Theory Development and Application in Medical Education

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Cianciolo, Anna T ^a   Eva, Kevin W ^b   Colliver, Jerry A ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

theory application; theory development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 84888048534     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842907     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Colliver, JA. 1999. Constructivism with a dose of pragmatism: A cure for what ails educational research. Advances in Health Science Education, 4: 187 - 90.
2. Colliver, JA. 2004. Full-curriculum interventions and small-scale studies of transferImplications for psychology-type theory. Medical Education, 38: 1212 - 18.
3. Yeager, D S and Walton, GM. 2011. Social-psychological interventions in education: They're not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81: 267 - 301.
4. Regehr, G. 2010. It's NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44: 31 - 9.
5. Colliver, JA. 2002. Educational theory and medical education practice: A cautionary note for medical school faculty. Academic Medicine, 77: 1217 - 20.
6. Colliver, J A, Conlee, M J and Verhulst, SJ. 2012. From test validity to construct validity and back?. Medical Education, 46: 366 - 71.
7. Rees, C E and Monrouxe, LV. 2010. Theory in medical education research: How do we get there?. Medical Education, 44: 334 - 9.
8. Reeves, S, Mathieu, A, Kuper, A and Hodges, BD. 2008. Why use theories in qualitative research?. British Medical Journal, 337: 631 - 4.
9. Albert, M, Hodges, B and Regehr, G. 2007. Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 12: 103 - 15.
10. Cook, D A, Beckman, T J and Bordage, G. 2007. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: A systematic review. Medical Education, 41: 737 - 45.
11. Markert, RJ. 2013. Enhancing medical education by improving statistical methodology in journal articles. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2592: 159 - 64.
12. Rogers, DA. 2011. Advancing surgical education scholarship. American Journal of Surgery, 201: 1 - 6.
13. Bordage, G. 2009. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Medical Education, 43: 312 - 9.
14. Rotgans, JI. 2012. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988-2010: Content analysis of abstracts from six journals. Advances in Health Science Education, 17: 515 - 7.
15. Schmidt, H G, Rotgans, J I and Yew, EH. 2011. The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45: 792 - 806.
16. Durning, S J, Artino, A R Jr, Schuwirth, L and van der Vleuten, C. 2013. Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine, 88 (4): 1 - 7.
17. Eva, KW. 2012. The State of the Science 2012: Building blocks for the future. Medical Education, 46: 1 - 2.
18. Bunniss, S and Kelly, DR. 2010. Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education, 44: 358 - 66.
19. Eva, KW. 2012. Dialogue in medical education: Enabling the academic voyeur that lurks inside us all. Medical Education, 46: 826 - 7.
20. Colliver, JA. 2002. Commentary on "Review Criteria for Research Manuscripts.". Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14: 75 - 6.
21. Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS. 1994. " Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research ". In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N K and Lincoln, Y S. 1 - 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Giacomini, M. 2010. " Theory matters in qualitative research ". In The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research, Edited by: Bourgeault, I, Dingwall, R and Vries, R De. 125 - 156. Los Angeles: Sage.
23. Gould, SJ. 1996. The mismeasure of man. Rev. ed., New York: W. W. Norton.
24. Teherani, A, Hodgson, C, Banach, M and Papadakis, M. 2005. Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Academic Medicine, 80 (10 SUPPL.): 17 - 20.
25. Ginsburg, S, Bernabeo, E, Ross, K M and Holmboe, E S. 2012. "It depends": Results of a qualitative study investigating how practicing internists approach professional dilemmas. Academic Medicine, 87: 1685 - 93.
26. Norman, G. 2011. Fifty years of medical education research: Waves of migration. Medical Education, 45: 785 - 91.
27. Erduran, S, Simon, S and Osborne, J. 2004. Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88: 915 - 33.
28. Kuhn, D. 2010. Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94: 810 - 24.
29. Duschl, RA. 2008. " Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria ". In Argumentation in science education, Edited by: Erduran, S and Jiménez-Aleixandre, M P. 159 - 75. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Toulmin, SE. 1958. The uses of argument., Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Betancourt, J R, Carrillo, J E and Green, AR. 1999. Hypertension in multicultural and minority populations: Linking communication to compliance. Current Hypertension Reports, 1: 482 - 8.
32. Eva, KW. 2008. On the limits of systematicity. Medical Education, 42: 852 - 3.
33. Eva, K W and Hodges, BD. 2012. Scylla or Charybdis? Can we navigate between objectification and judgement in assessment?. Medical Education, 46: 914 - 9.
34. Nussbaum, E M and Schraw, G. 2007. Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. Journal of Experimental Education, 76: 59 - 92.
35. Eva, K W and Lingard, L. 2008. What's next? A guiding question for educators engaged in educational research. Medical Education, 42: 752 - 4.
36. Chapanis, A. 1967. The relevance of laboratory studies to practical situations. Ergonomics, 10: 557 - 77.
37. Eva, KW. 2009. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Medical Education, 43: 294 - 6.
38. O'Sullivan, P S, Stoddard, H A and Kalishman, S. 2010. Collaborative research in medical education: A discussion of theory and practice. Medical Education, 44: 1175 - 84.
39. Eva, KW. 2009. The reviewer is always right: Peer review of research in medical education. Medical Education, 43: 2 - 4.