Progressive Refinement of Hypotheses in Video-Supported Research

Video Research in the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 239-254

  Engle, Randi A ^a   Conant, Faith R ^b   Greeno, James G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Five Colleges Inc ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145845004     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203877258-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Benke, G. (1999, April). The relevance of discourse: A relevance-theoretic approach to learning as discourse practice. In J. G. Greeno, A. L. Brown, & J. C. Campione (Chairs), Cognitive and social-interactional aspects of conceptual growth. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
2. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. P. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467-498.
3. Engle, R. A. (2004, April). Revisiting previous discussions to deepen teachers’ engagement with mathematics and pedagogy. In M. S. Smith (Chair), Developing a knowledge base for teaching: Learning content and pedagogy in a course on patterns and functions. Symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
4. Engle, R. A. (2006a). Engaging a diverse group of stakeholders in innovative curriculum design: The case of the Middle-school Mathematics through Applications Project (1990-2002). Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center. Available at http://www.lrds.pitt.edu/metastudy/pub.htm
5. Engle, R. A. (2006b). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative account of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451-498.
6. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
7. Engle, R. A., & Faux, R. B. (2006). Towards productive disciplinary engagement of beginning teachers in educational psychology: Comparing two methods of case-based instruction. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1(2), 1-22. Available at http://www.coc.uga.edu/tep/pdf_2006/index.html
8. Engle, R. A., & Goldman, S. R. (2006, May). Collaborating to support innovationism theory and practice: The Middle-school Mathematics through Applications Project. Invited talk, 18th annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science, New York, NY.
9. Engle, R. A., & Greeno, J. G. (1994). Managing disagreement in intellectual conversations:Coordinating social and conceptual concerns in the collaborative construction of mathematical explanations. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 266-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Greeno, J. G. (2003). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. Paper presented at the Theorizing Learning Practices conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
11. Greeno, J. G., Benke, G., Engle, R. A., Lachapelle, C., & Wiebe, M. (1998). Considering conceptual growth as change in discourse practices. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 442-447). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Greeno, J. G., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1999, April). Cognitive and social-interactional aspects of conceptual growth. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
13. Greeno, J. G., & Engle, R. A. (1995). Combining analyses of cognitive processes, meanings, and social participation: Understanding symbolic representations. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 591-596). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Greeno, J. G., Engle, R. A., Kerr, L. K., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Understanding symbols: A situativity-theory analysis of constructing mathematical meaning. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 504-509). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gresalfi, M. S., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2005). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Unpublished manuscript.
16. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In D. Lesh & E. Kelley (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Hamm, J. V., & Perry, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in first-grade classrooms:On whose authority? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 126-137.
18. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
20. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension (pp. 320-339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lachapelle, C. (1997). Looking at changes in student understanding using a situation model analysis of discourse. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 978). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M. D. (2005). Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 87-163.
24. Linde, C., Greeno, J. G., Roschelle, J., Brereton, M., Lewis, J., & Stevens, R. (1994, April). Explanations in discourse: Considering explanation as a social process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
25. McMullin, E. (1976). The fertility of theory and the unit for appraisal in science. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend, & M.W.Wartofsky (Eds.), Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos (pp. 395-432). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
26. Nikitina, S. (2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 389-425.
27. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
28. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
29. Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
30. Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61-94.
31. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Hughes, E., & Smith, M. S. (2006). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. Unpublished manuscript.
33. Webster, M., & Conant, F. R. (2003). “It says ‘soap’ now”: Understanding young children’s approaches to text in signs (Tech. Rep.). Pioneer Valley Teacher Research Collaborative, Amherst, MA.
34. Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1985). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Wiebe, M. (1999). Learning as transformation of participation: One student group’s changing practice of doing research. In J. G. Greeno, A. L. Brown, & J. C. Campione, (Chairs). Cognitive and social-interactional aspects of conceptual growth. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
36. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.