Optimizing small group discourse in classrooms: Effective practices and theoretical constraints

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 107-115

  Howe, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classroom discourse; Science; Small group

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888047804     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alexander R. Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education 2001, Blackwell, Oxford.
2. Alexopoulou E., Driver R. Gender differences in small group discussion in physics. International Journal of Science Education 1997, 19:393-406.
3. Ash D. Thematic continuities: Talking and thinking about adaptation in a socially complex classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45:1-30.
4. Association for Science Education Primary Science Review 2004, 83.
5. Baines E., Blatchford P., Kutnick P. Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research 2003, 39:9-34.
6. Bakhtin M. The dialogic imagination: Four essays 1981, University of Texas Press, Austin.
7. Bennett J., Hogarth S., Lubben F., Campbell B., Robinson A. Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education 2010, 32:69-95.
8. Blatchford P., Baines E., Rubie-Davies C., Bassett P., Chowne A. The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:750-765.
9. Brown R., Hirst E. Developing an understanding of the mediating role of talk in the elementary mathematics classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction 2007, 42:18-28.
10. Buzzelli C., Johnston B. Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education 2001, 17:873-884.
11. Conwell C., Griffin S., Algozzine B. Gender and racial differences in unstructured learning groups in science. International Journal of Science Education 1993, 15:107-115.
12. Damon W., Killen M. Peer interaction and the process of change in children's moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1982, 28:347-367.
13. Dawes L. Talking and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education 2004, 26:677-695.
14. Department of Education and Science Science in the national curriculum 1989, HMSO, London.
15. Doise W., Mugny G. The social development of the intellect 1984, Pergamon, Oxford.
16. Driver R., Guesne E., Tiberghien A. Children's ideas in science 1985, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
17. Emanuelsson J., Sahlström F. The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2008, 52:205-223.
18. Finkel E.A. Making sense of genetics: Students' knowledge use during problem solving in a high school genetics class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33:345-368.
19. Fisher R., Larkin S. Pedagogy or ideological struggle? An examination of pupils' and teachers' expectations for talk in the classroom. Language and Education 2008, 22:1-16.
20. Franke M.L., Webb N.M., Chan A.G. Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60:380-392.
21. Galton M., Hargreaves L., Pell T. Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education 2009, 39:119-140.
22. Gilbert J.K., Pope M.L. Small group discussions about conceptions in science: A case study. Research in Science and Technological Development 1986, 4:61-76.
23. Guzzetti B.J., Williams W.O. Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33:5-20.
24. Harlen W., Qualter A. The teaching of science in primary schools 2004, David Fulton, London. 4th ed.
25. Herrenkohl L.R., Palincsar A.S., DeWater L.S., Kawasaki K. Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1999, 8:451-493.
26. Hogan K. Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21:855-882.
27. Howe C. Collaborative group work in middle childhood: Joint construction, unresolved contradiction and the growth of knowledge. Human Development 2009, 39:71-94.
28. Howe C. Peer groups and children's development 2010, Blackwell, Oxford.
29. Howe, C., & Abedin, M. Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, in press.
30. Howe C., McWilliam D., Cross G. Chance favours only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology 2005, 96:67-93.
31. Howe C., Rodgers C., Tolmie A. Physics in the primary school: Peer interaction and the understanding of floating and sinking. European Journal of Psychology of Education 1990, V:459-475.
32. Howe C., Tolmie A. Computer support for learning in collaborative contexts: Prompted hypothesis testing in physics. Computers and Education 1998, 3/4:223-235.
33. Howe C., Tolmie A. Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts. International Journal of Educational Research 2003, 39:51-72.
34. Howe C., Tolmie A., Anderson A., Mackenzie M. Conceptual knowledge in physics: The role of group interaction in computer-supported teaching. Learning and Instruction 1992, 2:161-183.
35. Howe C., Tolmie A., Duchak-Tanner V., Rattray C. Hypothesis testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction 2000, 10:361-391.
36. Howe C., Tolmie A., Greer K., Mackenzie M. Peer collaboration and conceptual growth in physics: Task influences on children's understanding of heating and cooling. Cognition and Instruction 1995, 13:483-503.
37. Howe C., Tolmie A., Mackenzie M. Collaborative learning in physics: Some implications for computer design. Computer-supported collaborative learning 1995, 51-68. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. C. O'Malley (Ed.).
38. Howe C., Tolmie A., Rodgers C. The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1992, 10:113-130.
39. Howe C., Tolmie A., Thurston A., Topping K., Christie D., Livingston K., et al. Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:549-563.
40. Jiménez-Aleixandre M.P., Pereiro-Munoz C. Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education 2002, 11:1171-1190.
41. Jiménez-Aleixandre M.P., Rodríguez A.B., Duschl R.A. 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education 2000, 84:757-792.
42. Jones S., Tanner H. Teachers' interpretations of effective whole-class interactive teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies 2002, 28:265-274.
43. Keys C.W. An investigation of the relationship between scientific reasoning, conceptual knowledge and model formation in a naturalistic setting. International Journal of Science Education 1997, 19:957-970.
44. Kurth L.A., Anderson C.W., Palincsar A.S. The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education 2002, 86:287-313.
45. Kutnick P., Ota C., Berdondini L. Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction 2008, 18:83-95.
46. Lajoie S.P., Lavigne N.C., Guerrera G., Munsie S.D. Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science 2001, 29:155-186.
47. Learning and Teaching Scotland Environmental studies: Science 2000, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
48. Matusov E. Bakhtin's dialogic pedagogy. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 2004, 42:3-11.
49. Mercer N., Dawes L., Wegerif R., Sams C. Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal 2004, 30:367-385.
50. Mercer N., Littleton K. Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach 2007, Routledge, London.
51. Meyer K., Woodruff E. Consensually driven exploration in science teaching. Science Education 1997, 81:173-192.
52. Mortimer E.F., Machado A.H. Anomalies and conflicts in classroom discourse. Science Education 2000, 84:429-444.
53. Mugny G., Doise W. Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology 1978, 8:181-192.
54. O'Donnell A., Dansereau D.F. Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning 1992, 120-141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, N. Miller (Eds.).
55. Olitsky S. Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2007, 44:33-56.
56. Osborn M. Constants and contexts in pupil experience of learning and schooling: Comparing learners in England, France and Demark. Comparative Education 2001, 37:267-278.
57. Osborne J., Erduran S., Simon S. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2004, 41:994-1020.
58. Palincsar A.S., Anderson C., David Y.M. Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. The Elementary School Journal 1993, 93:643-658.
59. Perret-Clermont A.-N. Social interaction and cognitive development in children 1980, Academic Press, London.
60. Pierce K.M., Gillies C. From exploratory talk to critical conversations. Exploring talk in schools 2008, 37-53. Sage, London. N. Mercer, S. Hodgkinson (Eds.).
61. Rennie L., Parker L. Detecting and accounting for gender differences in mixed-sex and single-sex groupings in science lessons. Educational Review 1987, 39:65-73.
62. Richmond G., Striley J. Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discussion and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33:839-858.
63. Roth M.-W., McGinn M.K., Woszczyna C., Boutonné S. Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1999, 8:293-347.
64. Roth W.-M., Roychoudhury A. The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education 1992, 76:531-557.
65. Roy A.W.N., Howe C.J. Effects of cognitive conflict, socio-cognitive conflict and imitation on children's socio-legal thinking. European Journal of Social Psychology 1990, 20:241-252.
66. Roychoudhury A., Roth W.-M. Interactions in an open-inquiry physics laboratory. International Journal of Science Education 1996, 18:423-445.
67. Sherman S.J. Cooperative learning and science. Handbook of cooperative learning methods. 1999, 226-244. Praeger, Westport, CT. S. Sharan (Ed.).
68. Tao P.-K. Developing understanding through confronting various views: The case of solving qualitative physics problems. International Journal of Science Education 2001, 23:1201-1218.
69. Tao P.-K. Eliciting and developing junior secondary science students' understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25:147-171.
70. Tolmie, A., Christie, D., Howe, C., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Donaldson, C., et al. (2007). Classroom relations and collaborative groupwork in varying social contexts: Lessons from Scotland. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
71. Tolmie A.K., Howe C.J. Computer-directed group activity and the development of children's hypothesis testing skills. Group and interactive learning 1994, 139-144. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton. H.C. Foot, C.J. Howe, A. Anderson, A.K. Tolmie, D. Warden (Eds.).
72. Tolmie A., Howe C., Mackenzie M., Greer K. Task design as an influence on dialogue and learning: Primary school group work with object flotation. Social Development 1993, 2:183-201.
73. Wood T. Creating a context for argument in mathematics class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1999, 30:171-191.