Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Soundararajan, Venkataramanan ^a   Raguram, Rahul Raman S ^a   Sasisekharan, V ^a   Sasisekharan, Ram ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN YOPM; SOLVENT; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; INNATE IMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CORE ATOMIC INTERACTION NETWORK; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; YERSINIA PESTIS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); YERSINIA PESTIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 77949609215     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009391     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Choi I-G, Kim S-H (2006) Evolution of protein structural classes and protein sequence families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(38): 14056-14061.
2. Friedberg I, Margalit H (2002) Persistently Conserved Positions in Structurally-Similar, Sequence Dissimilar Proteins: Roles in Preserving Protein Fold and Function. Protein Science 11(2): 350-360.
3. Rumbley J, Hoang L, Mayne L, Walter Englander S (2001) An amino acid code for protein folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(1): 105-112.
4. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006) Structural Determinants of the Rate of Protein Evolution in Yeast. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(9): 1751-1761.
5. Pratt LR, Chandler D (1977) Theory of the hydrophobic effect. J Chem Phys 67: 3683-3704.
6. Kauzmann W (1959) Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem 14: 1-63.
7. Zhou R, Huang X, Margulis CJ, Berne BJ (2004) Hydrophobic Collapse in Multidomain Protein Folding. Science 305(5690): 1605-1609.
8. Cheung MS, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN (2002) Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(2): 685-690.
9. Baldwin RL (2007) Energetics of Protein Folding. Journal of Molecular Biology 371(2): 283-301.
10. Ding F, Dokholyan NV (2006) Emergence of Protein Fold Families through Rational Design. PLoS Comput Biol 2(7): 85.
11. Sheffler W, Baker D (2009) RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation. Protein Science 18(1): 229-239.
12. Pang CNI, Lin K, Wouters MA, Heringa J, George RA (2008) Identifying foldable regions in protein sequence from the hydrophobic signal. Nucl Acids Res 36(2): 578-588.
13. Lazar GA, Handel TM (1998) Hydrophobic core packing and protein design. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2(6): 675-679.
14. Vendruscolo M, Kussell E, Domany E (1997) Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Folding and Design 2(5): 295-306.
15. Friedberg I, Kaplan T, Margalit H (2000) Glimmers in the Midnight Zone: Characterization of Aligned Identical Residues in Sequence-Dissimilar Proteins Sharing a Common Fold. Int Sys Mol Biol. pp 162-170.
16. Chung SY, Subbiah S (1996) A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology. Structure 4(10): 1123-1127.
17. Bonneau R, Baker D (2001) Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction: Progress and Prospects. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 30(1): 173-189.
18. Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, Cuff A, Dallman T, et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucl Acids Res 35(suppl-1): D291-297.
19. Holm L, Sander C (1996) Mapping the Protein Universe. Science 273(5275): 595-602.
20. Madej T, Gibrat JF, Bryant SH (1995) Threading a database of protein cores. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 23(3): 356-369.
21. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12): 2577-2637.
22. Jacob F (1977) Evolution and Tinkering. Science 196(4295): 1161-1166.
23. Rost B, Sander C (1994) Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 20(3): 216-226.
24. Rost B, Sander C (1993) Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure at Better than 70% Accuracy. Journal of Molecular Biology 232(2): 584-599.
25. Ioerger T, Rendell L, Subramaniam S (1995) Change of representation to improve protein fold-class prediction. Machine Learning Journal 21: 151-176.
26. Bowie J, Luthy R, Eisenberg D (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253(5016): 164-170.
27. Friedberg I, Jaroszewski L, Ye Y, Godzik A (2004) The interplay of fold recognition and experimental structure determination in structural genomics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 14: 307-312.
28. Kingsford C, Chazelle B, Singh M (2005) Solving and analyzing side-chain positioning problems using linear and integer programming. Bioinformatics 21(7): 1028-1039 (2005).
29. Petsko GA, Ringe D (2004) Protein Structure and Function. Primers in Biology Pub, New Science Press Ltd., London, UK.
30. Rojnuckarin A, Kim S, Subrmaniam S (1998) Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Protein Folding: Access to Milliseconds Time Scale and Beyond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 4288-4292.
31. Bartoli L, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Casadio R (2007) The Pros and Cons of Predicting Protein Contact Maps. Protein Structure Prediction, Methods in Molecular Biology New Jersey, USA) 413: 199-217.
32. Sasisekharan V, Ponnuswamy PK (1970) Backbone and side-chain conformations of amino acids and amino acid residues in peptides. Biopolymers 9(10): 1249-56.
33. Ramachandran GN, Ramakrishnan C, Sasisekharan V (1963) Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. Journal of Molecular Biology 7: 95-99.
34. Ramachandran GN, Sasisekharan V (1968) Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry 23: 283-438.
35. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S (2004) Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 86(2): 235-277.
36. Evdokimov AG, Anderson DE, Routzahn KM, Waugh DS (2001) Unusual molecular architecture of the Yersinia pestis cytotoxin YopM: a leucine-rich repeat protein with the shortest repeating unit. Journal of Molecular Biology 312: 807-821.
37. Kerschen EJ, Cohen DA, Kaplan AM, Straley, SC (2004) The Plague Virulence Protein YopM Targets the Innate Immune Response by Causing a Global Depletion of NK Cells. Infect Immun 72: 4589-4602.
38. Quezada CM, Hicks SW, Galan JE, Stebbins CE (2009) A family of Salmonella virulence factors functions as a distinct class of autoregulated E3 ubiquitin ligases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 4864-4869.
39. Bernal-Bayard Jn, Ramos-Morales F (2009) Salmonella Type III Secretion Effector SlrP Is an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase for Mammalian Thioredoxin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284: 27587-27595.
40. Singer AU, Rohde JR, Lam R, Skarina T, Kagan O, et al. (2008) Structure of the Shigella T3SS effector IpaH defines a new class of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 1293-1301.
41. Lapaque N, Hutchinson JL, Jones DC, Meresse S, Holden D, et al. (2009) Salmonella regulates polyubiquitination and surface expression of MHC class II antigens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 14052-14057.
42. Saitoh M, Nishitoh H, Fujii M, Takeda K, Tobiume K, et al. (1998) Mammalian thioredoxin is a direct inhibitor of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK) 1. EMBO J 17: 2596-2606.
43. Dobson CM (2003) Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 426(6968): 884-890.
44. Selkoe DJ (2003) Folding proteins in fatal ways. Nature 426(6968): 900-904.
45. Lee C, Levitt M (1991) Accurate prediction of the stability and activity effects of site-directed mutagenesis on a protein core. Nature 352(6334): 448-451.
46. Schueler-Furman O, Baker D (2003) Conserved residue clustering and protein structure prediction. Proteins 52(2): 225-235.
47. Alexander PA, He Y, Chen Y, Orban J, Bryan PN (2009) The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(29): 11963-11968.
48. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains. Science 181(4096): 223-230.
49. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ (1998) JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 14(10): 892-3.
50. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT (2000) The Psipred protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16(4): 404-405.
51. Jones DT (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on positionspecific scoring matrices. Journal of molecular biology 295(2): 195-202.