Doing Planning and Task Performance in Second Language Acquisition: An Ethnomethodological Respecification

Language Learning

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 629-664

  Markee, Numa ^a   Kunitz, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Ethnomethodology; Grammar searches; Planning; Socially distributed cognition; Word searches

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887411641     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12019     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 36-46). Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
2. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23-48). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
3. Bygate, P., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37-76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Carroll, D. (2004). Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Dysfluencies or interactional achievements? In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 201-220). London: Continuum.
5. De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's "speaking model" adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1-24.
6. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygoskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Drew, P. (2005). Is confusion a state of mind? In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.). Conversation and cognition (pp. 161-183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE.
9. Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63-103). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1-20.
11. Ellis, R. (2005a). Preface. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. vii-viii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Ellis, R. (2005b). Planning and task-based performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474-509.
14. Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students' performance. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 126-135). Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
15. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
16. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247.
17. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549-581.
20. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2003). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3-17.
21. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215-240.
22. Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 115-113.
23. Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233-260.
24. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53-73.
25. Goodwin, C. (2011). Contextures of action. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 182-193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 8-23.
27. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1986). Gesture and co-participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51-75.
28. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children's arguing. In S. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Gullberg, M. (2011). Multilingual multimodality: Communicative difficulties and their solutions in second-language use. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 137-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hayashi, M. (2003). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 109-141.
32. Helasvuo, M-L., Laakso, M., & Sorjonnen, M-L. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 1-37.
33. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 184-202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemic in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1-52.
36. Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30-52.
37. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J.-P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179-192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23-43.
39. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Hutchins, E., & Nomura, S. (2011). Collaborative construction of multimodal utterances. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 29-43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Lerner, G. (1996). On the "semi-permeable" character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238-276). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 414-468). New York: Academic Press.
47. MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science, 3-4, 191-211.
48. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404-427.
49. Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602-615.
50. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
51. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 52-83.
52. Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, culture and activity, 11, 267-278.
53. Murphy, K. M. (2011). Building stories: The embodied narration of what might come to pass. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 243-253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Ortega, L. (1995). The effect of planning in L2 Spanish narratives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
55. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
56. Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77-110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.
58. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising "learning" in applied linguistics (pp. 105-126). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009) A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3-10). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
61. Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111-142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Sawyer, R. K., & Greeno, J. G. (2009). Situativity and learning. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 347-367). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
65. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 12, pp. 261-286). New York: Academic Press.
66. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
68. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Pre-task and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
70. Streek, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 1-28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). New mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. Modern Language Journal, 91, 820-836.
75. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
76. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 253-276.
77. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic task: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-117). London: Longman.
78. Tajima, M. (2003). The effects of planning on oral performance of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
79. Truong, A. T., & Storch, N. (2007). Investigating group planning in preparation for oral presentations in an EFL class in Vietnam. Regional Language Centre Journal, 38, 104-124.
80. Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.
81. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27.