Clustering Methods in a Protein-Protein Interaction Network

Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics: Techniques, Methods, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 319-355

  Lin, Chuan ^a   Cho, Young Rae ^a   Hwang, Woo Chang ^a   Pei, Pengjun ^a   Zhang, Aidong ^a  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustering approaches for PPI networks; Clustering methods in protein protein interaction network; Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889619993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470124642.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. http://www.plbio.kvl.dk/dacoj3/resource/yeast_2H.htm.
2. R. Aebersold and M. Mann. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422:198-207, 2003.
3. R. Albert and A. Barabasi. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys., 74:47-97, 2002.
4. U. Alon. Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer Science, 301:1866-1867, 2003.
5. S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25:3389-3402, 1997.
6. V. Arnau, S. Mars, and I. Marin. Iterative cluster analysis of protein interaction data Bioinformatics, 21:364-378, 2005.
7. D. Auerbach, S. Thaminy, M. O. Hottiger, and I. Stagljar. Post-yeast-two hybrid era of interactive proteomics: facts and perspectives Proteomics, 2:611-623, 2002.
8. G. D. Bader and C. W. Hogue. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinf., 4:2, 2003.
9. A. L. Barabasi and Z. N. Oltvai. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev., 5:101-113, 2004.
10. K. Beyer, J. Goldstein, R. Ramakrishnan, and U. Shaft. When is ''nearest neighbor'' meaningful? In Proc. 7th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), 1999.
11. M. Blatt, S. Wiseman, and E. Domany. Superparamagnetic clustering of data. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:3251-3254, 1996.
12. D. H. Blohm and A. Guiseppi-Elie. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 12:41-47, 2001.
13. D. Bu, Y. Zhao, L. Cai, H. Xue, X. Zhu, et al. Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res., 31:2443-2450, 2003.
14. F. Chung and L. Lu. The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99:15879-15882, 2002.
15. R. Cohen and S. Havlin. Scale-free networks are ultra small. Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:058701, 2003.
16. T. P. Conrads, H. J. Issaq, and T. D. Veenstra. New tools for quantitative phosphoproteome analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 290:885-890, 2002.
17. T. Dandekar. et al. Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci., 23:324-328, 1998.
18. M. Deng, F. Sun, and T. Chen. Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., pp. 140-151, 2003.
19. B. L. Drees. Progress and variations in two-hybrid and three-hybrid technologies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3:64-70, 1999.
20. M. B. Eisen, P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95:14863-14868, 1998.
21. A. J. Enright, S. van Dongen, and C. A. Ouzounis. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res., 30:1575-1584, 2002.
22. D. A. Fell and A. Wagner. The small world of metabolism. Nat. Biotechnol., 18: 1121-1122, 2000.
23. S. Fields and O. Song. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature, 340(6230):245-246, 1989.
24. M. Fransen, C. Brees, K. Ghys, L. Amery, et al. Mol. Cell Proteom., 2:611-623, 2002.
25. A. C. Gavin, et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415:141-147, 2002.
26. H. Ge. Nucleic Acids Res., 28:1-7, 2000.
27. G. Getz, E. Levine, and E. Domany. Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 97:12079-12084, 2000.
28. G. Getz, M. Vendruscolo, D. Sachs, and E. Domany. Automated assignment of SCOP and CATH protein structure classifications from FSSP scores. Proteins, 46:405-415, 2002.
29. L. Giot, et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 302: 1727-1736, 2003.
30. G. Glazko, A. Gordon, and A. Mushegian. The choice of optimal distance measure in genome-wide data sets. 2005.
31. F. Glover. Tabu search. ORSA J. Comput., 1:190-206, 1989.
32. D. S. Goldberg and F. P. Roth. Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100:4372-4376, 2003.
33. E. Hartuv and R. A. Shamir. Clustering algorithm based graph connectivity. Inf. Process. Lett., 76:175-181, 2000.
34. L. H. Hartwell, J. J. Hopfield, S. Leibler, and A.W. Murray. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402:C47-C52, 1999.
35. Y. Ho et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415:180-183, 2002.
36. T. Ito, T. Chiba, R. Ozawa, M. Yoshida, et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98:4569-4574, 2001.
37. T. Ito, K. Ota, H. Kubota, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Chiba, K. Sakuraba, and M. Yoshida. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell Proteom., 1:561-566, 2002.
38. A. Jain, M. Murty, and P. Flynn. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv., 31: 264-323, 1999.
39. R. A. Jansen et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science, 302:449-453, 2003.
40. R. Jansen et al. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res., 12:37-46, 2002.
41. H. Jeong, S. P. Mason, A.-L. Barabási, and Z. N. Oltvai. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 411:41-42, 2001.
42. D. Jiang, C. Tang, and A. Zhang. Cluster analysis for gene expression data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., 16:1370-1386, 2004.
43. N. Johnsson and A. Varshavsky. Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 91:10340-10344, 1994.
44. S. Jones and J. M. Thornton. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93:13-20, 1996.
45. A. D. King, N. Przulj, and I. Jurisica. Protein complex prediction via cost-based clustering. Bioinformatics, 20:3013-3020, 2004.
46. E. V. Koonin, Y. I.Wolf, and G. P. Karev. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature, 420:218-223, 2002.
47. J. O. Korbel, B. Snel, M. A. Huynen, and P. Bork. SHOT: aWeb server for the construction of genome phylogenies. Trends Genet., 18:159-162, 2002.
48. R. Krause, C. von Mering, and P. Bork. A comprehensive set of protein complexes in yeast: mining large scale protein-protein interaction screens. Bioinformatics, 19:1901-1908, 2003.
49. A. Kumar and M. Snyder. Protein complexes take the bait. Nature, 415:123-124, 2002.
50. B. Kuster, P. Mortensen, J. S. Andersen, and M. Mann. Mass spectrometry allows direct identification of proteins in large genomes. Protemics, 1:641-650, 2001.
51. E. Lasonder et al. Analysis of the Plasmodium falciparum proteome by high-accuracy mass spectrometry. Nature, 419:537-542, 2002.
52. J. Lebowitz, M. S. Lewis, and P. Schuck. Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: a tutorial review. Protein Sci., 11:2067-2079, 2002.
53. S. Li et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan. Science, 303:540-543, 2004.
54. G. MacBeath and S. L. Schreiber. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science, 289:1760-1763, 2000.
55. M. Mann et al. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol., 20:261-268, 2002.
56. M. Mann and O. N. Jensen. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol., 21:255-261, 2003.
57. E. M. Marcotte et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 285:751-753, 1999.
58. E. M. Marcotte et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Nature, 402:83-86, 1999.
59. S. Maslov and K. Sneppen. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science, 296:910-913, 2002.
60. H. W. Mewes et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 32:D41-D44, 2004.
61. S. Milgram. The small world problem. Psychol. Today, 2:60, 1967.
62. B. Mirkin and E. V. Koonin. A top-down method for building genome classification trees with linear binary hierarchies. Bioconsensus, 61:97-112, 2003.
63. M. E. Newman. Network construction and fundamental results. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98:404-409, 2001.
64. I. M. A. Nooren and J. M. Thornton. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J., 22:3486-3492, 2003.
65. Y. Ofran and B. Rost. Analyzing six types of protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol., 325:377-387, 2003.
66. D. E. Otzen and A. R. Fersht. Analysis of protein-protein interactions by mutagenesis: direct versus indirect effects. Protein Eng., 12:41-45, 1999.
67. T. Oyama et al. Extraction of knowledge on protein-protein interaction by association rule discovery. Bioinformatics, 18:705-714, 2002.
68. S. D. Patterson and R. H. Aebersold. Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nat. Genet., 33:311-323, 2003.
69. P. Pei and A. Zhang. A topological measurement for weighted protein interaction network. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference (CSB'05), pp. 268-278, 2005.
70. P. Pei and A. Zhang. A two-step approach for clustering proteins based on protein interaction profile. In Proc. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE'05), pp. 201-209, 2005.
71. M. Pellegrini et al. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96:4285-4288, 1999.
72. J. Peng, J. E. Elias, C. C. Thoreen, L. J. Licklider, and S. P. Gygi. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res., 10:1021, 2002.
73. J. B. Pereira-Leal, A. J. Enright, and C. A. Ouzounis. Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 54:49-57, 2004.
74. E. M. Phizicky and S. Fields. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol. Rev., 59:94-123, 1995
75. A.W. Rives and T. Galitski. Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100(3):1128-33, 2003.
76. M. P. Samanta and S. Liang. Redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100:12579-12583, 2003.
77. M. Sigman and G. A. Cecchi. Global organization of the WordNet lexicon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99:1742-1747, 2002.
78. R. V. Sole, R. Pastor-Satorras, E. Smith, and T. B. Kepler. A model of large-scale proteome evolution. Adv. Complex Syst., 5:43-54, 2002.
79. F. Spinozzi, D. Gazzillo. A. Giacometti, P. Mariani, and F. Carsughi. Interaction of proteins in solution from small angle scattering: a perturbative approach. J. Biophys., 82:2165-2175, 2002.
80. V. Spirin and L. A. Mirny. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100:12123-12128, 2003.
81. S. Tavazoie, D. Hughes, M. J. Campbell, R. J. Cho, and G. M. Church. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nat. Genet., pp. 281-185, 1999.
82. S. Van Dongen. A new cluster algorithm for graphs. Technical Report INS-R0010. Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000.
83. S. Van Dongen. Performance criteria for graph clustering and markov cluster experiments. Technical Report INS-R0012. Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI). Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000.
84. A. V. Veselovsky, Y. D. Ivanov, A. S. Ivanov, and A. I. J. Archakov. Protein-protein interactions: mechanisms and modification by drugs. Mol. Recognit., 15:405-422, 2002.
85. M. Vidal. The Two-Hybrid System, p. 109. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.
86. C. von Mering, R. Krause, B. Snel, M. Cornell, and S. G. Oliver. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417:399-403, 2002.
87. A. Wagner. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 18:1283-1292, 2001.
88. A. Wagner. How the global structure of protein interaction networks evolves. Proc. R. Soc. London, 270:457-466, 2003.
89. M. P.Washburn, D. Wolters, and J. R. Yates. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol., 19:242-247, 2001.
90. D. J. Watts. Small Worlds, p. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999.
91. M. Yanagida. Functional proteomics: current achievements. J. Chromatogr. B, 771: 89-106, 2002.
92. B. Zhang, B. Kraemer, S. SenGupta, S. Fields, and M.Wickens. Yeast three-hybrid system to detect and analyze interactions between RNA and protein. Methods Enzymol., 306: 93-113, 1999.
93. H. Zhou. Distance, dissimilarity index, and network community structure. Phys. Rev., E67:061901, 2003.
94. H. Zhou. Network landscape from a Brownian particle's perspective. Phys. Rev., E67:041908, 2003.
95. H. Zhu, M. Bilgin, R. Bangham, D. Hall. et al. Science, 293:2101-2105, 2001.
96. H. Zhu, M. Bilgin, and M. Snyder. Proteomics. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 72:783-812, 2003.