An extension of TAM model with IDT and security/privacy risk in the adoption of internet banking services in Greece

EuroMed Journal of Business

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 24-53

  Giovanis, Apostolos N ^a   Binioris, Spyridon ^a   Polychronopoulos, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Diffusion of innovation; Greece; Internet banking; New product adoption; Partial least squares; Perceived risk; Technology acceptance model; User studies; Virtual banking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887604451     PISSN: 14502194     EISSN: 1758888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14502191211225365     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (1998), “On the multi-dimensional nature of compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance”, Proceedings of Diffusion Interest Group in Information Technology (DIGIT), Helsinki, 1 September.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998), “A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 204-15.
3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 361-91.
4. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (2000), “A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 298-308.
5. Agarwal, R., Rastogi, S. and Mehrotra, A. (2009), “Customers’ perspectives regarding e-banking in an emerging economy”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 340-51.
6. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M.A. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Alagheband, P. (2006), “Adoption of electronic banking Services by Iranian Customers”, Master thesis, Lulea° University of Technology, Lulea°.
8. Al-Somali, S.A., Gholami, R. and Clegg, B. (2009), “An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia”, Technovation, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 130-41.
9. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-23.
10. Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.
11. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R. (1995), “The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration”, Technology Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285-309.
12. Bartel-Sheehan, K. (1999), “An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 24-38.
13. Bauer, K. and Hein, S.E. (2006), “The effect of heterogeneous risk on the early adoption of internet banking technologies”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 1713-25.
14. Brown, I., Hoppe, R., Mugera, P., Newman, P. and Stander, A. (2004), “The impact of national environment on the adoption of internet banking: comparing Singapore and South Africa”, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 1-26.
15. Burton-Jones, A. and Hubona, G.S. (2005), “Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption”, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 58-77.
16. Cartensen, L.L. (1995), “Evidence for a life-span theory of socio-emotional selectivity”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 4 No. 5, pp. 151-6.
17. Casalo, L., Flavian, C. and Nalygraveu, M. (2007), “The role of security privacy, usability and trust in the development of the online banking”, Online Information Review, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 583-603.
18. Celic, H. (2008), “What determines Turkish customer’s acceptance of internet banking?”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 353-70.
19. Chan, S.C. and Lu, M.T. (2004), “Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: a Hong Kong perspective”, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 21-43.
20. Chatchawanwan, Y., Chaipoopiratana, S. and Combs, H. (2009), “An investigation of the factors impacting customers’ willingness to adopt internet banking in Thailand”, Proceedings of ASBBS, Las Vegas, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1-9.
21. Chau, P.Y. (1996), “An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model”, Journal ofManagement Information Systems, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 185-204.
22. Chau, P.Y.K. and Lai, V.S.K. (2003), “An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking”, Journal of Organization Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 123-45.
23. Chen, L. (2008), “A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 32-52.
24. Chen, L., Gillenson, M. and Sherrell, D. (2002), “Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective”, Information & Management, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 705-19.
25. Cheng, T.C.E., Lam, D.Y.C. and Yeung, A.C.L. (2006), “Adoption of internet banking: an empirical study in Hong Kong”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 1558-72.
26. Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
27. Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, S. (1999), “Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 145-58.
28. Corbit, B.J., Thanasankit, T. and Yi, H. (2003), “Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions”, Electronic Commerce Research and Application, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 203-15.
29. Dabholkar, P.A. (1996), “Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 29-51.
30. Daniel, E. (1999), “Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland”, Internal Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 72-82.
31. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user of acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
32. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science,Vol.35No.8, pp. 982-1003.
33. Deakin, J., Aitken, M., Robbins, T. and Sahakian, B.J. (2004), “Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age”, Journal ofthe International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 590-8.
34. De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. and Kleijnen, M. (2000), “Customer adoption of e-service: and experimental study”, International Journal ofService Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 184-207.
35. Doolin, B., Dillon, S., Thompson, F. and Cornor, J.L. (2005), “Perceived risk, the internet shopping experience and online purchasing behaviour: a New Zealand perspective”, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 66-88.
36. E-Metrics (2008), “On-line for internet usage in Greece”, available at: http://emetrics.gr/(accessed 5 March 2009).
37. Eriksson, K., Kereem, K. and Nilsson, D. (2004), “Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 200-16.
38. Eriksson, K., Kareem, K. and Nilsson, D. (2008), “The adoption of commercial innovations in the former European markets: the case of internet banking in Estonia”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 154-69.
39. Eurostat (2008), “Internet access and use in the EU27 in 2008”, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=STAT/08/18. (accessed 5 March 2009)
40. Featherman, M.S. and Pavlou, A.P. (2002), “Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective”, available at: http://melody.syr.edu/hci/amcis02_minitrack/CR/Featherman.pdf. (accessed 10 March 2009)
41. Fishbein, M.A. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
42. Fornell, C. (1987), “A second generation of multivariate analysis: classification of methods and implications for marketing research”, in Huston, M. (Ed.), Review of Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 407-50.
43. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal ofMarketingResearch, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
44. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (1997), “Gender differences in perception and adoption of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 389-400.
45. Gefen, D., Straub, D. and Boudreau, M.C. (2000), “Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice”, Communications of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 4 No. 7, pp. 1-77.
46. Gerrard, P. and Cunningham, J.B. (2003), “The diffusion of internet banking among Singapore consumers”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 16-28.
47. Grabner-Krauter, S. and Faullant, R. (2008), “Consumer acceptance of internet banking: the influence of internet trust”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 483-504.
48. Guriting, P. and Ndubisi, N.O. (2006), “Borneo online banking: evaluating customer perceptions and behavioral intention”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 Nos 1/2, pp. 6-15.
49. Haenlein, M. and Kaplan, A.M. (2004), “A beginners’ guide to partial least squares analysis”, Understanding Statistics, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 283-97.
50. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
51. Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K. (1992), “The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 93-111.
52. Hartzel, K. (2003), “How self-efficacy and gender issues affect software adoption and use”, Communications ofthe ACM, Vol. 43 No. 9, pp. 167-71.
53. Hernandez, J.M.C. and Mazzon, J.A. (2007), “Adoption of internet banking: proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 72-88.
54. Hill, T., Smith, N.D. and Mann, M.F. (1986), “Communicating innovations: convincing computer-phobic to adopt innovative technologies”, in Lutz, R.J. (Ed.) Association for Consumer Research, Vol. 13, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 419-22.
55. Ho, S.S. and Ng, V. (1994), “A study of consumers perceived risk of electronic payment systems”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 26-36.
56. Hofstede, G.H. (1980), Culture Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, London.
57. Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995), “Why do individuals use computer technology: a Finnish case study”, Journal ofInformation and Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 227-38.
58. Jahangir, N. and Begum, N. (2008), “The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking”, African Journal ofBusiness Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 32-40.
59. Jaruwachirathanakul, B. and Fink, S. (2005), “Internet banking adoption strategies for a development country: the case of Thailand”, Internet Research,Vol.15No.3, pp. 295-311.
60. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G. and Crampton, S.M. (2000), “A note on SERVQUAL reliability and validity in information system service quality measurement”, Decision Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 725-44.
61. Jih, W.-J., Wong, S.-Y. and Chang, T.-B. (2005), “Effects of perceived risks on adoption of internet banking services: an empirical investigation in Taiwan”, International Journal of E-Business Research, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 70-88.
62. Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R. and Angst, C.M. (2006), “Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 781-804.
63. Karahanna, E., Straub, W. and Chervany, N.L. (1999), “Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption belief”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 182-213.
64. Kardaras, D. and Papathanassiou, E. (2001), “Electronic commerce opportunities for improving corporate customers support in banking in Greece”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 7, pp. 292-8.
65. Karjaluoto, H., Mattila, M. and Pento, T. (2002), “Factors underlying attitude formation towards online banking in Finland”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 261-72.
66. Keat, T.K. and Mohan, A. (2004), “Integration of TAM based electronic commerce models for trust”, Journal ofAmerican Academy of Business, Vol. 5 Nos 1/2, pp. 404-10.
67. Kolodinsky, J.M., Hogarth, J.M. and Hilgert, M. (2004), “The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US consumers”, The International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 238-59.
68. Koufaris, M. (2002), “Applying TAM and flow theory to online consumer behavior”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 205-23
69. Kuhlmeier, D. and Knight, G. (2005), “Antecedents to internet-based purchasing: a multinational study”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 460-74.
70. Lai, V.S.L. and Li, H.L. (2004), “Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis”, Information & Management, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 373-86.
71. Lassar, W.M., Manolis, C. and Lassar, S.S. (2005), “The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics and online banking adoption”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 176-99.
72. Lee, E.J., Kwon, K.N. and Schumann, D.W. (2004), “Segmenting the non-adopters category in the diffusion of internet banking”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 414-37.
73. Lee, M. (2009), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 130-41.
74. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003), “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 191-204.
75. Liao, S., Shao, Y., Wang, H. and Chen, A. (1999), “The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 63-74.
76. Lichtenstein, S. and Williamson, K. (2006), “Understanding consumer adoption of internet banking: an interpretive study in the Australian banking context”, J. Electronic Commerce Res., Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 50-66.
77. Lopez-Nicolas, C. and Molina-Castillo, F.J. (2008), “Customer knowledge management and e-commerce: the role of customer perceived risk”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 102-13.
78. Lu, J., Yao, J. and Yu, C. (2005), “Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 245-68.
79. Lu, J., Yu, C.S., Liu, C. and Yao, J.E. (2003), “Technology acceptance model for wireless internet”, Internet Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 206-22.
80. Luarn, P. and Lin, H.H. (2004), “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 873-91.
81. Lymperopoulos, C. and Chaniotakis, I. (2004), “Branch employees’ perceptions towards implications of e-banking in Greece”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 302-11.
82. MacInnes, I. (2005), “Causes of dispute in online auctions”, Electronic Markets, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 146-53.
83. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M. and Williams, J. (2004), “Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 99-128.
84. Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y. and Johnson, R.D. (1998), “The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 126-63.
85. Matthews, T. and Katzman, B. (2006), “The role of varying risk attitudes in an auction with a buyout option”, Economic Theory, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 597-613.
86. Md Nor, K.M. and Pearson, J.M. (2007), “The influence of trust on internet banking acceptance”, Journal ofInternet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 1-10.
87. Mercuri, R.T. (2005), “Trusting in transparency”, Communications ofthe ACM, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 15-9.
88. Minton, H.L. and Schneider, F.W. (1980), Differential Psychology, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.
89. Miyazaki, A.D. and Fernandez, A. (2000), “Internet privacy and security: an examination of online retailer disclosures”, Journal ofPublic Policy and Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 54-61.
90. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation”, Inform. Systems Res., Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 192-222.
91. Morrow, P.C., Presll, E.R. and McElroy, J.C. (1986), “Attitudinal and behavioural correlates of computer anxiety”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 1199-204.
92. Mukherjee, A. and Nath, P. (2003), “A model of trust in online relationship banking”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 5-15.
93. Ndubisi, N.O. (2007), “Customers perception and intentions to adopt internet banking: the moderation effect of computer self-efficacy”, AI & Society, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 315-27.
94. Ndubisi, N.O. and Sinti, Q. (2006), “Consumer attitudes, system’s characteristics and internet banking adoption in Malaysia”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 Nos 1/2, pp. 16-27.
95. Nelson, D.L. (1990), “Individual adjustment to information driven technologies: a critical review”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 79-100.
96. Oh, S., Ahn, J. and Kim, B. (2003), “Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitude”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 267-80.
97. Pavlou, P.A. (2003), “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model”, Internat. J. Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 69-103.
98. Phuangthong, D. and Malisuwan, S. (2008), “User acceptance of multimedia mobile internet in Thailand”, International Journal of the Computer, Internet and Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 22-33.
99. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H. and Pahnila, S. (2004), “Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, Internet Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 224-35.
100. Polatoglu, V.N. and Ekin, S. (2001), “An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of Internet banking services”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 156-65.
101. Porter, E.P. and Donthu, N. (2006), “Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics”, Journal ofBusiness Research, Vol. 59 No. 9, pp. 999-1007.
102. Prompattanapakdee, S. (2009), “The adoption and use of personal internet banking services in Thailand”, The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in DevelopingCountries, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 1-31.
103. Raman, M., Stephenaus, R., Alam, N. and Kuppusamy, M. (2008), “Information technology in Malaysia: e-service quality and update of internet banking”, Journal ofInternet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
104. Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., Noor, M.N.M. and Ling, K.P. (2003), “Receptiveness of internet banking by Malaysian consumers: the case of Penang”, Asian Academy ofManagement Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 1-29.
105. Rogers, E.M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, NY.
106. Rogers, E.M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, NY. in
107. Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York, NY.
108. Roth, M., Schumacher, J. and Brahler, E. (2005), “Sensation seeking in the community: sex, age and socio-demographic comparisons on a representative German population sample”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 39 No. 7, pp. 1261-71.
109. Sanmugam, A. (2008), “Adoption and usage of internet banking: a technological perspective”, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 1021484 (accessed 10 ™” January 2010).
110. Sathye, M. (1999), “Adoption of internet banking by Australian consumers: an empirical investigation”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 324-34.
111. Shergill, G.S. and Li, B. (2005), “Internet banking - an empirical investigation of customers’ behaviour for on-line banking in New Zealand”, Journal ofE-Business, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-16.
112. Shih, Y.Y. and Fang, K. (2004), “The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study internet banking in Taiwan”, Internet Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 213-23.
113. Shin, Y.Y. and Kim, W.Y. (2008), “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to cybworld user behavior: implications of the web 2.0 user acceptance”, Cyber Psychology& Behavior, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 378-82.
114. Sohail, M. and Shanmugham, B. (2003), “E-banking and customers’ preferences in Malaysia: an empirical investigation”, Information Sciences, Informatics and Computer Science: An International Journal, Vol. 150 Nos 3-4, pp. 207-17.
115. Struwig, F.W. and Stead, G.B. (2001), Planning, Designing and Reporting Research, Maskew Miller Longman, Cape Town.
116. Suh, B. and Han, I. (2002), “Effect of trust on customer acceptance ofinternet banking”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 247-63.
117. Tan, M. and Teo, T.S.H. (2000), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking”, Journal of Association ofInformation Systems, Vol. 1 No. 5, pp. 1-42.
118. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995), “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 561-70.
119. Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J. (1982), “Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 28-45.
120. Tung, F., Chang, S. and Chou, C. (2008), “An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information systems in HIS in the medical industry”, International Journal ofMedical Informatics, Vol. 77 No. 5, pp. 324-35.
121. Venkatesh, V. (1999), “Creating favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation”, MIS Quart, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 239-60.
122. Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation & emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-65.
123. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996), “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 451-81.
124. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.
125. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000), “Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 115-39.
126. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G. and Ackerman, P.L. (2000), “A longitudinal field study of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making processes”, Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes, Vol. 83 No. 1, pp. 33-60.
127. Vijayasarathy, L.R. (2004), “Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case of an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 747-62.
128. Vroom, V.H. and Pahl, B. (1971), “The relationship between age and risk taking among managers”, Journal ofApplied Psychology, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 399-405.
129. Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H. and Tang, T.I. (2003), “Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: an empirical study”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 501-19.
130. Wong, A. and Carducci, B.J. (1991), “Sensation seeking and financial risk-taking in every day money matters”, Journal ofBusiness and Psychology, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 525-30.
131. Wong, D., Loh, C., Yap, K.B. and Bak, R. (2009), “To trust or not to trust: the customer’s dilemma with e-banking”, Journal ofInternet Business, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
132. Wu, J.H. and Wang, S.C. (2005), “What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 719-29.
133. Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C. and Lin, L.-M. (2007), “Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 66-77.
134. Yi, U., Wu, Z. and Tung, L.L. (2005/2006), “How individual differences influence technology usage behaviour? Toward an integrated framework”, JComput Info Sys, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 52-63.
135. Yiu, C.S., Grand, G.R. and Edgar, D. (2007), “Factors affecting the adoption of internet banking in Hong Kong - implications for the banking sector”, International Journal ofInformation Management, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 336-51.
136. Zabel, K.L., Christopher, A.N., Marek, P., Wieth, M.B. and Carlson, J.J. (2009), “Mediation effects of sensation seeking of the age and financial risk-taking relationship”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 47 No. 8, pp. 917-21.
137. Zhao, A.L., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Ward, P. and Goode, M.M.H. (2008), “Perceived risk and Chinese consumers’ internet banking services adoption”, International Journal ofBank Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 505-25.
138. Zolait, A.H. and Ainin, S. (2008), “Internet banking technology adoption in Yemen: correlates of Rogers five innovation attributes”, Proceedings of the 9th International business Information Management Association Conference on Information Management in Modern Organization: Trends and and Challenges, Marrakech, 4-6 January.
139. Zuckerman, M. (1999), Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
140. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000), “Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 665-94.
141. Pavlou, A.P. and Gefen, D. (2004), “Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 37-59.
142. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. and Lai, R.Y.C. (1999), “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage”, Omega, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 25-37.
143. Turban, E., Lee, J., King, D. and Chung, H.M. (2000), Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.