Evolution of protein structures and interactions from the perspective of residue contact networks

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 954-963

  Zhang, Xiuwei ^a   Perica, Tina ^b   Teichmann, Sarah A ^a  

^a EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MONOMER;

ALLOSTERISM; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING AFFINITY; COEVOLUTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; INDEL MUTATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; AMINO ACID MOTIFS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84887894373     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Perica T., Marsh J.A., Sousa F.L., Natan E., Colwell L.J., Ahnert S.E., Teichmann S.A. The emergence of protein complexes: quaternary structure, dynamics and allostery. Biochem Soc Trans 2012, 40:475-491.
2. Nooren I.M.A., Thornton J.M. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 2003, 22:3486-3492.
3. Levy E.D. A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. J Mol Biol 2010, 403:660-670.
4. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999, 285:2177-2198.
5. Soundararajan V., Raman R., Raguram S., Sasisekharan V., Sasisekharan R. Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9391.
6. Venkatakrishnan A.J., Deupi X., Lebon G., Tate C.G., Schertler G.F., Babu M.M. Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2013, 494:185-194.
7. Janin J., Bahadur R.P., Chakrabarti P. Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure. Q Rev Biophys 2008, 41:133-180.
8. Mackinnon S.S., Malevanets A., Wodak S.J. Intertwined associations in structures of homooligomeric proteins. Structure 2013, 21:638-649.
9. Dellus-Gur E., Tóth-Petróczy A., Elias M., Tawfik D.S. What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. J Mol Biol 2013, [Internet]. 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.033.
10. Ozbabacan S.E.A., Engin H.B., Gursoy A., Keskin O. Transient protein-protein interactions. Protein Eng Des Sel 2011, 24:635-648.
11. Stein A., Pache R.A., Bernadó P., Pons M., Aloy P. Dynamic interactions of proteins in complex networks: a more structured view. FEBS J 2009, 276:5390-5405.
12. Sun M.G.F., Sikora M., Costanzo M., Boone C., Kim P.M. Network evolution: rewiring and signatures of conservation in signaling. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002411.
13. Neduva V., Russell R.B. Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett 2005, 579:3342-3345.
14. Perkins J.R., Diboun I., Dessailly B.H., Lees J.G., Orengo C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 2010, 18:1233-1243.
15. Clackson T., Wells J.A. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995, 267:383-386.
16. Kastritis P.L., Bonvin A.M.J.J. On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact. J R Soc Interface 2013, 10:20120835.
17. Moreira I.S., Fernandes P.A., Ramos M.J. Hot spots-a review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 2007, 68:803-812.
18. Bogan A., Thorn K. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998, 280:1-9.
19. Hu Z., Ma B., Wolfson H., Nussinov R. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins 2000, 39:331-342.
20. Chakrabarti P., Janin J. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 2002, 47:334-343.
21. Caffrey D.R., Somaroo S., Hughes J.D., Mintseris J., Huang E.S. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?. Protein Sci 2004, 13:190-202.
22. Guharoy M., Chakrabarti P. Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:15447-15452.
23. Mintseris J., Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:10930-10935.
24. Karanicolas J., Corn J.E., Chen I., Joachimiak L.A., Dym O., Peck S.H., Albeck S., Unger T., Hu W., Liu G., et al. A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution. Mol Cell 2011, 42:250-260.
25. Akiva E., Itzhaki Z., Margalit H. Built-in loops allow versatility in domain-domain interactions: lessons from self-interacting domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:13292-13297.
26. Hashimoto K., Panchenko A.R. Mechanisms of protein oligomerization, the critical role of insertions and deletions in maintaining different oligomeric states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:20352-20357.
27. Nishi H., Koike R., Ota M. Cover and spacer insertions: small nonhydrophobic accessories that assist protein oligomerization. Proteins 2011, 79:2372-2379.
28. Kapp G.T., Liu S., Stein A., Wong D.T., Reményi A., Yeh B.J., Fraser J.S., Taunton J., Lim W.A., Kortemme T. Control of protein signaling using a computationally designed GTPase/GEF orthogonal pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:5277-5282.
29. Hardy J.A., Wells J.A. Dissecting an allosteric switch in caspase-7 using chemical and mutational probes. J Biol Chem 2009, 284:26063-26069.
30. Perica T., Chothia C., Teichmann S.A. Evolution of oligomeric state through geometric coupling of protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:8127-8132.
31. Casari G., Sander C., Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1995, 2:171-178.
32. De Juan D., Pazos F., Valencia A. Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2013, 14:249-261.
33. Skerker J.M., Perchuk B.S., Siryaporn A., Lubin E.A., Ashenberg O., Goulian M., Laub M.T. Rewiring the specificity of two-component signal transduction systems. Cell 2008, 133:1043-1054.
34. Halabi N., Rivoire O., Leibler S., Ranganathan R. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 2009, 138:774-786.
35. Lee S.J., Sekimoto T., Yamashita E., Nagoshi E., Nakagawa A., Imamoto N., Yoshimura M., Sakai H., Chong K.T., Tsukihara T., et al. The structure of importin-beta bound to SREBP-2: nuclear import of a transcription factor. Science 2003, 302:1571-1575.
36. Goh C.-S., Milburn D., Gerstein M. Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004, 14:104-109.
37. Goh C.S., Bogan A.A., Joachimiak M., Walther D., Cohen F.E. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J Mol Biol 2000, 299:283-293.
38. Pazos F., Valencia A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng 2001, 14:609-614.
39. Hopf T.A., Colwell L.J., Sheridan R., Rost B., Sander C., Marks D.S. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 2012, 149:1607-1621.
40. Choi S.S., Li W., Lahn B.T. Robust signals of coevolution of interacting residues in mammalian proteomes identified by phylogeny-aided structural analysis. Nat Genet 2005, 37:1367-1371.
41. Weigt M., White R.A., Szurmant H., Hoch J.A., Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:67-72.
42. Reynolds K.A., McLaughlin R.N., Ranganathan R. Hot spots for allosteric regulation on protein surfaces. Cell 2011, 147:1564-1575.
43. Koshland D.E., Némethy G., Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 1966, 5:365-385.
44. Cooper A., Dryden D.T. Allostery without conformational change. A plausible model. Eur Biophys J 1984, 11:103-109.
45. Stacklies W., Xia F., Gräter F. Dynamic allostery in the methionine repressor revealed by force distribution analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000574.
46. Kar G., Keskin O., Gursoy A., Nussinov R. Allostery and population shift in drug discovery. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2010, 10:715-722.
47. Del Sol A., Tsai C.-J., Ma B., Nussinov R. The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. Structure 2009, 17:1042-1050.
48. Tsai C.-J., del Sol A., Nussinov R. Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. J Mol Biol 2008, 378:1-11.
49. Süel G.M., Lockless S.W., Wall M.A., Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:59-69.
50. Capra J.A., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M., Singh M., Funkhouser T.A. Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000585.
51. Alexander P.A., He Y., Chen Y., Orban J., Bryan P.N. A minimal sequence code for switching protein structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:21149-21154.
52. He Y., Chen Y., Alexander P.A., Bryan P.N., Orban J. Mutational tipping points for switching protein folds and functions. Structure 2012, 20:283-291.
53. Goldsmith M., Tawfik D.S. Directed enzyme evolution: beyond the low-hanging fruit. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012, 22:406-412.
54. Alexander P.A., He Y., Chen Y., Orban J., Bryan P.N. The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:11963-11968.
55. Taverna D.M., Goldstein R.A. Why are proteins marginally stable?. Proteins 2002, 46:105-109.
56. Tokuriki N., Tawfik D.S. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:596-604.
57. Bloom J.D., Labthavikul S.T., Otey C.R., Arnold F.H. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:5869-5874.
58. Taverna D.M., Goldstein R.A. Why are proteins so robust to site mutations?. J Mol Biol 2002, 315:479-484.
59. Hall B.G. Simple and accurate estimation of ancestral protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:5431-5436.
60. Williams P.D., Pollock D.D., Blackburne B.P., Goldstein R.A. Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e69.
61. Ortlund E.A., Bridgham J.T., Redinbo M.R., Thornton J.W. Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis. Science 2007, 317:1544-1548.
62. Bridgham J.T., Ortlund E.A., Thornton J.W. An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 2009, 461:515-519.
63. Hobbs J.K., Shepherd C., Saul D.J., Demetras N.J., Haaning S., Monk C.R., Daniel R.M., Arcus V.L. On the origin and evolution of thermophily: reconstruction of functional precambrian enzymes from ancestors of bacillus. Mol Biol Evol 2012, 29:825-835.
64. Gong L.I., Suchard M.A., Bloom J.D. Stability-mediated epistasis constrains the evolution of an influenza protein. Elife 2013, 2:e00631.
65. Lai J., Jin J., Kubelka J., Liberles D.A. A phylogenetic analysis of normal modes evolution in enzymes and its relationship to enzyme function. J Mol Biol 2012, [Internet]. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.05.028.
66. Sasidharan R., Chothia C. The selection of acceptable protein mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:10080-10085.
67. Tóth-Petróczy A., Tawfik D.S. Slow protein evolutionary rates are dictated by surface-core association. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:11151-11156.
68. Levy E.D., De S., Teichmann S.A. Cellular crowding imposes global constraints on the chemistry and evolution of proteomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:20461-20466.
69. Illergård K., Ardell D.H., Elofsson A. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence-a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins 2009, 77:499-508.
70. Larson S.M., England J.L., Desjarlais J.R., Pande V.S. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci 2002, 11:2804-2813.
71. Shakhnovich B.E., Deeds E., Delisi C., Shakhnovich E. Protein structure and evolutionary history determine sequence space topology. Genome Res 2005, 15:385-392.
72. Juritz E., Palopoli N., Fornasari M.S., Fernandez-Alberti S., Parisi G. Protein conformational diversity modulates sequence divergence. Mol Biol Evol 2013, 30:79-87.
73. Friedland G.D., Kortemme T. Designing ensembles in conformational and sequence space to characterize and engineer proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010, 20:377-384.
74. Friedland G.D., Lakomek N.-A., Griesinger C., Meiler J., Kortemme T. A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000393.
75. Echave J. Evolutionary divergence of protein structure: the linearly forced elastic network model. Chem Phys Lett 2008, 457:413-416.
76. Amitai G., Shemesh A., Sitbon E., Shklar M., Netanely D., Venger I., Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 2004, 344:1135-1146.
77. Krishnan A., Zbilut J.P., Tomita M., Giuliani A. Proteins as networks: usefulness of graph theory in protein science. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2008, 9:28-38.
78. Tuncbag N., Salman F.S., Keskin O., Gursoy A. Analysis and network representation of hotspots in protein interfaces using minimum cut trees. Prot: Struct Funct Bioinform 2010, 78:2283-2294.
79. Böde C., Kovács I.A., Szalay M.S., Palotai R., Korcsmáros T., Csermely P. Network analysis of protein dynamics. FEBS Lett 2007, 581:2776-2782.
80. Zhang X., Moret B.M.E. Refining regulatory networks through phylogenetic transfer of information. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2012, 9:1032-1045.
81. Zhang X., Moret B.M.E. Refining transcriptional regulatory networks using network evolutionary models and gene histories. Algorith Mol Biol 2010, 5:1.