Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Volumn 1, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 247-263

  Suh, Bomil ^a   Han, Ingoo ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Customer trust; Internet banking; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

CRYPTOGRAPHY; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FINANCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CUSTOMER TRUST; INTERNET BANKING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 2442694624     PISSN: 15674223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly. 24:(4):2000;665-694.
2. Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 88:(3):1980;588-606.
3. Chau P.Y.K. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences. 28:(2):1997;309-334.
4. Chin W.W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 22:(1):1998;vii-xvi.
5. Chin W.W., Gopal A., Salisbury W.D. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research. 8:(4):1997;342-367.
6. R. Clarke, Promises and threats in electronic commerce, available at www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/EC/Quantum.html, 1997.
7. Crosby L.A., Evans K.R., Cowles D. Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing. 54:(3):1990;68-81.
8. F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, Ph.D. Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
9. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13:(3):1989;319-340.
10. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35:(8):1989;982-1003.
11. Davis F.D., Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 45:(1):1996;19-45.
12. Dishaw M.T., Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information and Management. 36:(1):1999;9-21.
13. Doney P.M., Cannon J.P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing. 61:(2):1997;35-51.
14. Etezadi-Amoli J., Farhoomand A.F. A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information and Management. 30:(2):1996;65-73.
15. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18:(1):1981;39-50.
16. Gefen D. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega. 28:(6):2000;725-737.
17. Grazioli S., Jarvenpaa S.L. Perils of Internet fraud: an empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans. 30:(4):2000;395-410.
18. Hart P., Saunders C. Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science. 8:(1):1997;23-42.
19. Hair J.F. Jr., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Edition :1998;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. Hayduk L.A. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. 1987;The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
21. Igbaria M., Iivari J., Maragahh H. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information and Management. 29:(5):1995;227-238.
22. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS™ Command Language. 1993;Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL.
23. Karahanna E., Straub D.W. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information and Management. 35:(4):1999;237-250.
24. Keen P., Balance C., Chan S., Schrump S. Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design. 2000;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
25. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 1998;The Guilford Press, New York.
26. Lederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems. 29:(3):2000;269-282.
27. Lee M.K.O., Turban E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 6:(1):2001;75-91.
28. Macintosh G., Lockshin L.S. Retail relationships and store loyalty: a multi-level perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 14:(5):1997;487-497.
29. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 20:(3):1995;709-734.
30. McKnight D.H., Chervany N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 6:(2):2002;35-59.
31. Moon J., Kim Y. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management. 38:(4):2001;217-230.
32. Morgan R.M., Hunt S.D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing. 58:(3):1994;20-38.
33. Morris M.G., Dillon A. How user perceptions influence software use. IEEE Software. 14:(4):1997;58-65.
34. Newell S.J., Goldsmith R.E., Banzhaf E.J. The effect of misleading environmental claims on consumer perceptions of advertisements. Journal of Marketing: Theory and Practice. 6:(2):1998;48-60.
35. Ott R. Building trust online. Computer Fraud and Security. 2000:(2):2000;10-12.
36. Pitkow J.E., Kehoe C.M. Emerging trends in the WWW user population. Communications of the ACM. 39:(6):1996;106-108.
37. Ratnasingham P. The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 8:(4):1998;313-321.
38. Roberts P., Henderson R. Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the technology acceptance model. Interacting with Computers. 12:(5):2000;427-443.
39. Straub D.W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly. 13:(2):1989;147-169.
40. Straub D., Keil M., Brenner W. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Information and Management. 33:(1):1997;1-11.
41. Tan Y., Thoen W. Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 5:(2):2001;61-74.
42. Teo T.S.H., Lim V.K.G., Lai R.Y.C. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega. 27:(1):1999;25-37.
43. Turban E., Lee J., King D., Chung H.M. Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective. 2000;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
44. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 46:(2):2000;186-204.
45. Wilson D.T., Vlosky R.P. Interorganizational information system technology and buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial marketing. 13:(3):1998;215-234.