Authorship credit: A national study of social work educators‘ beliefs

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 101-112

  Apgar, Dawn Hall ^a   Congress, Elaine ^b  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14944339912     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300356     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allison, P. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS institute.
2. Apgar, D., & Congress, E. (2002, March). Ethical beliefs of social work researchers: Results of a national study. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Nashville, TN.
3. Barretta-Herman, A., & Garrett, K. (2000). Faculty-student collaboration: issues and recommendations. Advances in Social Work, 2(1), 148-159.
4. Bayer, A. E., & Smart, J. C. (1991). Career publication patterns and collaborative styles in American academic science. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 613-637.
5. Brogan, K. M., & Brogan, J. D. (1982, April). Yet another ethical problem in technical writing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the College English Associates, Houston, TX.
6. Cooper, D. W. (1988, March). Unethical scholarship today: A preliminary topology. Paper presented at the Humanities, Science and Technology Conference. Big Rapids, MI.
7. Council on Social Work Education. (1998). Statistics on social work education in the United States: 1997. Alexandria, VA: Author.
8. Fine, M., & Kurdek, L. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141-1147.
9. Gelman, S., & Gibelman, M. (1999) A quest for citations? An analysis of and commentary on the trend toward multiple authorship. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 203-213.
10. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (1999). Who's the author? Ethical issues in publishing. Arete, 23(1), 77-88.
11. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2001). Learning from the mistakes of others: A look at scientific misconduct in research. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 241-254.
12. Goodyear, R., Crego, C., & Johnston, M. (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 203-210.
13. Hamilton, J., & Grego, A. (1997). Ethical questions regarding joint authorship: Business and non-business faculty perceptions on noncontributing authorship. Journal of Education for Business, 72, 325-330.
14. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
15. Jones, K. (1999). Ethics in publication. Counseling and Values, 43(2), 99-106.
16. National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
17. Netting, F., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (1997). Authorship and collaboration: Preparing the next generation of social work scholars. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 555-564.
18. Ross McDonald, J. (1993). What's wrong with these publications? Or, some pathologies of scientific authorship. Physics Today, 46(8), 51-52
19. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods in social work (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Seipel, M. (2003). Assessing publication for tenure. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 79-88.
21. Snodgrass, G. L. (1991, March). The pathology ethos: Looking for a rhetorical perspective on scientific fraud. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Boston, MA.
22. Tabachnick, B., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Pope, K. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist, 46, 506-515.
23. Thompson, B. (1994). The big picture(s) in deciding authorship order. American Psychologist, 49, 1095-1096