An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models

Risk Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 496-512

  Li, Suyi ^a   Meng, Qiang ^a   Qu, Xiaobo ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Causation probability; Maritime waterway; Quantitative risk assessment; Ship collision and grounding

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PAPER; CONSEQUENCE ESTIMATION; HUMAN ERRORS; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; MARITIME WATERWAY; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; PROJECT REPORTS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTIONS;

FREQUENCY ESTIMATION; SHIP MOCKUPS; SHIPS; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; ERROR ANALYSIS; FUTURE PROSPECT; GROUNDING (VESSEL); MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH WORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIP HANDLING; WATERWAY TRANSPORT;

EID: 84858295165     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01697.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. IMO. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process. London: International Maritime Organization, 2002.
2. IMO. Formal Safety Assessment FSA-Crude Oil Tankers. London: International Maritime Organization, 2008.
3. Macduff T. Probability of vessel collisions. Ocean Industry, 1974; 9(9):144-148.
4. Fujii Y, Yamanouchi H, Mizuki N. Some factors affecting the frequency of accidents in marine traffic, II: The probability of stranding, III: The effect of darkness on the probability of stranding. Journal of Navigation, 1974; 27:239-252.
5. Wang G, Spencer J, Chen Y. Assessment of a ship's performance in accidents. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):313-333.
6. Pedersen PT. Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures. Marine Structures, 2010; 13(3):241-262.
7. Montewka J, Hinz T, Kujala P, Matusiak J. Probability modelling of vessel collisions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010; 95(5):573-589.
8. Kujala P, Hanninen M, Arola T, Ylitalo J. Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009; 94(8):1349-1357.
9. Kaneko F. Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2002; 7(1):1-16.
10. Pedersen PT. Collision and Grounding Mechanics. Pp. 125-157 in Proceedings of the WEGEMT'95. Copenhagen, 1995.
11. Otto S, Pedersen PT, Samuelides M, Sames PC. Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):461-474.
12. Fowler TG, Sørgard E. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(2):225-244.
13. Friis-Hansen P, Pedersen PT. Risk analysis of conventional and solo watch keeping. Submitted to International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee by Denmark at the 69th Session. 1998.
14. Friis-Hansen P, Simonsen BC. GRACAT: Software for grounding and collision risk analysis. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):383-401.
15. Trucco P, Cagno E, Ruggeri F, Grande O. A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008; 93(6):845-856.
16. Szwed P, van Dorp JR, Merrick JRW, Mazzuchi TA, Singh A. A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006; 169(1):157-177.
17. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR. Speaking the truth in maritime risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 2006; 26(1):223-237.
18. Fujii Y, Tanaka K. Traffic capacity. Journal of Navigation, 1971; 24(4):543-552.
19. Goodwin EM. A statistical study of ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 1975; 28(3):328-344.
20. Coldwell TG. Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters. Journal of Navigation, 1982; 36:431-444.
21. Davis PV, Dove MJ, Stockel CJ. A computer simulation of multi-ship encounters. Journal of Navigation, 1982; 35(2):347-352.
22. Zhao J, Wu Z, Wang F. Comments on ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 1993; 46(3):422-436.
23. Szlapczynski R. A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain. Journal of Navigation, 2006; 59(3):477-490.
24. Pietrzykowski Z, Uriasz J. The ship domain-A criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area. Journal of Navigation, 2009; 62(1):93-108.
25. Pietrzykowski Z. Ship's fuzzy domain-A criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways. Journal of Navigation, 2008; 61(3):499-514.
26. Wang N. An intelligent spatial collision risk based on the quaternion ship domain. Journal of Navigation, 2010; 63(4):733-749.
27. Curtis RG. Ship collision model for overtaking. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1986; 37(4):397-406.
28. Pedersen PT, Zhang S. Collision analysis for MS Dextra. SAFER EURORO Spring Meeting, 1999; 1-33.
29. Rambøll Navigational safety in the Sound between Denmark and Sweden (Øresund), risk and cost-benefit analysis. Virum, Denmark The Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and Hydrography, the Danish Maritime Authority and the Swedish Maritime Administration, Rambøll Danmark A/S, Ref, 568125, R568125-002(1), August 24, 2006.
30. COWI. Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area Around Bornholm. Kongens Lyngby, Denmark: COWI A/S, Report No.: P-65775-002, January 25, 2008.
31. Tan B, Otay EN. Modeling and analysis of vessel casualties resulting from tanker traffic through narrow waterways. Naval Research Logistics, 1999; 46(8):871-892.
32. Roeleven D, Kok M, Stipdonk HL, De Vries WA. Inland waterway transport: Modelling the probability of accidents. Safety Science, 1995; 19(2-3):191-202.
33. Geng B, Wang H, Wang J. Probabilistic model for vessel-bridge collisions in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009; 3(3):279-285.
34. Debnath AK, Chin HC. Hierarchical modeling of perceived collision risks in port fairways. Transportation Research Record, 2009; 2100:68-75.
35. Chin HC, Debnath AK. Modeling perceived collision risk in port water navigation. Safety Science, 2009; 47(10):1410-1416.
36. GWU-RPI-VCU. The Washington State Ferries Risk Assessment. The George Washington University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Virginia Commonwealth University, July 1, 1999.
37. van Dorp JR, Merrick JRW, Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Grabowski M. A risk management procedure for the Washington state ferries. Risk Analysis, 2001; 21(1):127-142.
38. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA, Harrald JR, Spahn JE, Grabowski M. The Prince William sound risk assessment. Interfaces, 2002; 32(6):25-40.
39. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Blackford JP, Shaw GL, Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA. A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco Bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003; 81(2):119-132.
40. Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Spahn JE, van Dorp JR, Merrick JRW, Shrestha S, Grabowski M. Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system. Safety Science, 1998; 30(1-2):235-247.
41. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Spahn JE, Grabowski M. A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound. Systems Engineering, 2000; 3(3):128-142.
42. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA, Harrald JR. Modeling risk in the dynamic environment of maritime transportation. Pp. 1090-1098 in Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, Arlington, VA, 2001.
43. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Dinesh V. Assessing uncertainty in simulation-based maritime risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(3):731-743.
44. van Dorp JR, Merrick JRW. On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation. Annals of Operations Research, 2011; 187(1):249-377.
45. Ulusçu ÖS, Özbaş B, Altiok T, Or I. Risk analysis of the vessel traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29(10):1454-1472.
46. Hong Kong Marine Department. Marine Traffic Risk Assessment for Hong Kong Waters (MARA Study). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Marine Department, Report Ref: R8152/20 Issue 1, March, 2004.
47. th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, January 23-27, 2011.
48. IMO. Formal Safety Assessment FSA-Container Vessels. London: International Maritime Organization, Document No.: MSC83/INF.8, July 3, 2007.
49. IMO. Formal Safety Assessment FSA-Liquefied Natural Gas(LNG) Carriers. London: International Maritime Organization, Document No.: MSC83/INF.3, July 3, 2007.
50. IMO. Formal Safety Assessment FSA-Cruise Ships. London: International Maritime Organization, Document No.: MSC85/INF.2, July 21, 2008.
51. IMO. Formal Safety Assessment FSA-RoPax Ships. London: International Maritime Organization, Document No.: MSC85/INF.3, July 21, 2008.
52. Ronza A, Félez S, Darbra RM, Carol S, Vílchez JA, Casal J. Predicting the frequency of accidents in port areas by developing event trees from historical analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2003; 16(6):551-560.
53. Vanem E, Antão P, de Comas FDC, Skjong R. Formal safety assessment of LNG tankers. In 10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS, Houston, 2007.
54. Minorsky VU. An analysis of ship collisions with reference to protection of nuclear power plants. Journal of Ship Research, 1959; 3(2):1-4.
55. Servis DP, Samuelides M. Ship collision analysis using finite elements. In SAFER EURORO Spring Meeting, Nantes, 1999.
56. Chen D. Simplified Ship Collision Model, Master Thesis,: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia ; January, 2000.
57. Transportation Research Board. Environmental Performance of Tanker Designs in Collision and Grounding, Methods for Comparison. Washington, DC: Marine Board, Transportation Research Board, The National Academies, National Academy Press, Special report 259, 2001.
58. Brown A, Chen D. Probabilistic method for predicting ship collision damage. Ocean Engineering International Journal, 2002; 6(1):54-65.
59. Brown A. Collision scenarios and probabilistic collision damage. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):335-364.
60. Van de Wiel G, Van Dorp JR. An oil outflow model for tanker collisions and groundings. Annals of Operations Research, 2011; 187(1):279-304.
61. Pedersen PT, Zhang S. On impact mechanics in ship collisions. Marine Structures, 1998; 11(10):429-449.
62. Pedersen PT, Zhang S. Absorbed energy in ship collisions and grounding-revising Minorsky's empirical method. Journal of Ship Research, 2000; 44(2):140-154.
63. Glykas A, Das PK. Energy conservation during grounding with rigid slopes. Ocean Engineering, 2001; 28(4):397-415.
64. Glykas A, Das PK. Energy conservation during a tanker collision. Ocean Engineering, 2001; 28(4):361-374.
65. Glykas A, Das PK, Barltrop N. Application of failure and fracture criteria during a tanker head-on collision. Ocean Engineering, 2001; 28(4):375-395.
66. Lehmann E, Peschmann J. Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):429-441.
67. Tabri K, Broekhuijsen J, Matusiak J, Varsta P. Analytical modelling of ship collision based on full-scale experiments. Marine Structures, 2009; 22(1):42-61.
68. Asadi GV, Vaughan H. Dynamics and structural damage of tanker ships running aground. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1990; 25(1-2):61-73.
69. Ohtsubo H, Kawamoto Y, Kuroiwa T. Experimental and numerical research on ship collision and grounding of oil tankers. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1994; 150(2-3):385-396.
70. Paik JK, Pedersen PT. Modelling of the internal mechanics in ship collisions. Ocean Engineering, 1996; 23(2):107-142.
71. Simonsen BC, Wierzbicki T. Grounding bottom damage and ship motion over a rock. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 1996; 6(3):195-202.
72. Simonsen BC. Ship grounding on rock-I. Theory. Marine Structures, 1997; 10(7):519-562.
73. Simonsen BC. Ship grounding on rock-II. Validation and application. Marine Structures, 1997; 10(7):563-584.
74. Pedersen PT, Zhang S. Effect of ship structure and size on grounding and collision damage distributions. Ocean Engineering, 2000; 27(11):1161-1179.
75. Kitamura O. FEM approach to the simulation of collision and grounding damage. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(4-5):403-428.
76. Wang G, Chen Y, Zhang H, Peng H. Longitudinal strength of ships with accidental damages. Marine Structures, 2002; 15(2):119-138.
77. Ozguc O, Das PK, Barltrop N. A comparative study on the structural integrity of single and double side skin bulk carriers under collision damage. Marine Structures, 2005; 18(7-8):511-547.
78. Ehlers S, Broekhuijsen J, Alsos HS, Biehl F, Tabri K. Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: A failure criteria benchmark study. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2008; 55(1-2):127-144.
79. Luís RM, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C. Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded. Structural Safety, 2009; 31(3):224-233.
80. Cuesta I, Grau FX, Giralt F. Numerical simulation of oil spills in a generalized domain. Oil and Chemical Pollution, 1990; 7(2):143-159.
81. Sirkar J, Ameer P, Brown AJ, Goss P, Michel K, Nicastro F, Willis W. A framework for assessing the environmental performance of tankers in accidental grounding and collision. SNAME Transactions, 1997; 105:253-295.
82. Rawson C, Crake K, Brown AJ. Assessing the environmental performance of tankers in accidental grounding and collision. SNAME Transactions, 1998; 106:41-58.
83. Skjong R, Vanem E. Damage stability evaluation in collision of bulk carriers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships (ICCGS2004), Japan, 2004.
84. Vanem E, Skjong R. Collision and grounding of passenger ships-Risk assessment and emergency evacuations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships (ICCGS2004), Japan, 2004.
85. Fang C, Das PK. Survivability and reliability of damaged ships after collision and grounding. Ocean Engineering, 2005; 32(3-4):293-307.
86. Macrae C. Human factors at sea: Common patterns of error in groundings and collisions. Maritime Policy and Management, 2009; 36(1):21-38.
87. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Singh A. Analysis of correlated expert judgments from extended pairwise comparisons. Decision Analysis, 2005; 2(1):17-29.