SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 305-310

Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study

(3) Resnik, David B a Gutierrez Ford, Christina a Peddada, Shyamal a

a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Ethics; Journal peer review; Reform

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PEER REVIEW; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

ADULT; COERCION; CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 49749151421 PISSN: 13533452 EISSN: 16605454 Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9059-4 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (90)

References (13)

1
- 0032527545
- Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: Setting the balance right
- Rennie, D. (1998). Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: Setting the balance right. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 300-303.
- (1998) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.280 , pp. 300-303
- Rennie, D.¹

2
- 0031974522
- Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
- Davidoff, F. (1998). Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded. Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, 66-68.
- (1998) Annals of Internal Medicine , vol.128 , pp. 66-68
- Davidoff, F.¹

3
- 0033514074
- Opening up BMJ to peer review
- Smith, R. (1999). Opening up BMJ to peer review. British Medical Journal, 318, 4-5.
- (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.318 , pp. 4-5
- Smith, R.¹

4
- 20444447683
- Is peer review in crisis?
- Mulligan, A. (2005). Is peer review in crisis? Oral Oncology, 41, 135-141.
- (2005) Oral Oncology , vol.41 , pp. 135-141
- Mulligan, A.¹

5
- 1642325520
- Improving peer review: Who's responsible?
- Schroter, S., et al. (2004). Improving peer review: Who's responsible? British Medical Journal, 328, 673-675.
- (2004) British Medical Journal , vol.328 , pp. 673-675
- Schroter, S.¹

6
- 0347763589
- How to review a paper
- Benos, D., et al. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physics Education, 27, 47-52.
- (2003) Advances in Physics Education , vol.27 , pp. 47-52
- Benos, D.¹

7
- 49749103861
- Committee on Publication Ethics
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2007). Guidelines on good publication and the code of conduct. Available at: http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/ guidelines. Accessed 25 June 2007.
- (2007) Guidelines on Good Publication and the Code of Conduct

8
- 0037024254
- Making reviewers visible-openness, accountability, and credit
- Godlee, F. (2002). Making reviewers visible-openness, accountability, and credit. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2762-2765.
- (2002) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.287 , pp. 2762-2765
- Godlee, F.¹

9
- 85047678991
- Anonymity of reviewers
- Fabiato, A. (1994). Anonymity of reviewers. Cardiovascular Research, 28, 1134-1139.
- (1994) Cardiovascular Research , vol.28 , pp. 1134-1139
- Fabiato, A.¹

10
- 0035855828
- Peers under pressure
- Dalton, R. (2001). Peers under pressure. Nature, 413, 102-104.
- (2001) Nature , vol.413 , pp. 102-104
- Dalton, R.¹

11
- 0037456824
- The politics of publication
- Lawrence, P. (2003). The politics of publication. Nature, 422, 259-261.
- (2003) Nature , vol.422 , pp. 259-261
- Lawrence, P.¹

12
- 0011317955
- Bad peer reviewers
- Anonymous
- Anonymous. (2001). Bad peer reviewers. Nature, 413, 93.
- (2001) Nature , vol.413 , pp. 93

13
- 33747698399
- To blind or not to blind?
- Regehr, G., & Bordage, G. (2006). To blind or not to blind? Medical Education, 40, 832-839.
- (2006) Medical Education , vol.40 , pp. 832-839
- Regehr, G.¹ Bordage, G.²

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.