Research Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research

Research Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-170

  Nichols Casebolt, Ann ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

RCR best practices; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Scientific integrity; Social science research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887616068     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195378108.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (98)

1. Abramson, J. S., & Mizrahi, T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41(3), 270-281.
2. Adler, N. E., & Stewart, J. (2010). Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 252-260.
3. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA Code of Ethics. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.counseling.org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2.aspx
4. American Psychological Association. (2010). APA Ethics Code. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
5. American Psychological Association, Science Student Council. (2006). A Graduate Student's Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order. Retrieved March 30, 2011 at http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-paper.pdf
6. American Psychological Association, Science Student Council. (2006). A Graduate Student's Guide to Involvement in the Peer Review Process.Retrieved March 30, 2011, from http://www.apa.org/research/publishing/peer-review.pdf
7. Apgar, D. H., & Congress, E. (2005). Authorship credit: A national study of social work educators' beliefs. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 101-112.
8. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2006). Compact Between Postdoctoral Appointees and Their Mentors. Available at https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/postdoccompact/
9. Austin, T. M., Richter, R. R., & Reinking, M. F. (2007). A primer on web surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 37(3), 180-186.
10. Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Archer, S. A. (2010). Characteristics that matter most: Doctoral students' perceptions of positive and negative advisor attributes. NACADA Journal, 30(1), 34-46.
11. Barsky, A. E. (2010). The virtuous social work researcher. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(1), Retrieved January 11, 2011, from http://www.socialworker.com/jswve/content/view/140/70/
12. Bekelman, J., Li, Y., & Gross, C. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA, 289, 454-465.
13. Biegel, D. E., Kola, L. A., Meeks, D., Stevenson, L., & Beimers, D. (2010). A university-agency mental health research collaboration: A case example. Care Management Journals, 11(2), 83-90.
14. Bion, J. (2009). Financial and intellectual conflicts of interest: Confusion and clarity. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 15, 583-590.
15. Blixen, C. E., Papp, K. K., Hull, A. L., Rudick, R. A. & Bramstedt, K. A. (2007). Developing a mentorship program for clinical researchers. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 27(2), 86-93.
16. Bradley, S. G. (2005). Managing competing interests. In F. L. Macrina (Ed.), Scientific Integrity: Text and Cases in Responsible Conduct of Research (3rd ed., pp. 159-185). Washington, DC: ASM Press.
17. Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O. G., Grady, W. R. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risks behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 436-457.
18. Bronstein, L. R. (2002). Index of interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 26(2), 113-122.
19. Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1-11.
20. Case summaries. (2006, March). Office of Research Integrity Newsletter, 14(2), 11. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from http://ori.hhs.gov/documents/newsletters/vol14_no2.pdf
21. Cheek, J. (2008). Researching collaboratively: Implications for qualitative research and researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 18(11), 1599-1603.
22. Columbia University, RCR Conflicts of Interest. (2003/2004). Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_conflicts/winCredits.html
23. Dana, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. JAMA, 290(2), 252-255.
24. Deem Corporation. (2007, July). New guidance on informed consent. Human Research Report, 22(7), 3. (Available from the Deem Corporation, P.O. Box 451117, Omaha, Nebraska 68145)
25. Donaldson, S. I., Ensher, E. A., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2000). Longitudinal examination of mentoring relationships on organizational commitment and citizenship behavior. Journal of Career Development, 26(4), 233-249.
26. Eisen, A. & Berry, R. M. (2002). The absent professor: Why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 38-49.
27. Eisner, M. (2009). No effects in independent prevention trials: Can we reject the cynical view? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 163-183.
28. Emanuel, E. J. (2003). Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research: Readings and commentary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Epstein, W. M. (2004). Confirmational response bias and the quality of the editorial processes among American social work journals. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(6), 450-458.
30. Erdem, F., & Aytemur, J. O. (2008). Mentoring-a relationship based on trust: Qualitative research. Public Personnel Management, 37(1), 55-66.
31. Evans, J. (2008). Mentoring magic: How to be an effective mentor: Tips from two highly successful principal investigators. The Scientist, 22(12), 70.
32. Falvo, D. R., & Parker, R. M. (2000). Ethics in Rehabilitation Education and Research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43(4), 197-202.
33. Ferguson, L. M., Myrick, F., & Yonge, O. (2006). Ethically involving students in faculty research. Nurse Education Today, 26, 705-711.
34. Frieden, T. R., & Collins, F. S. (2010). Intentional infection of vulnerable populations in 1946-1948: Another tragic history lesson. JAMA, 304(18): 2063-2064.
35. Gehlert, S., & Coleman, R. (2010). Using community-based participatory research to ameliorate cancer disparities. Health & Social Work, 35(4), 302-309.
36. Gelman, S. R., & Gibelman, M. (1999). A quest for citations? An analysis of and commentary on the trend toward multiple authorship. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 203-215.
37. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. R. (2001). Learning from the mistakes of others: A look at scientific misconduct in research. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 241-254.
38. Goodman, M., Dias, J., & Stafford, J. (2010). Increasing research literacy in minority communities: CARES fellows training program. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 5(4), 33-41.
39. Goodstein, D. (2002). Scientific misconduct. Academe, 88(1), 18-25.
40. Gorman, D. M., & Conde, E. (2007). Conflict of interest in the evaluation and dissemination of "model" school-based drug and violence prevention programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(4), 422-429.
41. Habermann, B., Broome, M., Pryor, E. R., & Ziner, K. W. (2010). Research coordinators' experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity. Nursing Research, 59(1), 51-57.
42. Harley, D. A. (2005). In a different voice: An African-American woman's experiences in the rehabilitation and higher education realm. Rehabilitation Education-Special Issue: The Role of Women in Rehabilitation Counselor Education, 15(1), 37-45.
43. Hauser, R. M., Weinstein, M., Pool, R., & Cohen, B. (Eds.). (2010). Conducting Biosocial Surveys: Collecting, Storing, Accessing, and Protecting Biospecimens and Biodata. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved January 14, 2011, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12942
44. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2006a). Training Scientists to Make the Right Moves. Available at http://www.hhmi.org/resources/labmanagement/training.html
45. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2006b). Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty. Available at http://www.hhmi.org/resources/labmanagement/mtrmoves_download.html
46. Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. New York: Aldine Publishing.
47. IASWR Directory of Funded Research. (2009). Retrieved January 9, 2011, from http://www.socialworkpolicy.org/publications/iaswr-publications/iaswrdirectory-of-funded-research.html
48. Institute of Medicine Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments. (2002). Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating and Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
49. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). (2009). Guide to Social Science Data Preparation and Archiving: Best Practice Throughout the Data Life Cycle (4th ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
50. Kennedy, H. P., Renfrew, M. J., Madi, B. C., Opoku, D., Thompson, J. B. (2006). The conduct of ethical research collaboration across international and culturally diverse communities. Midwifery, 22, 100-107.
51. Kennedy, H., Renfrew, M., Madi, B., Opoku, D., & Thompson, J. (2006). Guidelines for ethical research collaboration across international and culturally diverse communities. International Midwifery, 19(1), 7-10.
52. Kolata, G. (2010, August 12). Sharing of data leads to progress on Alzheimer's. New York Times. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html
53. Lalayants, M., Tripodi, T., & Jung, S. Y. (2009). Trends in domestic and international social work research: A 10-year review of American research journals. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(3), 209-215.
54. Lee, A., Dennis, C., & Campbell, P. (2007). Nature's guide for mentors. Nature, 447(14), 791-797.
55. Lin, L.-C. (2009). Data management and security in qualitative research. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 28(3), 132-137.
56. Luther, F. (2010). Scientific misconduct: Tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room? Journal of Dental Research, 89(2), 1364-1367.
57. Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific Integrity: Text and Cases in Responsible Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
58. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. A., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(9), 737-738.
59. Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., Anderson, M. S., & DeVries, R. (2009). Institutions' expectations for researchers' self-funding, federal grant holding, and private industry involvement: Manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior. Academic Medicine, 84(11), 1491-1499.
60. Marusic, A., & Bosnjak, L. (2010, July 21-24). Paper presented at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore. Retrieved December 5, 2010, from http://wcri2010.org/press/track/Concurrent%20Track%204/Track%204a/1%20-%20Ana%20Marusic%2022%20JULY%20Track%204a.pdf
61. McBrien, B. (2008). Evidence-based care: Enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study. British Journal of Nursing, 17(20), 1286-1289.
62. McCutcheon, V. V. (2006). Toward an integration of social and biological research. Social Service Review, 80(1), 159-178.
63. McDuff, N., & Netting, F. E. (March 2000). Lessons learned from a practitioner-academician collaboration. NVSQ, 29(1), 46-60.
64. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
65. Morgan, L. M., & Davidson, M. J. (2008). Sexual dynamics in mentoring relationships-a critical review. British Journal of Management, 10, 120-129.
66. Mystakidou, K., Panagiotou, I., Katsaragakis, S., Tsilika, E., & Parpa, E. (2009). Ethical and practical challenges in implementing informed consent in HIV/AIDS clinical trials in developing or resource-limited countries. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 6(2), 46-57.
67. National Academy of Sciences. (1997). Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
68. National Association of Social Workers. (2008). NASW Code of Ethics. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.naswdc.org/pubs/code/default.asp
69. Netting, F. E., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (1997). Authorship and collaboration: Preparing the next generation of social work scholars. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(3), 555-566.
70. Netting, F. E., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (1997). Authorship and collaboration: Preparing the next generation of social work scholars. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(3), 555-566.
71. Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. D. (2006). Authorship ethics: Issues and suggested guidelines for the helping professions. Counseling and Values, 50(3), 208-216.
72. Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443-479.
73. Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Mehlman, C. T., Bhandari, M. (2007). Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research: An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 89A(3), 608-613.
74. Osmo, R., & Landau, R. (2006). The role of ethical decision making by social workers. Social Work Education, 25(8), 863-876.
75. Park, R. L. (2008). Fraud in Science. Social Research, 75(4), 1135-1150.
76. Parry, O., & Mauthner, N. S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data, Sociology, 38(1), 139-152.
77. Peluchette, J. V. E., & Jeanquart, S. (2000). Professionals' use of different mentor sources at various stages: Implications for career success. Journal of Social Psychology, 140(5), 549-564.
78. Perlmutter, D. D. (2008, April 18). Are you a good protégé? The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 1.
79. Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. (2002). Research funding, conflicts of interest, and the "meta-methodology" of public relations. Public Health Reports, 117(4), 331-339.
80. Resnick, D. B., Gutierrez-Ford, C., & Peddada, S. (2008). Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 305-310.
81. Rose, G. L. (2003). Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 473-494.
82. Ross, B. D., Miller, F. G., & Wallerstein, N. (2007). Ethical issues in community-based participatory research: Balancing rigorous research with community participation in community intervention studies. Progress in Community Health Partnership: Research, Education, and Action, 1(2), 153-160.
83. Shattell, M. M., Chinn, P., Thomas, S. P., & Cowling, W. R. (2010). Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42(1), 58-65.
84. Sieber, J. E. (1991). Openness in the social sciences: Sharing data. Ethics & Behavior, 1(2), 69-86.
85. Singer, E., Mathiowetz, N.A., & Couper, M. P. (1993). The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on survey participation: The case of the 1990 U.S. Census. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 465-482.
86. Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown.
87. Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown.
88. Sorcinelli, M. D., & Yun, J. (2007). From mentor to mentoring networks: Mentoring in the new academy. Change, 39(6), 58-61.
89. Steiner, J. F., Curtis, P., Lanphear, B. P., Vu, K.O., & Main, D. S. (2004). Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Academic Medicine, 79(9), 865-872.
90. Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453(19), 980-982.
91. Tonidandel, S., Avery, D. R., & Phillips, M. G. (2007). Maximizing returns on mentoring: Factors affecting subsequent protégé performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 89-110.
92. Wegner, N. S., Korenman, S. G., Berk, R., & Berry, S. (1997). The ethics of scientific research: An analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 45(6), 371-380.
93. Wilson, P. P., Valentine, D., & Pereira, A. (2002). Perceptions of new social work faculty about mentoring experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 317-333.
94. Wolcial, L. D. (1995). The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(5), 276-280.
95. Wolf, L. E. (2010). The research ethics committee is not the enemy: Oversight of community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(4), 77-86.
96. Wright, D. E., Titus, S. L., & Cornelison, J. B. (2008). Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 323-336.
97. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.
98. Zimmer, M. (2010). "But the data is already public": On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313-325.