding of ships 2007, Hamburg University of Technology, Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft, pp. 109-122.
73. Karlsson U.B. Improved collision safety by an intrusion-tolerant inner shell. Mar Technol 2009, 46(No. 3):165-173.
74. Endo H., Yamada Y., Kitamura O., Suzuki K. Model test on test on the collapse strength of the buffer bow structures. Mar Struct 2002, 15:365-381.
75. Yamada Y., Endo H.Y., Pedersen P.T. Effect of buffer bow structure in ship-ship collisions. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 2008, 18(No. 2):133-141. 1053-5381.
76. Brown A.J., Simbulan M., Mcquillan J., Gutierrez M. Predicting motion, structural loads, and damage in stranded ships 2004, SSC-434, Ship Structure Committee.
77. Cerup-Simonsen B., Törnquist R., Lützen M. A simplified grounding damage prediction method and its application in modern stability requirements. Mar Struct 2009, 22(No. 1):62-83.
78. Pedersen P.T., Zhang S. Absorbed energy in ship collision and grounding - revising Minorsky's empirical method. J Ship Res 2000, 44(2):40-54.
79. Tavakoli MT, Amdahl J, Ashrafan A, Leira BJ. Analytical predictions of oil spill from grounded cargo tankers. Proceedings ASME 27th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering OMAE 2008, Estoril, Portugal; 2008.