Genome sequencing and population genomics in non-model organisms

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 51-63

  Ellegren, Hans ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Ecological genomics; Evolutionary genomics; Genome sequencing; Molecular evolution; Population genomics; Positive selection; Speciation genetics

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); IDENTIFICATION KEY; LIFE SCIENCE;

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; DNA SEQUENCE; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOME SEQUENCE; METAGENOMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENOMICS; POSITIVE SELECTION; REVIEW; SPECIATION GENETICS;

ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL GENOMICS; EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS; GENOME SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENOMICS; POSITIVE SELECTION; SPECIATION GENETICS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EUKARYOTA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; METAGENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84888274008     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.008     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Bennetzen J.L., et al. Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:555-561.
2. Brenchley R., et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491:705-710.
3. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 2012, 487:94-98. Heliconius Genome Sequencing Consortium.
4. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485:635-641. Tomato Genome Consortium.
5. Ellegren H., et al. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 2012, 491:756-760.
6. Guo S., et al. The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:51-58.
7. Jones F.C., et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 2012, 484:55-61.
8. Prufer K., et al. The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes. Nature 2012, 486:527-531.
9. Qiu Q., et al. The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:946-949.
10. Simakov O., et al. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 2013, 493:526-531.
11. You M., et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:220-225.
12. Zhang G., et al. Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science 2013, 339:456-460.
13. Zhang G., et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 2012, 490:49-54.
14. Shapiro M.D., et al. Genomic diversity and evolution of the head crest in the rock pigeon. Science 2013, 339:1063-1067.
15. Hu T.T., et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:476-481.
16. ICGSC Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004, 432:695-716.
17. Warren W.C., et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature 2010, 464:757-762.
18. Dalloul R.A., et al. Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000475.
19. Rands C., et al. Insights into the evolution of Darwin's finches from comparative analysis of the Geospiza magnirostris genome sequence. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:95.
20. Zhang G., et al. The genome of Darwin's finch (Geospiza fortis). GigaDB 2012, 10.5524/100040.
21. Cai Q., et al. The genome sequence of the ground tit Pseudopodoces humilis provides insights into its adaptation to high altitude. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R29.
22. Oleksyk T., et al. A locally funded Puerto Rican parrot (Amazona vittata) genome sequencing project increases avian data and advances young researcher education. Gigascience 2012, 1:14.
23. Zhan X., et al. Peregrine and saker falcon genome sequences provide insights into evolution of a predatory lifestyle. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:563-566.
24. Koren S., et al. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:693-700.
25. Tortereau F., et al. A high density recombination map of the pig reveals a correlation between sex-specific recombination and GC content. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:586.
26. Smukowski C.S., Noor M.A.F. Recombination rate variation in closely related species. Heredity 2011, 107:496-508.
27. Duret L., Galtier N. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2009, 10:285-311.
28. Lartillot N. Phylogenetic patterns of GC-biased gene conversion in placental mammals and the evolutionary dynamics of recombination landscapes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:489-502.
29. Romiguier J., et al. Contrasting GC-content dynamics across 33 mammalian genomes: relationship with life-history traits and chromosome sizes. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1001-1009.
30. Ellegren H. Evolutionary stasis: the stable chromosomes of birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:283-291.
31. Mugal C.F., et al. Twisted signatures of GC-biased gene conversion embedded in an evolutionary stable karyotype. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1700-1712.
32. Webster M.T., Hurst L.D. Direct and indirect consequences of meiotic recombination: implications for genome evolution. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:101-109.
33. Dunham I., et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012, 489:57-74.
34. Graur D., et al. On the immortality of television sets: "Function" in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5:578-590.
35. Bergman C.M., Kreitman M. Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences. Genome Res. 2001, 11:1335-1345.
36. Hupalo D., Kern A.D. Conservation and functional element discovery in 20 angiosperm plant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1729-1744.
37. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication 1970, Springer-Verlag.
38. Zhang L., Li W-H. Human SNPs reveal no evidence of frequent positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:2504-2507.
39. Gossmann T.I., et al. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:1822-1832.
40. Smith N.G.C., Eyre-Walker A. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 2002, 415:1022-1024.
41. Gossmann T.I., et al. The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2012, 4:658-667.
42. Lourenco J.o.M., et al. The rate of molecular adaptation in a changing environment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1292-1301.
43. Black W.C., et al. Population genomics: genome-wide sampling of insect populations. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2001, 46:441-469.
44. Luikart G., et al. The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:981-994.
45. Begun D.J., et al. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e310.
46. Davey J.W., et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:499-510.
47. Narum S.R., et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing in ecological and conservation genomics. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:2841-2847.
48. Li Y., et al. Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-synonymous coding variants. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:969-972.
49. Nuzhdin S.V., et al. Genotype-phenotype mapping in a post-GWAS world. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:421-426.
50. Buerkle C.A., et al. The n=1 constraint in population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:1575-1581.
51. Boitard S., et al. Detecting selective sweeps from pooled next-generation sequencing samples. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:2177-2186.
52. Cheng C.D., et al. Ecological genomics of Anopheles gambiae along a latitudinal cline: a population-resequencing approach. Genetics 2012, 190:1417-1432.
53. DePristo M.A., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:491-498.
54. Le S.Q., Durbin R. SNP detection and genotyping from low-coverage sequencing data on multiple diploid samples. Genome Res. 2011, 21:952-960.
55. Altman A., et al. A beginners guide to SNP calling from high-throughput DNA-sequencing data. Hum. Genet. 2012, 131:1541-1554.
56. Nielsen R., et al. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:443-451.
57. Nielsen R., et al. SNP calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from new-generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e37558.
58. Wang Y., et al. An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data. Genome Res. 2013, 23:833-842.
59. Zhao S., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of giant pandas provides insights into demographic history and local adaptation. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:67-71.
60. Varshney R.K., et al. Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:240-246.
61. Schlötterer C. A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps. Genetics 2002, 160:753-763.
62. Groenen M.A.M., et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 2012, 491:393-398.
63. Rubin C-J., et al. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:19529-19536.
64. Axelsson E., et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 2013, 495:360-364.
65. Larkin D.M., et al. Whole-genome resequencing of two elite sires for the detection of haplotypes under selection in dairy cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:7693-7698.
66. Jiao Y., et al. Genome-wide genetic changes during modern breeding of maize. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:812-815.
67. Hufford M.B., et al. Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:808-811.
68. Huang X., et al. A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 2012, 490:497-501.
69. Kim Y., Stephan W. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 2002, 160:765-777.
70. Nielsen R., et al. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res. 2005, 15:1566-1575.
71. Emond M.J., et al. Exome sequencing of extreme phenotypes identifies DCTN4 as a modifier of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:886-889.
72. Sousa V., Hey J. Understanding the origin of species with genome-scale data: modelling gene flow. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:404-414.
73. Gutenkunst R.N., et al. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000695.
74. Beaumont M.A. Approximate Bayesian Computation in evolution and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 41:379-406.
75. Locke D.P., et al. Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes. Nature 2011, 469:529-533.
76. Li H., Durbin R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 2011, 475:493-496.
77. Miller W., et al. Polar and brown bear genomes reveal ancient admixture and demographic footprints of past climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:382-390.
78. Nadachowska-Brzyska K., et al. Demographic divergence history of pied flycatcher and collared flycatcher inferred from whole-genome re-sequencing data. PLoS Genet. 2013, (in press).
79. Sheehan S., et al. Estimating variable effective population sizes from multiple genomes: a sequentially Markov conditional sampling distribution approach. Genetics 2013, 194:647-662.
80. Feder J.L., et al. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:342-350.
81. Nosil P., Feder J.L. Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:332-342.
82. Keller I., et al. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:2848-2863.
83. Parchman T.L., et al. The genomic consequences of adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation between species of manakins. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:3304-3317.
84. Floudas D., et al. The Paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 2012, 336:1715-1719.
85. Scally A., et al. Insights into hominid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature 2012, 483:169-175.
86. Jia J., et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 2013, 496:91-95.
87. Nystedt B., et al. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 2013, 497:579-584.
88. Dong Y., et al. Sequencing and automated whole-genome optical mapping of the genome of a domestic goat (Capra hircus). Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:135-141.
89. Kim J., et al. Reference-assisted chromosome assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:1785-1790.
90. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1586-1591.
91. McDonald J.H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 1991, 351:652-654.
92. Rand D.M., Kann L.M. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:735-748.
93. Stoletzki N., Eyre-Walker A. Estimation of the neutrality index. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:63-70.
94. Fan Y., et al. Genome of the Chinese tree shrew. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1426.
95. Alfoldi J., et al. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 2011, 477:587-591.
96. Wang Z., et al. The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:701-706.
97. Chiari Y., et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria). BMC Biol. 2012, 10:65.
98. Amemiya C.T., et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 2013, 496:311-316.
99. Smith J.J., et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:415-421.
100. Schartl M., et al. The genome of the platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and several complex traits. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:567-572.
101. Zhan S., et al. The Monarch butterfly genome yields insights into long-distance migration. Cell 2011, 147:1171-1185.
102. Tsai I.J., et al. The genomes of four tapeworm species reveal adaptations to parasitism. Nature 2013, 496:57-63.
103. Consortium P.G.S. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011, 475:189-195.
104. Paterson A.H., et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature 2012, 492:423-427.
105. Wang K., et al. The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:1098-1103.
106. Xu Q., et al. The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:59-66.
107. Verde I., et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:487-494.
108. Wu H-J., et al. Insights into salt tolerance from the genome of Thellungiella salsuginea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:12219-12224.