The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution

Nature Genetics

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 487-494

  Verde, Ignazio ^a   Abbott, Albert G ^b,c   Scalabrin, Simone ^d   Jung, Sook ^e   Shu, Shengqiang ^f   Marroni, Fabio ^d,g   Zhebentyayeva, Tatyana ^b   Dettori, Maria Teresa ^a   Grimwood, Jane ^f,h   Cattonaro, Federica ^d   Zuccolo, Andrea ^d,i   Rossini, Laura ^j,k   Jenkins, Jerry ^f,h   Vendramin, Elisa ^a   Meisel, Lee A ^l,m   Decroocq, Veronique ^c   Sosinski, Bryon ⁿ   Prochnik, Simon ^f   Mitros, Therese ^o   Policriti, Alberto ^d,g   Cipriani, Guido ^a,g   Dondini, Luca ^p   Ficklin, Stephen ^e   Goodstein, David M ^f   Xuan, Pengfei ^q   Del Fabbro, Cristian ^d   Aramini, Valeria ^a   Copetti, Dario ^d   Gonzalez, Susana ^m   Horner, David S ^k   Falchi, Rachele ^g   Lucas, Susan ^f   Mica, Erica ⁱ   Maldonado, Jonathan ^l   Lazzari, Barbara ^j   Bielenberg, Douglas ^b   Pirona, Raul ^j   Miculan, Mara ^d   Barakat, Abdelali ^b   Testolin, Raffaele ^d,g   Stella, Alessandra ^j,r   Tartarini, Stefano ^p   Tonutti, Pietro ⁱ   Arús, Pere ^s   Orellana, Ariel ^m   Wells, Christina ^b   Main, Dorrie ^e   Vizzotto, Giannina ^g   Silva, Herman ^l   Salamini, Francesco ^j,t   Schmutz, Jeremy ^f,h   Morgante, Michele ^d,g   Rokhsar, Daniel S ^f,o   more..

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^d Istituto di Genomica Applicata (IGA)   (Italy)

^e WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^h HUDSONALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY   (United States)

ⁱ SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^j PARCO TECNOLOGICO PADANO   (Italy)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^m UNIVERSIDAD ANDRÉS BELLO   (Chile)

ⁿ NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^q AMRL   (United States)

^r CNR   (Italy)

^s UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^t RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 4; DOMESTICATION; ECOTYPE; EVOLUTION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME SIZE; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HEXAPLOIDY; NONHUMAN; PEACH; PHYLOGENY; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RETROPOSON; RNA SEQUENCE;

AGRICULTURE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMERS; PROPANOLS; PRUNUS;

FRAGARIA; PRUNUS; PRUNUS PERSICA; ROSACEAE; RUBUS; VITACEAE;

EID: 84878553926     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2586     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Faust, M. & Timon, B. Origin and dissemination of peach. Hortic. Rev. (Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.) 17, 331-379 (1995).
2. Shulaev, V. et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat. Genet. 43, 109-116 (2011).
3. Debener, T. & Linde, M. Exploring complex ornamental genomes: the rose as a model plant. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 28, 267-280 (2009).
4. Meng, R. & Finn, C. Determining ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in Rubus by flow cytometry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127, 767-775 (2002).
5. Arumuganathan, K. & Earle, E.D. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9, 208-218 (1991).
6. Jaffe, D.B. et al. Whole-genome sequence assembly for mammalian genomes: Arachne 2. Genome Res. 13, 91-96 (2003).
7. Howad, W. et al. Mapping with a few plants: using selective mapping for microsatellite saturation of the Prunus reference map. Genetics 171, 1305-1309 (2005).
8. Chain, P.S.G. et al. Genome project standards in a new era of sequencing. Science 326, 236-237 (2009).
9. Velasco, R. et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 42, 833-839 (2010).
10. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815 (2000).
11. SanMiguel, P., Gaut, B.S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y. & Bennetzen, J.L. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nat. Genet. 20, 43-45 (1998).
12. Tuskan, G.A. et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313, 1596-1604 (2006).
13. Jaillon, O. et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463-467 (2007).
14. Barakat, A. et al. Genome wide identification and characterization of cold responsive microRNAs and siRNAs in Prunus persica by high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genomics 13, 481 (2012).
15. Bieleski, R.L. Sugar alcohols. in Plant carbohydrates I-Intracellular carbohydrates. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series 13A. (eds. Pirson, A. & Zimmermann, M.H.) 185-192 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982).
16. Moing, A., Carbonne, F., Zipperlin, B., Svanella, L. & Gaudillere, J.P. Phloem loading in peach: symplastic or apoplatic? Physiol. Plant. 101, 489-496 (1997).
17. Klages, K., Donnison, H., Wünsche, J. & Boldingh, H. Diurnal changes in non-structural carbohydrates in leaves, phloem exudate and fruit in 'Braeburn' apple. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28, 131-139 (2001).
18. Potter, D. et al. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 266, 5-43 (2007).
19. Wallaart, R.A. M. Distribution of sorbitol in Rosaceae. Phytochemistry 19, 2603-2610 (1980).
20. Fait, A. et al. Reconfiguration of the achene and receptacle metabolic networks during strawberry fruit development. Plant Physiol. 148, 730-750 (2008).
21. Hancock, J.F. Strawberry. in Temperate Fruit Crops in Warm Climates (ed. Erez, A.) Ch. 17, 445-455 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000)
22. Watari, J. et al. Identification of sorbitol transporters expressed in the phloem of apple source leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 1032-1041 (2004).
23. Gao, Z. et al. Cloning, expression, and characterization of sorbitol transporters from developing sour cherry fruit and leaf sink tissues. Plant Physiol. 131, 1566-1575 (2003).
24. Loescher, W.H. et al. Sorbitol metabolism and sink-source interconversions in developing apple leaves. Plant Physiol. 70, 335-339 (1982).
25. Lo Bianco, R., Rieger, M. & Sung, S.S. Carbohydrate metabolism of vegetative and reproductive sinks in the late-maturing peach cultivar 'Encore'. Tree Physiol. 19, 103-109 (1999).
26. Cannon, S.B. et al. Diversity, distribution, and ancient taxonomic relationships within the TIR and non-TIR NBS-LRR resistance gene subfamilies. J. Mol. Evol. 54, 548-562 (2002).
27. McHale, L., Tan, X., Koehl, P. & Michelmore, R.W. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: adaptable guards. Genome Biol. 7, 212 (2006).
28. Xing, Y., Frei, U., Schejbel, B., Asp, T. & Lübberstedt, T. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in 11 expressed resistance candidate genes in Lolium perenne. BMC Plant Biol. 7, 43 (2007).
29. Eduardo, I. et al. QTL analysis of fruit quality traits in two peach intraspecific populations and importance of maturity date pleiotropic effect. Tree Genet. Genomes 7, 323-335 (2011).
30. Dirlewanger, E. et al. Comparison of the genetic determinism of two key phenological traits, flowering and maturity dates, in three Prunus species: peach, apricot and sweet cherry. Heredity 109, 280-292 (2012).
31. Yoon, J. et al. Genetic diversity and ecogeographical phylogenetic relationships among peach and nectarine cultivars based on simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 131, 513-521 (2006).
32. Okie, W.R. & Rieger, M. Inheritance of venation pattern in Prunus ferganensis × persica hybrids. Acta Hortic. 622, 261-263 (2003).
33. Branca, A. et al. Whole-genome nucleotide diversity, recombination, and linkage disequilibrium in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E864-E870 (2011).
34. Cao, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat. Genet. 43, 956-963 (2011).
35. Quilot, B. et al. QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced backcross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 884-897 (2004).
36. Cantín, C.M. et al. Chilling injury susceptibility in an intra-specific peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] progeny. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 58, 79-87 (2010).
37. Chaw, S.M., Chang, C.C., Chen, H.L. & Li, W.H. Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 424-441 (2004).
38. Tang, H. et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science 320, 486-488 (2008).
39. Haas, B.J., Delcher, A.L., Wortman, J.R. & Salzberg, S.L. DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics 20, 3643-3646 (2004).
40. Dewey, C.N. Aligning multiple whole genomes with Mercator and MAVID. Methods Mol. Biol. 395, 221-236 (2007).
41. Jung, S. et al. Whole genome comparisons of Fragaria, Prunus and Malus reveal different modes of evolution between Rosaceous subfamilies. BMC Genomics 13, 129 (2012).
42. Lam, H.M. et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat. Genet. 42, 1053-1059 (2010).
43. Scorza, R., Mehlenbacher, S.A. & Lightner, G.W. Inbreeding and coancestry of freestone peach cultivars of the eastern United States and implications for peach germplasm improvement. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 110, 547-552 (1985)
44. Schuler, G.D. Sequence mapping by electronic PCR. Genome Res. 7, 541-550 (1997).
45. Salamov, A.A. & Solovyev, V.V. Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 10, 516-522 (2000).
46. Yeh, R.F., Lim, L.P. & Burge, C.B. Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome. Genome Res. 11, 803-816 (2001).
47. Haas, B.J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654-5666 (2003).
48. Price, A.L., Jones, N.C. & Pevzner, P.A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, i351-i358 (2005).
49. Li, R. et al. ReAS: recovery of ancestral sequences for transposable elements from the unassembled reads of a whole genome shotgun. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e43 (2005).
50. Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTRFINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265-W268 (2007).
51. Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467 (2005).
52. Vezzi, F., Del Fabbro, C., Tomescu, A.I. & Policriti, A. rNA: a fast and accurate short reads numerical aligner. Bioinformatics 28, 123-124 (2012).
53. Lowe, T.M. & Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955-964 (1997).
54. Nawrocki, E.P., Kolbe, D.L. & Eddy, S.R. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25, 1335-1337 (2009).
55. Griffiths-Jones, S. et al. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (suppl. 1), D121-D124 (2005).
56. Nei, M. & Li, W.H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5269 (1979).
57. Watterson, G.A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7, 256-276 (1975).
58. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585-595 (1989).
59. Hill, W.G. & Weir, B.S. Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 33, 54-78 (1988).
60. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012).
61. Lyons, E., Pedersen, B., Kane, J. & Freeling, M. The value of nonmodel genomes and an example using SynMap within CoGe to dissect the hexaploidy that predates the rosids. Tropical Plant. Biol. 1, 181-190 (2008).
62. Schwartz, S. et al. Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res. 13, 103-107 (2003).
63. Hirsh, A.E. & Fraser, H.B. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411, 1046-1049 (2001).
64. Kent, W.J. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12, 656-664 (2002).
65. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639-1645 (2009).
66. Tang, H. et al. Unraveling ancient hexaploidy through multiply-aligned angiosperm gene maps. Genome Res. 18, 1944-1954 (2008).